Ford GTX1 (GT Roadster)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Layzie
  • 36 comments
  • 2,160 views
Messages
455
Messages
hurcon1
Article

dsfordgtroadster2nk.jpg


Interesting, might I say.
 
Another chassis compromise mission to destroy a perfectly ok design! Way to go Ford! May be a Ford GT-150 truck next year!? Yeah, that's gonna sell cause Americans like TRUCKS!!!
 
Doesn't look TOO bad.
The original design is still superior, as with most cars turning convertible. (IMO)
 
If Ford has their heads screwed on straight about the history of the X1 version of the original GT40, they won't bother with this.

The original X1 was an attempt to make the 427 powered GT40 lighter through an aluminum frame, open cockpit body, Hewland gearbox, and sundry other modifications. The project was a success on paper, dropping the GT40's weight a full 1000lbs, but success eluded the car on track.

Most of its time was spent as a testbed for the GT40. It was instrumental in creating the J car (which eventually became the MkIV), and even scored a win in the 1966 Sebring 12hour race. However, it also proved that an open cockpit GT40 would be a miserable failure in Can Am competition when compared to the McLaren M8A and Lola T70 MkIII Spyder, as even at 1900lbs it was too heavy.

Ford ultimately destroyed the X1, but the car (which had testing and revision from Kar Kraft, Holman & Moody, Shelby American, and McLaren) had served its purpose as a testbed and as a technical success, but minor failure.

To bring back the X1 name, just to put it on a roadster GT, would be a little hokey. Besides, that concept looks nothing like the original.

PicFetch
 
Wow I like it, a lot. If I had hundreds of thousands of dollars to blow on a car I wouldn't mind owning one of those bad boys.

And YW there is a GT-150 just so you know, it comes in the GT's color schemes.
 
Didn't YW say the F-150 wasn't a truck?


Interesting, but no. Something doesn't look right.
 
Young_Warrior
Another chassis compromise mission to destroy a perfectly ok design! Way to go Ford! May be a Ford GT-150 truck next year!? Yeah, that's gonna sell cause Americans like TRUCKS!!!
You do understand, they still do make the regular closed-top version. You understand that right??? So what if they make a topless version. Don't like it, don't buy it. It's just options. If given the choice, I'd take the closed-top version, but I like the look of the roadster.

And yes, we like trucks over here. We get good use out of them. Now, the SUV thing, thats another story. But, a good deal of the pickup trucks sold here are for work related uses.

Hilg
 
Young_Warrior
Yeah, that's gonna sell cause Americans like TRUCKS!!!

I live in America and I don't like trucks. Some of my friends are Americans and they do not like trucks. Don't generalize Americans as some hill billy truck having cousin marrying people. I may be German but I've lived in this country all my life and I don't like pickup trucks. So take that generalization and stuff it.
 
Would've preferred it with a roof hoop over each door. And I agree with LK... shame to dredge up that name for a mere roadster version.
 
JCE3000GT
I live in America and I don't like trucks. Some of my friends are Americans and they do not like trucks. Don't generalize Americans as some hill billy truck having cousin marrying people. I may be German but I've lived in this country all my life and I don't like pickup trucks.-.

Because your german.

Also what I said above I copied and pasted from the forum from the source's website.
 
Young_Warrior
Because your german.

Also what I said above I copied and pasted from the forum from the source's website.

1. STOP copying and pasting text from other websites without using the quote BBS code or italics, or even a note or comment of your own about it. Seriously.

2. Not all americans like trucks. What if I said that all British people like ****ty cars that fall apart if you sneeze at them? :rolleyes:

@JNasty4G63: A lot of trucks are used for their true purpose, yes, but ya gotta admit that there's a lot of trucks that aren't.... :dunce:
 
:lol: I am surprised that people didnt clock on that those letters werent from my thoughts. Firstly I dont type like that I just kinda found it amusing and I wanted to see what people would say but if I did mention that its just a qoute from another person no one would have paid it any mind.
 
People will notice if you mention it's a quote even if they already know that it is. They just don't need to talk about it. If you don't credit your source in some way your not only not being looked on favourably by other users but your also breaking the law.
 
Wolfe2x7
1. STOP@JNasty4G63: A lot of trucks are used for their true purpose, yes, but ya gotta admit that there's a lot of trucks that aren't.... :dunce:
Oh, totally. There are lots of every car that aren't used as intended. But, as I said the first time, a good deal of the trucks sold here in the states are for work. Not all or most, but a very good deal. I don't think I could count how many pickups I see every day that have some construction/telcom/delivery business logos stamped all over them. Lots of them around.

Hilg
 
Click for pictures.

