Consumer Reports 11 worst cars (for suburbanites)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim Prower
  • 18 comments
  • 1,535 views

Jim Prower

The Big Blue Ford.
Premium
Messages
10,620
Messages
gtp_jimprower
Because that's pretty much their only market. However, let's see what you agree with.

Here are the cars and SUVs with the lowest scores in Consumer Reports' annual auto tests.

Jeep Wrangler Unlimited

Score: 17 (out of 100)

Highs: Off-road ability

Lows: Ride, handling, braking, noise, fuel economy, fit and finish, visibility, frontseat comfort, access, reliability

Consumer Reports performs off-road testing at its Connecticut proving grounds, but off-road ability doesn't factor into the final scores.

That's part of the reason the Wrangler Unlimited gets the lowest score of any vehicle the magazine currently rates.

"We're rating these cars as most people would drive them in the SUV category," said Jake Fisher, a Consumer Reports auto test engineer.

While Jeep boasts that it sells to more owners who actually drive off-road than any other brand, the majority still spend most of their time on pavement.

A spokeswoman for Chrysler pointed out that the Jeep and Dodge vehicles in this list were fundamentally engineered for heavy-duty off-road use and the Jeeps, in particular, have been rated highly by other publications.

Hummer H3 (5 Cyl.)

Score: 27

Highs: Off-road ability, turning circle

Lows: Acceleration, fuel economy, access, visibility, ride, heavy tailgate, emergency handling, reliability

The H3 is Hummer's smallest model. It's about the same size as a Nissan Pathfinder or Toyota 4Runner. While the H3 is credited with good off-road capabilities, the magazine does not include its off-road tests in the final score either.

While the H3 was specifically criticized for acceleration, fuel economy and handling, it does not appear on any of Consumer reports lists of the worst vehicles in those areas, said Hummer spokesman Nick Richards.

"Consumer feedback on the vehicles been very strong," said Richards, "Niche publications geared toward our end of the market rate the vehicle very highly."

Jeep Liberty Sport

Score: 27

Highs: Off-road ability

Lows: Fuel economy, noise, agility, fit and finish

Like the Wrangler and H3, the Liberty is credited with good off-road capabilities, but that does not factor in to the final score.

Chevrolet Aveo5

Score: 32

Highs: Front access, turning circle, hatchback

Lows: Acceleration, handling

The Aveo is designed and built in South Korea, site of General Motors' global design and engineering base for small cars.

The Aveo5 compact car is a hatchback and it's an older design than the Aveo sedan. A new, redesigned Aveo5 will go on sale this spring.

Consumer Reports has not yet tested the Aveo sedan.

Dodge Nitro SLT

Score: 33

Highs: None

Lows: Ride, handling, braking, noise, fuel economy, fit and finish, visibility, access, reliability

The Nitro is a version of the Jeep Liberty with cosmetic changes and without low-range all-wheel-drive setting for driving off-road.

Consumer Reports found nothing particularly commendable in the Nitro - at least the Liberty was good off-road- but it scored slightly higher because the version the magazine tested had some comfort trim options lacking in the Liberty, said Consumer Reports vehicle tester Jake Fisher.

Toyota FJ Cruiser

Score: 36

Highs: Off-road ability, powertrain, reliability

Lows: Visibility, ride, handling, noise, fit and finish, premium fuel, access

The FJ Cruiser scored well in reliability and for off-road performance, but neither of those factors is included in Consumer Reports' numerical score.

Toyota Yaris (base, manual transmission)

Score: 36

Highs: Front access, turning circle, hatchback versatility

Lows: Acceleration, handling, vague shifter

The Yaris is the smallest and least expensive car Toyota sells in the United States. It actually ranks at the top of the list in both reliability and low cost of ownership, but those factors are not included in Consumer Reports' basic vehicle score.

The Yaris base model with an automatic transmission ranked higher, earning an overall score of 50.

Suzuki Forenza (base)

Score: 36

Highs: Turning circle

Lows: Acceleration, fuel economy, ride, IIHS sidecrash result, ABS option hard to find

Anti-lock brake systems, or ABS, keep a vehicle from skidding under hard braking, allowing a driver to maintain steering control during an emergency.

