- 2,587
I wouldn't hope that. 64bit XP doesn't work with anything.
I know. But I'd rather he stays with Vista especially if its 64bit, then you don't need to wipe when switching over to Win7 64bit.
I wouldn't hope that. 64bit XP doesn't work with anything.
I know. But I'd rather he stays with Vista especially if its 64bit, then you don't need to wipe when switching over to Win7 64bit.
Minus the part where Vista is a horrible joke.
Vista set the groundwork for Windows 7, I hardly see how it's a joke.
Because it is. Would be like saying ME set the ground work for XP. I ran 32 bit XP Pro till I Windows 7 64 bit because Vista was that bad.
Well that sucks for you.
Because it is. Would be like saying ME set the ground work for XP. I ran 32 bit XP Pro till I Windows 7 64 bit because Vista was that bad.
So you didn't actually run Vista? I have a vista machine upstairs as well as a second vista machine that I sold to my brother a few years ago. Both are running solid. Yes, there are more system resources being used that what an XP OS is running, but other than being a little boated, it has been a solid OS, both 32 and 64 bit versions.
I would never compare Vista to ME. ME was a failure class all of its own.
Yeah, stable version of Windows was really terrible.
Next you are going to tell me Windows ME was good.
I run XP Pro myself and I hate it. Being stuck with DirectX 9 and 4GB of RAM is AWESOME.
My old laptop (before the drive failed) and the laptop I'm using now both ran Vista 32 bit just fine for years. I never saw what everyone's problem was with it.
So upgrade? It isn't that much. Also, I still find it funny how often people mention the 4GB of ram, since I don't often do that even when editing large image files and raws.
I guess just one of those things? It just didn't offer much to make it better than XP in my opinion. No major interface enhancements or performance.
Also, Vista wasn't a fail. It only got bad flack since when Microsoft released it, they hadn't worked out all the kinks. It had it's place, and it was relatively user friendly. The main drawback was that you had to give permission to access anything. My grandma and uncle's PC's both have Vista, and they swear by it, despite the few problems. No OS will ever be perfect, since everyone likes different things.![]()
Well, judging by the opinions of everyone here, 64-bit is the way to go, I need to find out the specification of the PC before consider upgrading to 7 64-bit. I know that my uncle ran XP 64-bit on his gaming PC before he had to sell it on to support a family. So, I'll drop him a text and see what's what. I will let all know the outcome.
Yeah umm, that's pretty poor!
I think it's a 754 socket. You should download speccy to check the processor for what socket it uses since the program would be able to detect what socket the cpu uses(it will be listed as "package" when you click on the cpu).AMD Sempron Processor 3400 2.01GHz
Yeah umm, that's pretty poor! Can you find out what socket the semperon uses?
Its a socket 754. It should be able to support at least 4 Gb of RAM.
The best CPU possible is the Athlon 64 3700+
I will, I always assumed it ran better than that. But I can get 8GB of RAM for £40, a 500GB HDD for £50. Hell, you're right, I'd be better off buying new.