Yes it is, because most people who put LSxx in their car are looking for power and torque.Yeah I guess a powerful, lightweight, versatile, reliable, and well supported engine is just too easy.
![]()
It's pretty hard to argue against an LS swap except in terms of aesthetics... and yet, it's hard to find anyone who doesn't find the aural signature of an uncorked V8 pleasing.
Sad for import lovers, but the US drift scene is slowly but steadily heading towards LS swaps. They're light, powerful, torquey and reliable... especially at the high-stress low-speed workouts they get in drifting.
Time attack is still the domain of 4G63Ts, though...
SlashfanLSx's aren't the only engines known for those standards either though, some Mopars and Fords aren't anything to laugh about in that sense.
It's pretty hard to argue against an LS swap except in terms of aesthetics... and yet, it's hard to find anyone who doesn't find the aural signature of an uncorked V8 pleasing.
Sad for import lovers, but the US drift scene is slowly but steadily heading towards LS swaps. They're light, powerful, torquey and reliable... especially at the high-stress low-speed workouts they get in drifting.
Time attack is still the domain of 4G63Ts, though...
The 460 Cobra Jet and the 351 Windsor are the two Ford engines that I respect a lot.
Yes it is, because most people who put LSxx in their car are looking for power and torque.
Dont get me started on the drifters that use it just so they can drift competitively.
It's an easy way out in terms of power, money and torque.
Im sure you can get a LSxx cheaper than building an SR of the same price.
I could be wrong about that though.
so how am I wrong?
plus all the things you name, make it sound easy so?
I'm sorry I'd rather have a SR20DET in my 240sx, rather than a LSxx