The Forenza received a "Poor" rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety for side impact protection despite having head- and torso-protecting side airbags.

A Suzuki representative could not immediately comment on the rating.

Jeep Patriot Limited

Score: 42

Highs: Transmission, unusual interior features

Lows: Acceleration, engine noise, driving position, visibility, front-seat comfort, fit and finish

The Patriot is based on same car-based engineering underpinnings as the Jeep Compass and Dodge Caliber. The taller Patriot can be purchased with option packages that make it off-road capable, however, while the Compass and Caliber are on-road only.

Chevrolet TrailBlazer LT (6-cyl.)

Score: 43

Highs: Low-speed ride

Lows: Clumsy handling, braking, fuel economy, noise, uncomfortable front safety belts, fit and finish

The Trailblazer shares its score and Consumer Reports' comments with the nearly identical GMC Envoy.

Mercury Grand Marquis

Score: 43

Highs: Large trunk

Lows: Engine noise, seat comfort, ride, fuel economy, IIHS side-crash result without side air bags, no ESC, no curtain air bags

The Grand Marquis is one of Ford Motor Co.'s three large "Panther Platform" vehicles. The others are the Lincoln Town Car and the Ford Crown Victoria. The Grand Marquis is the only one that's still primarily sold to non-fleet customers.

In a corporate statement, Ford Motor Co. pointed out that the percentage of its vehicles recommended by Consumer Reports rose from 54% last year to 64% this year and that 93% of its vehicles were found to have average or better reliability, up from 63% last year.

"As a side note, the Mercury Grand Marquis was AutoPacific's 2007 Ideal Vehicle Awards segment winner in the Large Luxury Car category," the company said.
Copyrighted, CNNMoney. All Rights Reserved.

Actually, these are all pretty much rubbish cars, save for the Wrangler, and maybe the Liberty. thoughts?

Original story
 
I'm not surprised that so many SUVs ranked badly for suburbanites. They said the Hummer H3 is a good car for what it was made and not these circumstances so I'm happy.
 
May want to put some photos in...

Jeep Wrangler Unlimited:
2007-jeep-wrangler-4drs.jpg


HUMMER H3:
2008_hummer_range05_s.jpg


Jeep Liberty Sport:
ext_design_overvieiw.jpg


Chevy Aveo5:
2008_Chevy_Aveo5_ext_1.jpg


Dodge Nitro SLT:
enclosure..ee8f12b


Toyota FJ:
Toyota%20FJ%20Cruiser%20F34%20Blog.jpg


Toyota Yaris:
2007_Toyota_Yaris_exfrdrvr342.jpg


Suzuki Forenza:
2004-suzuki-forenza-20040720020241346.jpg


Jeep Patriot Limited:
26Jeep_m_m.jpg


Chevy Trailblazer:
2005-chevrolet-trailblazer.jpg


Mercury Grand Marquis:
2008GrandMarquis2.jpg


====

I can agree to most of the truck choices, but the Gran Marquis? Come on... Sure, it gets absolutely horrid fuel economy and it isn't exactly a "nimble" vehicle, but the ride is just what you need in a big city. Its got the 3 C's: Comfort, Comfort, and Comfort.
 
I can agree to most of the truck choices, but the Gran Marquis? Come on... Sure, it gets absolutely horrid fuel economy and it isn't exactly a "nimble" vehicle, but the ride is just what you need in a big city. Its got the 3 C's: Comfort, Comfort, and Comfort.

I fairly agree with the choices, but the Trailblazer isn't as bad as they make it out to be actually. Its miles ahead of any Chrysler SUV product. That having been said I LOVED the comments about the Dodge products--it made my day. :D

And as far as the Grand Marquis, its for old people so who cares about everything else. Like YSS said it has the three Cs, comfort comfort and comfort. And the gas mileage isn't that bad considering its weight and the engine. It can get 25-27mpg highway along with 16-18mpg city. And probably more when an old person driving due to them being super slow with the throttle.
 
