There's an interesting article at http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns05125.html regarding Vodaphone's losses and the cost of their sponsorship of Ferrari.
There was a comment toward the end of the article,
'However the Sunday broadsheet then goes on to say "For that they could have a team named after them - and a big team at that. Orange got a much better deal commercially with the Arrows F1 team for £80 million," which equals $116m.
Not a considered comment, one would have thought, bearing in mind the relative status of the Ferrari and Arrows team - nor the amount of global TV time they respectively command.'
Now, I don't know about you, but I am a lot more conscious of Orange's sponsorship of Arrows than I was of Vodaphone's Ferrari support (in fact, I thought they were still with Benetton!).
I'd be interested to hear other people's comments.
There was a comment toward the end of the article,
'However the Sunday broadsheet then goes on to say "For that they could have a team named after them - and a big team at that. Orange got a much better deal commercially with the Arrows F1 team for £80 million," which equals $116m.
Not a considered comment, one would have thought, bearing in mind the relative status of the Ferrari and Arrows team - nor the amount of global TV time they respectively command.'
Now, I don't know about you, but I am a lot more conscious of Orange's sponsorship of Arrows than I was of Vodaphone's Ferrari support (in fact, I thought they were still with Benetton!).
I'd be interested to hear other people's comments.