- 3,055

- The Netherlands
- MarcoM1972
enjoyed that!I'm cracking open my Gulpener Gladiator as we type.
I cried. A lot.
What an afternoon
enjoyed that!I'm cracking open my Gulpener Gladiator as we type.
There's the rub really - Max won fair and square but Mercedes do have a point. Taking the win away from Max would be unfair but equally Toto does have a valid grievance with how Masi handled things. I saw in a Facebook group someone say the best solution would be to give Hamilton a five second penalty for the turn one incident and Max a five second penalty for 'overtaking' under the SC - problem solved really.Sensible ones probably are, absolutely. My problem isn't even with Max. He won fair and square, it's not his fault the FIA is a literal circus tent. Again, congrats to him. He's still way too abrasive/aggressive on track and I'd imagine it's only going to get worse from hereon but he does deserve the win. No question.
Won't get into the specifics of this and last race as it's pointless now. All I want is for Masi to kick rocks and never officiate an F1 race again. Not even in his own thoughts.![]()
Same here, teary eyes for a good hour and a half.enjoyed that!
I cried. A lot.
What an afternoon![]()
Max will have to be careful at the start of next year. He's up high on penalty points, and they're all recent. If he would continue his standards as the last few races, he'll be up to a race ban in no time.So at which race next season do we see the airplane crash (as Brundle terms it)? If Verstappen has a car at the pointy end he's going to drive in same stupidly aggressive way he has all this season. The other drivers know that now and any who are his direct competitors next year would be stupid not to call his bluff and just turn in rather than avoid the accident. I'm certain if Hamilton is up there again next season he won't put up with the same **** from Max he has this year.
They certainly screwed the Woolf anyway...Masi & the FIA aren't going to admit they screwed the pooch, lol.
Lewis got extremely lucky at Silverstone and indeed, had he not made that rookie error with the brake magic at Baku, he may have been in a better position. I agree the race restart wasn't the best way to end the championship but Lewis has had a fair amount of luck this season as well. Had he not been in the Merc he may not have won the last two championships - same goes for Schumi at Ferrari to be fair. Let's be honest due to the disparity between the cars F1 isn't a meritocracy in terms of driver talent - if it were Russell and Leclerc would have been fighting for race wins (and potentially championships) for ages now.When that "one race" is the final race with the incident taking place on the final lap for the Championship b/c the race director decided he should get a fair shot at Lewis, but no one is afforded that opportunity within' their own race:
Yes, it's the exact same amount of luck everyone is convinced Lewis has.
I think 2022 will be harder for Max due to the Russell factor, he's a young, aggressive racer as well and Max will have to be careful abut his penalty points. If Ferrari sort their act out Sainz and Leclerc could be in the mix as well. I feel that Ferrari's lack of pace in recent years has really paved the way for Red Bull to come back in a big way.Max will have to be careful at the start of next year. He's up high on penalty points, and they're all recent. If he would continue his standards as the last few races, he'll be up to a race ban in no time.
It all depends on how the new cars will do I guess. It's probably unlikely that they will be this close again next year. Question is just in whose favor it will be
After looking at the rules they absolutely have a case. What happened was objectively wrong and stinks of favoritism considering how soon after the decision was made after RB whining to them.Intention to appeal filed. Mercedes has 48 hours to decide whether it has a case worth escalating.
Problem with that is that a lot of incidents aren't nearly as clear-cut as that.Well for next year there needs to be some serious clarification and codification for penalties regarding on-track incidents, in the same way as for technical infringements i.e.:
Forcing a driver off-track with no contact: five-second time penalty
Forcing a driver off-track with contact: 10-second time penalty
Forcing a driver off-track with contact and inducing damage: drive-through penalty
Forcing a driver off-track with contact and inducing race-ending damage: 10-second stop/go penalty
Deliberately driving into another driver: disqualification
Doing away with direct radio to Masi/the FIA during races would help this I feel. However, having said that, how many referees have changed their position due to footballers crowding around them? My conspiracy theory is that it was all about wanting a race for the sake of drama and he had Liberty breathing down his neck. Now, don't get me wrong, I don't think it would have been sporting for the race to have been ended under a safety car but an instant red flag would have a) made things fairer and b) given some proper racing lenth wise.After looking at the rules they absolutely have a case. What happened was objectively wrong and stinks of favoritism considering how soon after the decision was made after RB whining to them.
Just like the FIA "engineered" Max's win today with their shenanigans?It's a huge achievement on Mercedes' part and will probably remain the ultimate F1 car but I'm more interested in driving ability deciding titles than pure engineering. The fact Racing Point could just copy the previous car last year and be challenging up top isn't good for the sport in my opinion. I think were it not for Schumacher's record people would be less emotional about this result though - that's really the big thing here at play in my opinion. Masi has to go though. I'd be astounded if he's still there next year.
Max Verstappen did not do anything wrong in this race. No, not even the lap one overtake.
Verstappen did not have the outright race pace today and he was lucky in that he had the appropriate track position and time gap to pit under the safety car but that sort of luck is what modern Formula 1 is built upon. For e v e r y driver. Specifically focusing on the end of the race itself, to penalise Verstappen, or any driver, for a potential prodecdural error on the part of the race officials when he himself as a driver did nothing wrong would be extremely unfair.
Edit: Criticism of the race officials and the sport's administration, and punishments and penalties thereof, are a different matter, which I'd have no problem agreeing to. It's been a horrible year for stewarding and it absolutely must be sorted out before next season.
I agree with Lewis having serious chops and, as I pointed out upthread he outperformed Seb in 2018 when the Ferrari seemed to be the best car. I'm hardly a hater but surely you have to agree the Merc's pace in the last two years was insane. I mean, Racing Point copied the 2019 car in 2020 and were able to storm ahead. I'm also not saying that today proves Max is the better driver. Ultimately, we'll never know as I doubt Hamilton will ever end up Red Bull or Max at Mercedes.Just like the FIA "engineered" Max's win today with their shenanigans?
