Initiat process=/q&a.exe
Do. There really isn't a downside to downforce.
Plus, if the car in question is an LP-700 you would be putting a wing on your wing, for 4X the downforce!
Termenate process=/q&a.exe
Apart that most cars get a lot uglier.
And normally more downforce would mean that you sacrifice some top speed.
But I don't think this is the case in GT5
Initiate process=/q&a.exe
Do. There really isn't a downside to downforce.
Plus, if the car in question is an LP-700 you would be putting a wing on your wing, for 4X the downforce!
Terminate process=/q&a.exe
Don't.
Be different.
You scare me... Your message looks like coming directly from a PC...
![]()
Its been my experience that if you put a wing on a car that has no adjustable front downforce, you'll end up with a car that understeers. You will then have to compensate for that in another area of the tune which is not a good thing. If I do add a wing, I keep the adjustments at 50% or below. Sometimes it depends on the weight distribution of the car also.
However, overall, it will still corner better and post better then without one
Initiate process=/offr.exeI had the same problem today eating a scone.
Do I add squirty cream or not?
Initiate process=/offr.exe
sqrtycrm.dll is available now, if you want it.
And to OP, wng.dll is only 2,000Cr. for all it's purposes!
Terminate process=/offr.exe
Why do all your posts include the .dll (dynamic link libraries) and .exe (executable) suffixes?
Initiate process=/post.exe
...does not compute. Please refer to C:/WINDOWS/🤬/Win32/VENOM.exe for troubleshooting.
Terminate process=/post.exe
I ask a simple question and you have to be a smartass...go figure.
Computers these days...
I have no response to that
Unless you're on a track with very little to no cornering involved, a wing will always make sense.