Do you buy CD's?Music 

  • Thread starter Thread starter Iceman
  • 153 comments
  • 4,313 views

Do you buy Cd's?

  • Yes, I always buy Cd's

    Votes: 15 22.4%
  • Yes, but only after dowloading a few songs from the album first

    Votes: 27 40.3%
  • Yes, If it is an artist of which I already own several albums

    Votes: 9 13.4%
  • No, Downloading music is free and much easier

    Votes: 12 17.9%
  • No, I can't afford Cd's

    Votes: 4 6.0%

  • Total voters
    67
If SJR are so amazingly unique that would mean they are entirely different from any other band, meaning no other band has ripped off their music.
 
HATEKORE
I only buy SJR cds because no other artist deserves my support for ripping SJR off
You only buy SJR CDs because you're boringly obsessed with them and you have no imagination.

So, let's see, Barry Manilow, Britney Spears, and NSync all ripped off Superjoint Ritual? That's probably news to them.
 
HATEKORE
im sure they have taken influences from him
Influence? :lol:

Do you even know what that word means? How the hell can Britney Spears take influence from SJR when she was making (crap) music before SJR had even released a full-length album?
 
Superjoint Ritual - Demo Tape (1995)

Demo
1995


1. It Takes No Guts 01:55
2. **** Your Enemy 01:28
3. Stupid, Stupid Man 02:21
4. Four Songs 05:49
5. Messages 01:53
6. Manson 01:55
7. Superjoint Ritual 06:19
 
Yes, I do buy CD's. One of my latest is Motley Crue: Red, White, and Crue.
I'll be going to see their concert in Vegas later this year.
I met Nikki once and Tommy once. Going to try and meet Mick and Vince. 👍

I highly recommend a listening to the new CD is you're a fan of classic rock.
 
hatekore, please shut up, your talking crap. yes Phil was good in pantera, and did some cool stuff in Down, but that's about it. Pantera were influential on the metal scene, and that's about it. Barry Manilow LOL :D

So if I steal a crappy car - say a 5 year old Hyundai, instead of that new BMW - it's not theft, because it's inferior? That makes no sense. It's still theft. Videotaping first-run movies with a handheld camera in the theatre is still theft, even though it's inferior quality. How is this different?

Well if I've paid to see the movie, then i should be able to tape it for personal viewing as is done on TV and VCR's ;).
 
Might as well have a post in this thread as it was intended hehe..

I've downloaded copius amounts of music in the past but as I'm now employed full-time it's much easier for me to buy music of which I've been doing quite a lot lately.

I've also noticed that I prefer to have the albums in my car (new car and a better sound system) I prefer to have CD quality music playing in my car, when downloading mp3s I found it hard to ensure that I got a good quality song. When I buy a CD I know it'll be perfect.

My head unit is MP3 capable, so having ripped all the albums (in VBR format) I've bought so far I might burn them all to an MP3 disc to as to cut down the amount of physical CDs I have in my car.

👍
 
I've also noticed that I prefer to have the albums in my car (new car and a better sound system) I prefer to have CD quality music playing in my car, when downloading mp3s I found it hard to ensure that I got a good quality song. When I buy a CD I know it'll be perfect.

Itunes = perfect high quality mp3's every time. Plus it's a hell of a lot cheaper.
 
danoff
Itunes = perfect high quality mp3's every time. Plus it's a hell of a lot cheaper.
Uhhh.... no. iTunes aren't even CLOSE to perfect quality. They're pretty much equivalent to 128kbps MP3s, like other online music stores, which is terrible quality. I delete songs that have that low of quality...
 
… if you're an audiophile. ;) I can tell you when one pixel's off on a computer screen, but I'll be damned if I can tell the difference between a 128kbps AAC file and a lossless format. My ears are no match for my eyes, so why bother with anything better?
 
Uhhh.... no. iTunes aren't even CLOSE to perfect quality. They're pretty much equivalent to 128kbps MP3s, like other online music stores, which is terrible quality. I delete songs that have that low of quality...

The stuff I get down from itunes is better than 128kbps - not that I can tell a difference beyond that anyway.

...and I didn't say they were perfect quality. I said they were perfect, high quality - meaning there is no corruption to the file (ever) and that the audio quality is high.
 
Sage
… if you're an audiophile. ;) I can tell you when one pixel's off on a computer screen, but I'll be damned if I can tell the difference between a 128kbps AAC file and a lossless format. My ears are no match for my eyes, so why bother with anything better?

I'm not an audophile by any means, but I do notice the difference between a 128kpbs file and something i've encoded myself.
 
If you pay attention, you'll probably notice the quality differences. There are lots of people who doesn't hear any differences though, and they don't care. Also, it's when you turn up the volume, you start to notice the quality.
 
a6m5
Also, it's when you turn up the volume, you start to notice the quality.

Which matters to me considering the more I turn up the volume, my 6.5" mids and tweets get more of the 120wrms my amplifier puts out.

Bad quality at high volume = 👎
Bad quality at high amplified volume = 👎👎
 
Well, I don't listen to music all THAT much so I don't need expensive "equipment" to listen to it. I'm just glad I can listen to it in some way.
 
I'm not an audophile by any means, but I do notice the difference between a 128kpbs file and something i've encoded myself.

