- 691
- WV
Edit: I think I had downforce on these two cars which caused the discrepancy 
. This thread can be locked now.
On my 2nd account I have all 22 Nascar cars and they are freshly broken in with around 200 miles. As I was looking through the cars I noticed that 2 had a higher than average pp. Most Nascar cars have 570, 571 or 572pp while the 2010 Kyle Busch has 587pp and the 2010 Tony Stewart has 588pp. This pp also shows when you click the car and on the tuning screen when at a track. I have no idea if this is only a visual bug or if they are a bit better than the others. I also checked the dealership and all Nascar cars start at 568pp.
Is this an old bug or a new one introduced with the new pp changes? Are you all seeing the same thing?
. This thread can be locked now.On my 2nd account I have all 22 Nascar cars and they are freshly broken in with around 200 miles. As I was looking through the cars I noticed that 2 had a higher than average pp. Most Nascar cars have 570, 571 or 572pp while the 2010 Kyle Busch has 587pp and the 2010 Tony Stewart has 588pp. This pp also shows when you click the car and on the tuning screen when at a track. I have no idea if this is only a visual bug or if they are a bit better than the others. I also checked the dealership and all Nascar cars start at 568pp.
Is this an old bug or a new one introduced with the new pp changes? Are you all seeing the same thing?
Last edited:
. They were some of the last cars to be broken in and I was running a little at Indy instead of Daytona for a change.
