DaimlerChrysler

  • Thread starter JohnBM01
  • 34 comments
  • 1,182 views
neon_duke
So in other words, Mopar fans can't come up with anything that's worse since the merger because you're going to simply define every reason as irrelevant.
Click to expand...

I define all issues that don't affect the products as irrelevant.

I mean, not irrelevant to insiders or workers or those 'in the know' but they represent a very small portion of the market - and almost no portion of the profit. The average man or woman who walks into a Dodge dealer and sees Sto 'n' Go doesn't give a damn about Bob Eaton or Bob Lutz.

neanderthal
in the mid/ late nineties every manufacturer designed, developed and introduced their own version of either a minivan or SUV
Click to expand...

Audi.

:P
 
neanderthal
VW. bentley. ferrari. porsche. kia (didnt compete with jeep GC) isuzu, panoz etc
Click to expand...
Based on the statement that you made, eliminate VW, Kia, and Isuzu from your list - the only companies that don't qualify are Audi, Porsche, and fringe companies.

neanderthal
smartass.
Click to expand...

:P
 
Read Signature. :P

Anyway, I think It's kind of fishy that all but one member of chrysler's board of directors was fired.

I think they screwed over the grand cherokee and the pt cruiser AND the entire plymouth brand. Merc's are overrated. I'd jump off a bridge before I paid 30,000 for the utter waste that is the smart. overrated.
 
Yeah, most of Chrysler's board has changed, but you do realize, so has Mercedes'...

And how was Plymouth screwed? They were already declining under ChryCo before the merger.

What $30,000 Smarts have you been looking at? :confused:
 

Latest Posts

Back