You do? I'm not sure you do. Have you listened to the same clip in 128kbps and a higher rate side by side to compare using the same speakers? If you do notice the difference is this something that you'd notice without comparing it? Something that would bother you? Something that makes a big difference? Or are you just being an audio snob for the heck of it?

lso, it's when you turn up the volume, you start to notice the quality.

I have a nice system in my new car. I've cranked the hell out of itunes tracks in that car and I have yet to notice any problems. It sounds great.
 
danoff
You do? I'm not sure you do. Have you listened to the same clip in 128kbps and a higher rate side by side to compare using the same speakers? If you do notice the difference is this something that you'd notice without comparing it? Something that would bother you? Something that makes a big difference? Or are you just being an audio snob for the heck of it?
Yes. I can easily spot the difference between a 128kbps rip and my own VBR rip. I think its more apparent in bassier tracks as low frequencies tend to sound muddy with low bitrates such as 128. Also, with a good soundcard and high-quality headphones, the drop in quality is even more apparent.

Believe it or not, some people have ears that are more sensitive than yours. ;)
 
Yes. I can easily spot the difference between a 128kbps rip and my own VBR rip. I think its more apparent in bassier tracks as low frequencies tend to sound muddy with low bitrates such as 128. Also, with a good soundcard and high-quality headphones, the drop in quality is even more apparent.

I've heard them side by side and I'm not impressed with the difference.

Besides, Itunes uses a different format for their music. It's my understanding that the itunes format is equivalent to a 160 kbps mp3 - which must be why my itunes tracks sound great.
 
I haven't bought any cds recently - i used to just download for free, untill the other day when i recieved an email from the met police telling me they've recieved intelligence that i was illegally downloading mp3s, and that i must stop.

Fair enough, i had my fun, i'll probably register with itunes now.
 
ummm...i don't download music...only b/c i'm lazy, i don't want to sign up for those subscriptions sites, and...sometimes the quality isn't as good as the cd itself. but then again....i cheat a little. i let my boyfriend do the downloading, then i just copy the songs from his comp... he he...plus, i like the cover booklets that come w/ the cds, and i want to support the artists i listen to.
 
I do both.. but usually if I download it and like it, I buy it after anyway. If I don't like it, I hit delete, go to my desktop, and empty the recycle bin.
 
sumbodycool
I do both.. but usually if I download it and like it, I buy it after anyway. If I don't like it, I hit delete, go to my desktop, and empty the recycle bin.
Shift+Delete is quicker. ;)
 
silverstone
well, first off. I am really really against music pirating, and p2p networks. illegal downloading is killing the industry. If you only download music, you are helping the industry die. I know that the industry is still rich, but that wont last long if no one buys music legitimately. I dont download music, I wont steal a cd from the store, Im not going to steal one digitally.

i agree with you in principle silverstone, but there are two sides to every story.

the first, honest side.

i love music, whether it be classical, pop, rock, rap, reggae, or folk. i have a cassete cllection of 700+ original albums, many hundreds more on vinyl, and a cd collection of some 400 original cds. out of my collection, id say i have maybe 5 pirated cd albums - all given to me free by others. i regularly buy cds from stores, and on a whole id say im reasonably happy with my purchases, though the pricing system they sometimes use leaves me wondering. i recently brought the wall live in hmv for £10.99 in a sale. a great bargain. when i got home i flippedthe cd case over and there was a sticker on the back saying that the cd was orginally priced at £30.99! thats ridiculous, no scandalous! similarly i brought the original wall by pink floyd in sale, another double cd, i got that for £9.99. on the back the sticker said £26.99! thats why piracy exists, many people are unwilling to pay prices like that for cds, so they go else where, and i say good on them!

the second, dishonest side.

before you accuse me of killing off the music industry, hear me out. my biggest love in music is dance, and im not talking the dance you see advertised on tv. i have many albums on cd now that cannot be replaced through normal retail means - they've either been deleted, or the label that made them has stopped trading.

one of my favourite albums of all time is an old, early 90's dance album by 808 state called excel. i had many of the singles on cassette or cd, but i did not have the album, when i was 17, or 18 years old, i decided to go to the shop and buy it. i didnt buy it straight away, instead waiting a few months to buy it. that was my mistake. the album was only released in small numbers, and was deleted only 6 months after it was released. never to be heard of again.
how long do you think it took me to find that album available to buy in the shops? in the end, i found it going cheap in a second-hand shop clearout rack. how long had i waited to find it? 13 years! that stinks! i tried the record labels, and they were no help. i could of turned to the internet to find it, but i wanted the original cd in its original case. i eventually found it, but look how long i had to wait.

i find myself in a similar predicament again. i brought a carpenters double cassette when i was 10 years old in 1984. ive played it almost everyday, for the past 21 years, but alas it is at the end of its days. again i have tried to contact the record label to get another copy on cd, but all they did was transfer my call to HMV, who took my order, but sent me the wrong cd, thought it had the same name as the one i wanted!

i am a massive trance fan, and many of the tracks i listen to are never available for purchase in shops. what am i supposed to do? i get around this by ripping them from trance stations using station ripper. if thats illegal, im happy to be breaking the law. how else would i listen to the trance tracks i like? sure they release 'best ever trance' or 'now thats what i call trance', but thats for the non-believers, not the true clubber.

if im commiting piracy, its the fault of the music industry, and not me.
 

Latest Posts

Back