- 1,264
- coming soon
- Tezuka18
my favorite would be takuma sato. untapped potential being restricted by crap racecars.
my favorite would be takuma sato. untapped potential being restricted by crap racecars.
He drove the car that finished second in the 2004 Constructor's Championship, yet the best he could do was a single third place. I think his potential was shown that season.
SA might not even make it to the next race....
---------------------------------------------------
Takuma Sato, shown at the Malaysian Grand Prix, is one of the Super Aguri team's drivers. The team may be done since a buyout plan has collapsed.
Formula One's Super Aguri team faces doubts about its future after a Middle East-based investment group withdrew its offer to buy the team.
"Super Aguri F1 Team confirms that it has been informed by Magma Group, the potential purchasers of the team, that its investors no longer wish to fund the intended acquisition," the team said in a statement. "It is with deep regret that [team owner] Aguri Suzuki is now forced to consider the future of the team, however negotiations with other parties continue."
The deal's collapse means that Super Aguri's participation in next weekend's Spanish Grand Prix is unlikely, unless long-time backer Honda steps up to support it enough to allow it to compete.
---------------------------------------------------
source:
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080416/FREE/354854363/1065
He drove the car that finished second in the 2004 Constructor's Championship, yet the best he could do was a single third place. I think his potential was shown that season.
I always rooted for Minardi, and few things made me happier than seeing them score a point.
Minardi were brilliant. Such a small engineering team, it was amazing that they managed to survive so long into the modern era of F1. I was really sad when they had to pull out.![]()
PeterJB has it spot on. He has the talent, maybe even that of Hamilton. Put him in a top 3 car and he will contest the championship, give him 2 years.
I bet they had him sign a contract that stated he could be sued if he didn't follow team orders
Yes I know I'm just blowing my own countries trumpet but Jordan were always my favorite underdog. And they were quite good for a few years in the late 90's they finished 3rd in the constructors in 1999 and gave Micheal Schmacer his first race in Belgium. Didnt they give Eddie Irvine, Rubens Barrachello and Fisichello their first drives or am I wrong? Also they were an extremely clever team even towards the end fighting for survival with little or no money Fisichello still managed to win that crazy Brazillian GP in the rain in I think in 2003. The best part was when Eddie Jordan had to start a fight with the officials after the race because they awarded the win to Kimi Rakkionen because of confusion over the race having to be stopped but Eddie had his evidence and McLaren had to hand the trophy over.
Its a pity Damon was absolute crap in Jordan, with only that one Belgium GP in 1998 being a good drive, when the rest of the field were taken out on the first lap (albeit, most were able to race again with spare cars). You could say he was almost better off at Arrows!
Still, Frentzen showed what Jordan's could do back then, that was great.
I never really seen Hill as a great driver, albeit I didnt watch or know much about F1 in the early to mid nineties. I always thought it was more a case of he was in the right car at the right time in 1996, but I'm probably not giving him fair recognition. But like you said Frenzten was good, I remember one of his wins in the old Hockinheim. But they really fell down hill from 2000 onwards, E.Jordan had some row with Frenzten and that was the start of the trobble as well as money issues.
E.Jordan is still active though in the Irish WRC organisation and he's showing his greatness again because next year Ireland host the first round of the WRC. I'll be there hopefully!!
Well, put it this way, Hill gave himself the great car....his greatest asset was the fact he was one of the best test drivers at the time, and because he was test driver for Williams, he ended up with the best car on the grid in 1994, 1995 and 1996.
In this sense, I think its a little unfair to judge his skill with a handicap of "the best car". He did show his skill at driving when he took that Arrows to the podium at Hungary 1997! That was Arrows' only other best result (the other being also a second place early on in their constructor's life).
The main reason I reckon Damon was a bit naff with Jordan was because of his lack of determination and enthusiasm at the time. He clearly felt he had lost his touch at the time and wasn't putting the effort in. That and he was just at that time in a F1 drivers life, I mean, Mansell was a good driver, but he was pathetic at times later on in his career even though he had a good car. I also seem to remember Damon had fallen out over the team about something as well, like Frenzten.