Voted yes, but I think we should wait, if Matterhorn is a disaster or not. That would be the obvious replacement.
Big #85 on the side of my C2 now.
Why not in keep BH loose Matterhorn and replace it with Bathurst?
Yes. Yes it is.Why not A1-Ring, that's not a historic track?
It shares a couple of straights with a historic track.Yes. Yes it is.
So does Silverstone but you're not arguing against that.It shares a couple of straights with a historic track.
I wouldn't have Silverstone on the schedule either, but that at least has a couple of turns in common with the olden days.(it's still a 🤬 track)So does Silverstone but you're not arguing against that.
(it's still a 🤬 track)
See, this is why you should've stuck with premiums and not made it look like ITCC.Or standards at all (ToCA12 cars)
I wish I could like this 10 times.It shares a couple of straights with a historic track.
Probably post ToCA, if lobby issue isn't persistent.Anyone testing tomorrow evening?
Probably post ToCA, if lobby issue isn't persistent.
Apparently, the lobby lists turn up empty for everyone.ToCA [sighs]. What lobby issues?
Can't see lobbies.ToCA [sighs]. What lobby issues?
I did...Check if Bathurst works for you @Furinkazen otherwise don't include it
I did...
Can't see lobbies.
It never raced though...Now the Jag XJ13 can look how it should have looked; with a number, as in a car that actually raced in the real WSC in 1966. THANK YOU PD!
It never raced though...