Do you miss Museum Cards?

[Ameer67]

If you guys remembered from GT5, there were these collectibles called Museum Cards. They gave little tidbits of information about a specific car or brand and usually a picture.

What I'm asking today is this; do you miss the museum cards? I say yes. It was nice knowing a cool and interesting fact about a car.

So, what do you think? Should they make a comeback or stay where they are right now - in GT5.

​

 

[G_Parrilla]

They were cool. Dont know why they aren't in GT6

 

[Mini Stiggy]

Yeah, they were pretty cool. If I was bored, and didn't know what to do, I would usually go look at them.

 

[DJTHEKING]

Just made the thread on suggestions

 

[ildd]

I'm indifferent. Though I like learning as much as I can about a car/brand, they seemed a little too excessive. Mainly because there were a lot of cards that weren't represented in the game.

 

[Raven_WET01]

No. If I want to know more about a car, I read the description. If I need even more info, I go to Wikipedia.

 

[GT5 Level 41]

No, in fact I believe they made the game run slower after you opened them. Can't prove it, just an observation.

 

[Tornado]

I could replicate the exact same experience (except with far more convenience, detail and accuracy) with a 10 second Google search. Their removal is no great loss, and hopefully allowed PD to focus on something more worth their time instead.

 

[Sage Ages]

No. If I want to know more about a car, I read the description. If I need even more info, I go to Wikipedia.

It had information on cars that weren't even in the game.


Also, Wikipedia sucks for cars.

 

[Zenmervolt]

While I agree that the loss of the cards isn't huge, I did enjoy going through them on occasion. I certainly would not have otherwise randomly come across many of the photos used for the cards.

Still, I'd rather PD fix things like the camber bug or the post-pit-stop-tire-wear bug or the online-pit-stops-cause-stuttering bug than worry about putting cards back in.

 

[Tornado]

It had information on cars that weren't even in the game.


Also, Wikipedia sucks for cars.

I dunno how to tell you this, but the GT series is no bastion of credibility itself. At least when someone on Wikipedia makes up stuff outright, it's usually caught pretty quickly.

 

[Lawndart]

I liked them, they were classy and added some historical richness to the game.

GT 5 was a hodgepodge of little things that all added up, GT 6 is bare bones, no little cool flourishes like that.

 

[KinLM]

I liked them.

My problem was, PD put them in the game before a livery editor, speed test, online events, etc.

It was yet another case of poor time management for GT5.

Had GT5 been a complete game, I would've loved them without feeling like they didn't belong.

If GT6 ever becomes a complete game, I would be happy to see them in an update.

 

[Devil240Z]

Would you want the same exact cards in GT6 cause thats 99% what we would have gotten.

 

[grant_turismo]

Do not miss. If they stop focusing on superfluous aspects like this, hopefully it will result in a more well rounded game for the next iteration of GT.

 

[forzaturismo]

no

 

[Madertus]

I liked them.

Some of pictures among these car(d)s were truly awesome. I especially liked those from late '80s-early '90s

 

[Freeman_Cruz]

I have not lost hope that the museum will be a part of the GT6 application for iOS and Android in addition to the guide Apex II, the car library and GPS course maker application.

 

[alex1369]

No, cuz i only went to 2 or 3 times to the museum cards libary...
Besides they take a lot on your gt5 game save data...

 

[XPOWER180]

No, they served no purpose to the gaming experience at all and some weren't even factually correct in relation to the given picture.

 

[Raggadish]

I have not lost hope that the museum will be a part of the GT6 application for iOS and Android in addition to the guide Apex II, the car library and GPS course maker application.

Speaking of which, where is that GT phone app? And where is the club update? It kinda feels like PD is back at their usual, delaying and not coming thru on stuff.

 

[hardvibes]

No.

 

[Outeke]

No. In GT5 it was a waste of space on the gamesaves. Which made the game loading times amazingly slow.

GT6 has a better gamesave structure but as suggested in previous posts. Use google if you want to know something 👍

 

[AudiMan2011]

No. They just cluttered up an already cluttered game in GT5. The car descriptions themselves already give plenty information.

 

[f1webberfan]

They were nice addition to GT5.
But to be honest I spent like ... 1/2 hour looking and reading at them ... so if I'm honest - no.

 

[xSNAKEx]

No, in fact I believe they made the game run slower after you opened them. Can't prove it, just an observation.

No it definitely did. Some people even reported it corrupting their saves and messing with other stuff.

 

[HOODFIELD]

Yes, miss the collecting aspect of them. Where's the poll?

 

[dQuim]

I think I looked through them once. A nice idea, but they didn't add much to the game. I think PD had bigger fish to fry this time around.

 

[HBR-Roadhog]

Nope not really, They were kinda cool, I actually looked at a few of them but for the most part they seemed to be a waste.

 

[MenocidiX]

Yes, miss the collecting aspect of them. Where's the poll?

That's the part i disliked, playin GT5 for 4 years ends up with a huge amount of duplicates and missing ones. If PD would tie them to the carreer (win with car X, recieve related card/s), it would be more interesting.