Cursed Political Content

  • Thread starter Thread starter TexRex
  • 7,071 comments
  • 460,004 views
IMG_20250630_021434.png
 
OH!!! It says "Retired"!
Not retired from attempting to ragebait for bucks though unfortunately. He was clowned so many times on that thread he had to switch comments off on the post.
 
???

muslim.jpg


OH!!! It says "Retired"!
Classic no-win scenario. She doesn't look "Muslim", therefore Mamdani is somehow a hypocrite. If she was wearing a burqa, they'd say it was further evidence Muslims are "taking over".


Which is ironic, because conservatives want the very thing they vilify Muslims over, except they want it to be "Christian" instead of "Sharia".
 
Last edited:
Wait until she finds out that alligators don't eat humans. They'll bite humans, but they don't eat us, so she even managed to make an already stupid comment even stupider.
 
She already has a prefab one that fits perfectly.
How dare you talk about Jigsaw that way?!

Except that the Saw killer would be jealous of Loomer's genocidal bodycount fantasy.
 
Being literally kept up at night wondering how often another man itches his own ring - and not being familiar with the concept of washing your hands before eating - is Totally Normal Behaviour.
 
Being literally kept up at night wondering how often another man itches his own ring - and not being familiar with the concept of washing your hands before eating - is Totally Normal Behaviour.
Even the Jews (his taboo) traditionally wash their hands prior to meals so it looks like Mr. Kirk is doing some heavy projecting here.
 
Someone on the right needs to take Charlie Kirk and Laura Gooner's access to social media away from them. They're like Beavis and Butthead, not just because of their visual similarities to the duo, but with their takes on how societies actually work.
 
Last edited:
Why do people think politicians should be listened to. When people talk trash about musicians or movie stars talking about politics, the politicians are hardly any more qualified.
"Shut up and legislate."
 
Last edited:
2/3? Please. There are 273 Republicans to 249 Democrats (and independents aligned with Democrats).

alternative.jpg
 
Last edited:
Good. The “argument” government/powerful child predators should be protected else society collapses is not a society we should be living in.
 
I mean, to be fair, if there is/was a list, who thinks Trump will let the actual list come out? If anything does come out, it’s going to be the “right” version.
 
I mean, to be fair, if there is/was a list, who thinks Trump will let the actual list come out? If anything does come out, it’s going to be the “right” version.
The issue with trying to publish a "right" version (which I too, thought they'd probably try) now is that Mango Moron just spent the last few days telling people to ignore it and it's made up by Obama. All the moronic followers like Tim Pool are pushing the most brain rot take ever: if you want the Epstein files published, that means you want child pornography published.

However, this administration is also so ******* stupid, I wouldn't put it past them to contradict themselves once more and go, "Here's the list. It has AOC & Mamdani on it!"
 
I actually do think it's doubtful that there is some kind of client list. It seems like it would be a dumb move. I think the idea of a client list was made up to stoke conspiracy theorists, and those same conspiracy theorists are not going to gladly accept being duped into believing that Epstein would write down a nicely organized client list for them to salivate over. It seems exactly like the kind of thing Trump would make up.

That being said, I'm sure there is plenty of evidence by which one could generate a client list. But doing so would involve Trump himself. He was always playing with fire with Epstein. I love that it blew up in his face. The idea that Obama was covering up Epstein crap instead of the guy who partied with him, who has a mail-order bride as a first lady, and who sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll ... that's beyond stupid.
 
Last edited:
I mean, to be fair, if there is/was a list, who thinks Trump will let the actual list come out? If anything does come out, it’s going to be the “right” version.
Sure, but if you are an author that has historically been against conservatives and also has a famous book with a preteen orgy it seems very odd to suddenly tow the party line that there was no list of pedophiles.
 
Sure, but if you are an author that has historically been against conservatives and also has a famous book with a preteen orgy it seems very odd to suddenly tow the party line that there was no list of pedophiles.
It's always possible that he's worried about what evidence there is. I'm just asking questions here!!!
 
Quick question.

Why didn't the Dems release the Epstein files if they're so intent on them being released now? They were in power and had every opportunity to do so after all.

Just political grandstanding I presume.
 
Back