LAS VEGAS, Nov. 1, 2005 – With the 1966 Sebring-winning Ford GTX1 roadster as inspiration, Ford SVT engineering supervisor Kip Ewing unveiled his take on that legendary racer during the opening day of the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA) show. Ewing conceived the idea for a roadster while working on the Ford GT launch, and after completing initial design sketches and engineering studies on his own time, he won the privilege of utilizing the Ford’s SEMA Technology Initiative to bring the Ford GTX1 roadster to life.

“The Ford GT has been an amazing automotive icon that I’ve had the pleasure to work on,” said Ewing. “The X1 project is a great way to answer the question, ‘What if?’ and utilize the power of the SEMA’s members in the aftermarket to get it done.

Ford’s SEMA Technology Initiative began in 1999 with the sharing of technical drawings and electrical schematics of the then-new Mustang. The program has expanded over the years to include the majority of Ford and Lincoln Mercury vehicles and now provides three-dimensional CAD data to aftermarket companies looking to develop parts and accessories. As part of Ford’s initiatives to promote its vehicles to SEMA members in the aftermarket, Ford supports a selection of project vehicles to be built every year for the SEMA Show, and the Ford GTX1 was one of them.

The builder chosen for the project is Mark Gerisch of Genaddi Design Group (www.vgdauto.com), an experienced designer and metal shaper that has a history of cutting the roofs off expensive and exotic cars. Ewing worked with Ford’s SEMA liaison team and Ford Corporate Design to bring the OEM perspective to the project, but working with Gerisch’s team in the aftermarket was critical for success.

“The Ford GTX1 project is a great example of manufacturers working together with the aftermarket to stretch the boundaries and investigate potential design and product innovation,” says Hau Thai-Tang, director, Ford SVT and Advanced Product Creation, and one of Ewing’s management supporters on the X1. “SEMA showcases trends in styling, accessories, and performance, and whether it’s a new Fusion, Mustang, F-150 or Ford GT, there is something new to be learned by going through this process.”

The X1 roadster features an innovative roof system of four individual hard panels. The panels can be configured as a coupe, t-top, or full convertible. Even with all the panels installed, the outer panels can be locked into a vent position. Plus, the panels are painted in the same Valencia Yellow featuring Tungsten Silver stripes; therefore, as a coupe, it doesn’t lose any of its design appeal. And, X1 drivers won’t be caught in the rain because all four panels can be stored inside the vehicle for easy access.

The Ford GTX1’s rear clamshell covering the engine has been redesigned to feature two buttresses that flow rearward from the seatbacks. Without the need for a backlight due to its open-top configuration, the view into the engine bay could have gone away, but Ewing knew the importance of showcasing the 550-horsepower 5.4L supercharged V-8.

The answer to the inevitable question of “Can I buy one?” is yes. All it will take is a trip to your local Ford dealer to purchase a Ford GT, and then a call to Genaddi Design Group, or visit www.gtx1.com.

Besides Genaddi Design Group, the Ford GTX1 features several SEMA-member company products, including:

* Wheels - 6061 Alloy Corporation 19-inch front/20-inch rear
* Seats - Sparco Carbon fiber Ford GT custom
* Brakes - Brembo Alum. mono-block/two-piece rotors
* Tires - Pirelli P-Zero Rosso
* Dampers - Dynamic Dampers Adjustable coil-overs
* Trunk - Multimatic Carbon Fiber
* Exhaust - Ford Racing – Borla
* Interior trim - WK Industries
* Paint - Debeers
* Roof latching- RMD
* Clam shell cassette - Manitowoc Composites
 
Why would it need a roof? It's a concept and its a roadster.
 
ok Look at the concept...

it's not a "convertible"..because there's an engine right behind the seat where a top would go..

Now..look at the seats construction..

meaning the roof would have some very very very awkward shapes/sizes to it..

which means it wouldn't fit under the very very small hood/boot of the Ford GT..

it has NO roof..

no rain driving....
no parking outside...etc etc etc..

NO roof
 
You don't need a roof, because a.) its a concept and b.) it was built as a true roadster. Plus you don't buy a car like that because it has an ounce of practicality.
 
Well the Murcielago/gallardo roadster are very unpractical..
but they have roofs..

So does the koenigsegg..

so does the Carrera GT...

yeah it's a concept..
an uglah concept with bad paint schemes...and no practicality
 
Aston Martin DB AR1: no roof
8951.jpg


550 Barchetta: roof-ish device
ferrari_550_barchetta.jpg


Murcielago Barchetta: roof-ish cloth bit, but it's getting there
lg_2-lg-16.jpg


Zonda Roadster: no roof
pagani_zonda_roadster.jpg


I love ALL those cars! They're great without roofs. Why does it matter how practical it is, we all know that someone with the kind of money to buy this car, if it were in production, could afford to drive something when it rained.
 
Back