- 192
- United Kingdom
What a nutcase!Whoosh
I was just referencing this numbn**s of a Mercedes fanboy from last year:
![]()
What a nutcase!Whoosh
I was just referencing this numbn**s of a Mercedes fanboy from last year:
![]()
Poe's law.Whoosh
I was just referencing this numbn**s of a Mercedes fanboy from last year:
![]()
Okay, why?The Maserati Bi-Turbo in Touring Car Racing in the late-1980s.
We could do with "Why" being part of the rules for this thread. Expand on why it's a failure because then we can have a discussion about it, rather than a lack of context statement.Okay, why?
Absolutely. It's just confusing and annoying otherwiseWe could do with "Why" being part of the rules for this thread. Expand on why it's a failure because then we can have a discussion about it, rather than a lack of context statement.
That's actually a good idea. I only didn't elaborate right away because I had a long day yesterday and I was really tired.We could do with "Why" being part of the rules for this thread. Expand on why it's a failure because then we can have a discussion about it, rather than a lack of context statement.
Well, the Maserati Biturbo was certainly a failure in the British Touring Car Championship. Appearing regularly over the course of the 1988 and 1989 seasons in the hands of Trident Motorsport, the Maserati's best result was 14th at Brands Hatch in 1988 and was usually seen either retiring or fighting with the lower classes, despite being in the same class as the Ford Sierra Cosworth.Okay, why?
Brabham/Gordon Murray arguably went down that road even earlier in the 70's with the BT42/44s.Lambo tried it first. Made their car look like F3 and was about as competitive.
![]()