I'm not surprised that so many SUVs ranked badly for suburbanites. They said the Hummer H3 is a good car for what it was made and not these circumstances so I'm happy.

I completely agree the for the most part, the vehicles they chose are pretty horrible. I am surprised to see the number of SUVs because anybody who has been to suburban America knows that every suburban family is almost required by law to have one.

Seeing the Yaris up there is a little surprising. And maybe we should be worried that there are four GM and Chrysler products up there, especially 3 Jeeps.
 
How the hell can you have a consumer report that doesn't include reliability!?
It actually ranks at the top of the list in both reliability and low cost of ownership, but those factors are not included in Consumer Reports' basic vehicle score.
 
And maybe we should be worried that there are four GM and Chrysler products up there, especially 3 Jeeps.

I'd be more worried about Chrysler than GM. The Aveo is due to be replaced soon-ish, the HUMMER finally got around to getting a V8 and only lost 1 MPG, and the Trailblazer is dead after 2008. So, yeah, I wouldn't be worried much at all.

Plus, we all know the Daewoo, I mean, "Chevrolet" Aveo is crap anyway...
 
The FJ Cruiser is surprising. There's at least 3 dozen or so running around the Plano area every day.
 
The FJ Cruiser is surprising. There's at least 3 dozen or so running around the Plano area every day.

Yea, and they all look like crap and are wheelie-bin plasty quality and completely inept at on-road or off-road maneuvers. You thought the Chrysler products were bad? The new FJ Cruiser is as bad as the PT Cruiser. Its horrid.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled topic.
 
How the hell can you have a consumer report that doesn't include reliability!?

It actually ranks at the top of the list in both reliability and low cost of ownership, but those factors are not included in Consumer Reports' basic vehicle score.

I wondered that too. And yet:

Dodge Nitro SLT

Score: 33

Highs: None

Lows: Ride, handling, braking, noise, fuel economy, fit and finish, visibility, access, reliability

?
 
Nope, CR has a curious way of weighting the scores for each car. The V8 Tundra has proven less than reliable, that didn't seem to affect it's rating all that much. In fact I'm quite annoyed by the ratings in the full size Pick Up Category.

Toyota Tundra (SR5 5.7 V8) - 70 Highs- power train, acceleration, agility, ESC widely available Lows - Ride w/TRD suspension, visibility, braking, control placement, ESC Dis-engages in 4WD (What? That's real nice), no full time 4WD, reliability

Chevrolet Silverado - (1500 LT 5.3 V8) - 65 Highs - Ride, access, available ESC, selectable full time 4WD, payload Lows- Braking, Turning Circle


:irked:

You see what I mean?

EDIT: About the Nitro:

Highs: None. Humor occasionally slips through, the Honda Insight had it's competitors listed as the Toyota Prius and a pogo stick a few years back. :lol:
 
How the hell can you have a consumer report that doesn't include reliability!?

Exactly what I thought when I read that quote.

Stupid, stupid list. Reliability comes down to a cheaper cost of ownership in the long-run. It's why many of the more reputable rental car companies use Toyotas.
 
Exactly what I thought when I read that quote.

Stupid, stupid list. Reliability comes down to a cheaper cost of ownership in the long-run. It's why many of the more reputable rental car companies use Toyotas.

Erm, I'd say its rather even between GM and Ford THEN followed by Toyota. Ford and GM still own the rental vehicle crowns.
 
JCE
Erm, I'd say its rather even between GM and Ford THEN followed by Toyota. Ford and GM still own the rental vehicle crowns.

Not in Canada. At least, 'round here in Canada.

There's much more pro-America/brand loyalty etc in the US.
 
Wonder how the hell they made the list if some cars hit it because of poor reliability and some got on it for no particularly good reason?

I don't like the Yaris a whole lot... the steering is vaguer than a pre-invasion CIA report on WMDs, the handling is Jekyll-and-Hyde (between the short wheelbase, the soft shocks and the torsion beam rear, it can get preeeeetty interesting) and the interior is damn cheap. It's nowhere near as good as the Honda Fit, for me, but I'll admit that it's better than many other superminis.
 
Back