Famine's Review: Timeline

  • Thread starter Thread starter Famine
  • 8 comments
  • 387 views

Famine

GTP Editor, GTPEDIA Author
Administrator
Messages
89,902
United Kingdom
Rule 12
Messages
GTP_Famine
Oooooooo-kay then.

Timeline - a time travel film starring Billy Connolly. Decent enough start.

Oh no! Downhill fast!

We start off with someone cropping up dead and it's quickly covered up by a hush-hush corporate plot... Only it turns out that the company actually only make a 3D fax machine (read "teleporter") and have accidentally found a way to go back in time to a specific point (in 1357).

Handily a group of archaelogical students is doing a dig at a site where a huge battle between the French and English will take place, 6 hours ahead of the specific time the Fax Machine sends things to. And even more handily, the company is funding the dig. Then, oh no! The head of the dig site - Billy Connolly - gets teleported back in time accidentally to 1357 France.


Yep - that's precisely the level of sophistication we get here. Everyone's aware that the English are at war with the French, Scots and indeed anyone else, but nonetheless send back a party consisting of a Frenchman, two Scots ("I'm from Scottish"... oaf) and several Americans, whose accents are never mentioned. Everyone apart from the girl, Billy Connolly, that bloke out of F&F/2F2F and the bloke who is apparently from Scottish gets killed in the next 25 minutes, which is a bonus because the director can't cope with more than one storyline at a time.

Lots of things happen that were predestined to - someone breaks a mural, just as they found at the dig site! The professor leaves his glasses behind, just as they found at the dig site! Marek (great Scottish name, Andre Marek) gets his ear cut off, just as they zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.


Paul Walker gets some great lines in - "We've got 650 years of technology on these guys, we'll be out of here in no time". Yep, except you're not carrying any technology and they use big-ass weapons you have no knowledge of. And there's TWO (count 'em) armies.

Key questions for anyone who had anything to do with the movie:
1. A Fax machine that accidentally opens a wormhole? Come ON.
2. An archaeological student who naturally knows all about time travel...
3. Paul Walker?
4. What was with the grenade? When the machine was blown up it didn't ADD to the tension - it made me actually happy that they weren't coming back. And what was wrong with the second machine in New York, precisely?

The film was directed by the guy who did Lethal Weapon, written (well, the book was) by the guy who wrote Jurassic Park and cost EIGHTY MILLION DOLLARS (compare to LOTR:TTT which cost $90m).


Utter, utter dross. And unlike the Matrix: Revolutions and Kill Bill, which I expected to be awful and wasn't disappointed, this film had no preconceptions attached to it at all. Don't. Under any circumstances.
 
Just step way the hell away from the movie and read the novel - I learned that lesson after Jurassic park 3 when Crichton's visions were no longer existant in the whole scheme of things. I read it when it first came out, it wasn't too bad though #2 and #4...hell, all of it is explained much better in Crichton's own words in the novel. If he had a more involved role in the movie, I'm sure it would have been a good watch.
 
I've heard similar things, but I read Crichton's Jurassic Park and The Lost World before I saw either film and wasn't impressed with his writing style either... Hard man to please... :D

I was thinking the other day about how many watchable DVDs I've seen in the last 12 months - and my girlfriend gets two every Friday night. I couldn't come up with even one. The last non-LOTR film I watched first time that registered on my plus-o-meter was "Mystery Men"...


The grenade was the most baffling part of the film (and there were many). We were both watching, and unless we both had a petit mal at the same time, we missed what actually happened... No-one was allowed to take any weapons in case of... "errors" I assume. But one guy takes a grenade, but then he pulls the pin AS he's pressing on his marker? What a numbnuts.
 
You might like Crichton's older books better... Prey follows his old style too though it wasn't as good as the older ones.

For great dvds...hmm...only one comes to mind for me and that would be Bourne Identity and that's only because the novel was so damn good :p. I don't think, in the past year or so, I've seen ANY movie that I can just go off on a limb and call "great". LOTR was a cinematic masterpiece but was in no way an original idea. There were LOTR movies prior but none recieved international recognition the way Peter Jackson's did. Minority Report was only ok and IMO very overrated b/c of Speilberg and Cruise, same with the entire Matrix trilogy......wow, no matter how hard I rack my brain, not one hollywood movie from the last several years comes to mind as being a great movie (Braveheart and one or two others whose names I forget excepted).

:odd: wow, I've been forgetting a lot of things lately
 
The book was a lot better as is usually the case. When I saw that Paul Walker was going to be in the movie, I lost all hope in the movie being any good. The only Crichton book-turned-movie that was any good was Jurassic Park.

Sphere was a great book, but the movie (while having a great cast) sucked.

The Lost World....I don't think I need to comment on that (they set a T-Rex loose in San Diego for crying out loud).

Rising Sun was fairly bleh....

Timeline was horrible.

Did they make an Andromeda Strain movie?

I hope they don't make a Prey movie. It can't get much worse than the book.



-Mark
 
The quality of the book is leaps and bounds ahead of this turd of a movie. I stopped watching half-way through this movie and started to play my Gameboy.

Gameboy is the best thing when being dragged to ****ty movies by friends.
 
Originally posted by Famine
Marek (great Scottish name, Andre Marek)
Haw, I know an Andre Marek. And his 2 brothers, Hans and Gerhard. :rolleyes:

Originally posted by Famine
The last non-LOTR film I watched first time that registered on my plus-o-meter was "Mystery Men"...
:D
 
I actually have this movie rented and sitting on top of the DVD playing, ready to be watched. Would you say I shouldn't waste my time to do something else, or would you say is has 2 hours of entertainment value, but definately don't plan on buying it?
 
don't plan on buying for sure. The book struck my interest because of how much it went on about quantum physics and because Crichton was one of my favourite writers at the time. The book was good but not great - it kept me occupied for a few days. I'm not so sure about the movie.
 
Back