Is it me or whenever someone attacks another player both will always make up a reason why the other has failed and lost the war.
Well no wonder everyone left. **** this game, its simply unfair. Since magpul stabbed me in the back, as did haitch, lancer gets all my land. I'm done with you guys, I'm half tempted just to get this thread locked. I'm going to a more professinal site where the rules are set in stone. Mr. Melancholy, your now top comod. Since lawlessness reigns here, I might as well retain top mod staus to keep the burden of melancholy.
I'm sorry famine, I was wrong for reviving this thread..
Ok guys, I don't know how many times I've said this but you still haven't figured it out. I'm not a mod, but this was decided before the game started so I'm just pointing out existing rules. This is why we agreed when this game started that mod or not, any participant of a war could not decide the outcomes of things, because it would be just unfair. Quack, everyone turned on you because every time ghskilla made a move, you responded by just saying your stuff was better. Exhibit A: your Rangers. Every time anyone even thought of saying they had something that could take on your ground forces, you'd say "oh no, my ground troops are the best in the world, and oh yeah there's no WAY revenge is on your side, we want it WAY more than you do." It's like you couldn't bear the thought that maybe your troops could conceivably ever be beaten, which kind of defeats the purpose of the game, doesn't it? You have to adapt, and not just keep insisting that your stuff is the best. Admittedly, ghskilla countered with a lot of the same tactics, but that's because that's the only way to fight it.
This is why anyone who's in a war can't mod it. It MUST be a third-party, unbiased mod. Every single time you got in a war Quack, you tried to mod it, and it always bit you back because you were biased. And I'm not saying it's your problem, because ANYONE would be biased to themselves if they were in your position, but you never were willing to wait for another mod to do it. If you had, things might have been different and there would have been fair outcomes to wars.
I would offer to mod myself, but college takes up most of my day so I'm not on so much.
Yes. I failed. I tried to do it all myself, taking time out my school days to help but I failed. I'm sorry to the guys I failed.
Despite all I just said, I do very much appreciate your efforts to mod this game. You did a fine job, until the point where you went to war with somebody, and then acted as Famine posted.
OMG SUPER LAZER ARKBIRD EPIC GUNS!
Dude, come on. It's 2023 or whatever. All of ghs's technology is completely plausible, and he wasn't invincible at all. His ground and sea forces were relatively pathetic, and even has almighty air force had weaknesses. He got all his planes from a game, and I've gotten most of my stuff from games nobody remembers, whereas you kept the approach of "we're from the South, we've got the best morale and the Rangers and that's all that matters". You could have just as easily developed superweapons like pretty much everyone else was doing, and countermeasures to ghs's air power. Super planes? Non-super AA is not going to cut it. So invest in a hyper-advanced AA system. Make up technology to counter his made up technology.
EVERYONE READ
I am going to remake this thread in a few days or so and rename it Create a Nation 2.5. I will NOT get this thread locked, and let those who wish to continue to play here do so. The next thread WILL have stricter and clearer rules, more split up tasks between mods and more focus on alliance groups than superpowers. If you wish to play here, say so now, if you wish to follow me say so. I will keep a tally so I know when is a good time to start.
Ugh, remaking a second time? Will we have to start back at the beginning, right after World War III? That'll be kinda tedious. But if you're going to make a new one, I'm pretty sure all of us will move over to the new one.
Before we make the new one, how about we all agree to start completely fresh and completely lay out and agree on all of the rules, and only then do we start over?
I'm thinking it is time... I enjoyed considering the language, trade, and other things that would occur, should my country actually exist as such, under the circumstances, but, my word, it's gone wrong.
