Cursed Political Content

  • Thread starter Thread starter TexRex
  • 7,123 comments
  • 465,486 views
TexRex
Conservatives are being freaks about Taylor Swift again.

mbd-swift.png
Click to expand...

Regardless of anything Taylor accomplishes, this is all she is to them. A baby machine. Her influence is just a tool to convince women to produce babies. The absolute insanity of viewing Taylor as a mechanism for convincing white women to produce babies is psychopathic. They don't see women as people. They're tools to fight some kind of race war.
 
Last edited:
Danoff
Regardless of anything Taylor accomplishes, this is all she is to them. A baby machine. Her influence is just a tool to convince women to produce babies. The absolute insanity of viewing Taylor as a mechanism for convincing white women to produce babies is psychopathic. They don't see women as people. They're tools to fight some kind of race war.
Click to expand...
I think it would be very funny if she used IVF...because reasons.

ivf.jpg


Modern American conservatism is mental illness.
 
TexRex
I think it would be very funny if she used IVF...because reasons.

ivf.jpg


Modern American conservatism is mental illness.
Click to expand...
Well Carney is a clown. Also I don't think he understands how IVF works. Like, does he realize there is still a pregnancy and childbirth? Does he realize that without IVF there isn't one, because presumably if there were an alternative route it would be taken?

I assume he hates adoption too, because children are gifts but not those children.
 
Danoff
Well Carney is a clown. Also I don't think he understands how IVF works. Like, does he realize there is still a pregnancy and childbirth? Does he realize that without IVF there isn't one, because presumably if there were an alternative route it would be taken?

I assume he hates adoption too, because children are gifts but not those children.
Click to expand...
"Have children. Families are good. ... NO!!! YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG!!!"
 
lol Cernobitch

cernobitch-bus.jpg


How nice of everyone to go along with the Marxist agitators: Montgomery Police arresting and booking her, the prosecutor charging her and even requesting that the judge recognize that she was in violation of State of Alabama segregation law rather than the Montgomery City Code of which she was in violation, the jury convicting, and Alabama state court affirming her conviction. But sure, "the back of the bus rule had almost totally been eliminated."
 
The "geriatric pregnancy" thing, it's also worth mentioning, is just another way to turn women into breeders. Your 20s are a very important time in your life if you're planning on having a career. If you delay having a career until after you have children, you're immediately in a massive uphill battle, and constantly under pressure to stay home with the kids in order to save on daycare expenses.

If you're 18 and considering college. If you put it off to have children, your best earning potential as soon as you're done having children is to be a nanny for those kids to avoid daycare expenses. It's not even close. So that's an instant trap. Even a college graduate faces a similar situation if they have children before getting a job. And then, when you finally are ready to start your career, there are a lot of questions about what you've been up to and whether you still retain what you learned in college, etc.

Telling women they must pump out kids in their 20s is the glossy way of telling them not to have a career. And these guys hate it when women have careers.
 
Danoff
The "geriatric pregnancy" thing, it's also worth mentioning, is just another way to turn women into breeders. Your 20s are a very important time in your life if you're planning on having a career. If you delay having a career until after you have children, you're immediately in a massive uphill battle, and constantly under pressure to stay home with the kids in order to save on daycare expenses.

If you're 18 and considering college. If you put it off to have children, your best earning potential as soon as you're done having children is to be a nanny for those kids to avoid daycare expenses. It's not even close. So that's an instant trap. Even a college graduate faces a similar situation if they have children before getting a job. And then, when you finally are ready to start your career, there are a lot of questions about what you've been up to and whether you still retain what you learned in college, etc.

Telling women they must pump out kids in their 20s is the glossy way of telling them not to have a career. And these guys hate it when women have careers.
Click to expand...
And I think that was the message that Chiefs kicker Harrison Buttkisser gave to that graduation class at catholic Benedictine College a year or so ago. He urged the females to be more concerned about having families than careers.
 
Jezza819
And I think that was the message that Chiefs kicker Harrison Buttkisser gave to that graduation class at catholic Benedictine College a year or so ago. He urged the females to be more concerned about having families than careers.
Click to expand...
It's short sighted, narcissistic (for men), dehumanizing, controlling... lots of toxic traits.

It reminds me of the discussion we had here about slavery a while back. An underappreciated offense of slavery is to believe that the best use of a person is manual labor. It destroyed so much wealth for the American south, held them back in the industrial revolution, and basically deprived their economy of the far more efficient and transformative power of enabling enslaved people to do MORE with their lives. Some people might still want to do manual labor, maybe that is their calling, but a lot of the lives of slaves were misused, wasted, when all of society could have benefited from them. The south wasted countless leaders, scholars, inventors, artists, athletes, writers, philosophers, scientists on picking crops.

The same is true for women being nannies. Trying to trick, or force, them into child care destroys as much wealth and potential of the lives of women as slavery. But in the US it is an even larger problem. At the civil war, the black population was 14%. We were wasting the lives of some large fraction of that 14% on picking crops. But women make up more than 50% of the US population. Half of our population being dedicated to child care when so many of them would be leaders, inventors, scientists... And they live longer. And far fewer of them are incarcerated.

The idea of keeping women undereducated and underemployed is detrimental to everyone for the sake of the arrogance of their would-be masters.
 
Last edited:

Latest Posts

Back