- 400

- Somewhere
- ThunderMarauder
The date thing, by the clock, says 16.
The last 16 was in December before the 2.02 update and the DLC.
Just bringing attention to it.
I'm assuming it is safe to say that it is going to be dynamic time. But what about weather? I'm guessing there will be weather by the night time screen shot.
Anyone know what the green figure 8/infinite emblem means? What mode of play would that be for?
Anyone who played Prologue would know that's the old "Free Run" logo (Or maybe it was the TT Demo). It's basically a mode that lets you do free run.
Since every track in GT5 that has day/night cycles also has weather, I would assume this track does as well.
EDIT: In fact, we know it does. The old Spec II trailer showed the X2011 in the rain on it I believe.
Anyone who played Prologue would know that's the old "Free Run" logo (Or maybe it was the TT Demo). It's basically a mode that lets you do free run.
Since every track in GT5 that has day/night cycles also has weather, I would assume this track does as well.
EDIT: In fact, we know it does. The old Spec II trailer showed the X2011 in the rain on it I believe.
Anyone who played Prologue would know that's the old "Free Run" logo (Or maybe it was the TT Demo). It's basically a mode that lets you do free run.
I'm not sure why you want weather on the test course, as it's only beneficial to run on the best possible condition. I can see day night cycle, but not weather.
A proper test course should always be wet.![]()
Anyone down for some 300 PP action on X Course?
Someone on another thread had suggested it's 15 miles long, I'm curious what kind of lap times we'll be seeing n the 500 PP range. I'll take a wild guess: 8 min laps.
A proper test course should always be wet.![]()
I'd be down for that, if it's 15mi long though I'd guess a 500pp car would lap it in about 5mins as the 24 Nürburgring is 16.123mi long with alot of turn's and doesn't take much longer than your estimate.
I still think they could have improved Machine Test one step further by introducing detailed acceleration data, braking tests, handling tests of different kinds, etc.
I still think they could have improved Machine Test one step further by introducing detailed acceleration data, braking tests, handling tests of different kinds, etc.
0-100 Km/h, 0-200 Km/h, 0-400m, 0-1000m, top speed, skidpad g acceleration, make me think... is this all for a feature it took over a year to implement? Either PD developers lack imagination or believe we're all dumb and can't handle too much information.