Going back to the car, whether its well engineered or not, the driver is still a factor. Yeah Lewis won his championships in a great car, that doesn't change the fact that he drove the car to the end and won the races. You cannot just disregard the driver's ability just because they are driving a great car. If the driver was not relevant, than anyone could have done it but looking at Lewis record, I say that's not quite right because his abilities and speed, despite what many of his haters may think, have made the difference just like they would have made a difference again today had it not being for the FIA.
Also, I never said Max should be penalized no did I want that. I'm just really frustrated that a race that I had been so excited about and have been looking forward to watch so much ended in such fashion. Like I said before, I don't have a problem with him winning, I just feel like he didn't do it by merit because if you take out what the FIA did at the end, that race should have ended under the SC with Lewis winning it. Either way what's done is done, congrats to Max for winning his first championship and I'm sure he'll have a couple more. For me, I just wish it wasn't tinted with all the FIA controversy.
Fair point. But it still stands that teams should be able to base their decisions in these situations on a set of rules that they expect the FIA to follow. Massi can't just make crap up for the sake of "to have a race". Why wasn't Sainz allowed to race? He had 2 cars between himself and Max. There were 5 between Max and Lewis. His decision helped Max and punished Lewis. When decisions like this are made, they should only be made if they affect all drivers equally.Although I agree with most of what you said, I just wanted to point out a factual error in your reasoning. Mercedes could not pit Hamilton, because he was too close to Verstappen and would have lost track position. If the race had not been started again, he would have had no chance to win it back. Mercedes could not risk that. RB on the other hand had to risk it - they had the gap to the next car and couldn't lose anything by pitting. Both teams did not have a choice in the last SC period - they both had to do it that way.
Except it isn't. As pointed out by snowgt they couldn't have. In any case, they were still in the best posituion as - according to the rules and regulations - Massi had 3 options available to him.But that’s Mercedes’ own fault. They shot themselves in the foot by not immediately pitting Lewis when the SC came out; he was after all still in Sector 3. They could’ve stopped him, and might have come out ahead of Verstappen, even if Red Bull hadn’t stopped him.
It's amazing that the most talented drivers get paired with the most talented team's isn't it.I agree with Lewis having serious chops and, as I pointed out upthread he outperformed Seb in 2018 when the Ferrari seemed to be the best car. I'm hardly a hater but surely you have to agree the Merc's pace in the last two years was insane. I mean, Racing Point copied the 2019 car in 2020 and were able to storm ahead. I'm also not saying that today proves Max is the better driver. Ultimately, we'll never know as I doubt Hamilton will ever end up Red Bull or Max at Mercedes.
Lewis deserves those championships but 2019 and 2020 were easy wins (indeed he even missed a race last year due to Covid and still won). I'd put him equal with Schumacher personally in terms of skill - insanely talented but lucked out with the car to break records. The fact that so much was made of this title fight this year shows how bland F1 had become at the front of the grid in my opinion.
Where Max is remains to be seen - personally I don't feel he'll be on a winning streak a la Seb at Red Bull. I think Russell will probably win next year unless Mercedes fall off a cliff performance wise.
And exactly why Max's "championship" gets an asterisk. This is Prost-Senna '89 levels of insanity.Fair point. But it still stands that teams should be able to base their decisions in these situations on a set of rules that they expect the FIA to follow. Massi can't just make crap up for the sake of "to have a race". Why wasn't Sainz allowed to race? He had 2 cars between himself and Max. There were 5 between Max and Lewis. His decision helped Max and punished Lewis. When decisions like this are made, they should only be made if they affect all drivers equally.
Except it isn't. As pointed out by snowgt they couldn't have. In any case, they were still in the best posituion as - according to the rules and regulations - Massi had 3 options available to him.
1) Finish behind the safety car.
2) Try to allow the whole field to unlap and resume the race at the end of the following lap (if there are any left).
3) Resume racing as soon as the incident is cleared.
1 and 2, guarantee the win for lewis. Option 3 gives Lewis an advantage but he had that anyway as he had a healthy lead before the safety car. Max would still have the opportunity to try to chase him down on fresh soft tyres.
Instead Massi pulled option 4 from seemingly the depths of his own arse hole to allow only the cars inbetween Lewis and Max to unlap and to resume racing immediately.
This is wholly unacceptable and unprofessional. Massi has taken a decision that has massive implications on the basis of "he thinks it's best". Not for safety. Not according to the rules. Purely to see Max race Lewis in an unfair setting. It was not his decision to make and he needs to go.
It's still a bit of a lottery - look at Leclerc at Ferrari. One of the best drivers with one of historically the best teams (even as recently as 2018) but no championship in sight due to lack of development.It's amazing that the most talented drivers get paired with the most talented team's isn't it.
Changed, sorry for the mistake ✌️ ✌️What about the rest of the Netherlands?
It's not a lottery, outliers don't change the trend.It's still a bit of a lottery - look at Leclerc at Ferrari. One of the best drivers with one of historically the best teams (even as recently as 2018) but no championship in sight due to lack of development.
Engineers, both mechanical and aerodynamic, are worthy of just about as much praise as the drivers in the fastest branch of the autosport.It's a huge achievement on Mercedes' part and will probably remain the ultimate F1 car but I'm more interested in driving ability deciding titles than pure engineering. The fact Racing Point could just copy the previous car last year and be challenging up top isn't good for the sport in my opinion. I think were it not for Schumacher's record people would be less emotional about this result though - that's really the big thing here at play in my opinion. Masi has to go though. I'd be astounded if he's still there next year.