Gt3 Tears!!!

[breakpoint]

Yeah everytime i miss the last S liscense test by a hair

 

[scoobyonline200]

I'm goping to call major BS on this because no car in GT3 short of being a hybrid can do 49.xxx on Trial mountain, it's not actually possible for any of the cars to achieve that as they are in the game, unless there was a glitch and you ended up off the track and just cus half of it out.

um, ok did you have anything to do with the games development? How do you know for SURE that cars cant go that fast?

 

[TriplePlay]

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Guys, we're dealing with a pure genious....

Nobody here is going to believe that you got a 49.xxx on TM. The guys you read on those online places (which you don't care about) such as daboy and 3rdgen, they practice day in and day out, non-stop gt3. They know every trick of the trade, they are the shumaccers of F1, the Bond's of baseball, the Jordan's of basketball. They're the best of the best of the best. They can run consistent 50's at midfield, 55's at laguna, and 55's at apricot. Until you can prove (either with an x-port or a camera replay) that you have run a clean lap with any car (non-hybrid) that is close to those marks, do not say that you are better than them or that the cars are able to go that fast. If you think they can, PROVE IT.

I'm sure you're a good driver, and good luck to you in getting your 49 at TM.

 

[Famine]

um, ok did you have anything to do with the games development? How do you know for SURE that cars cant go that fast?

Do the maths.

These are the top 8 times at GT3Times.

1 0:57.193
2 0:57.271
3 0:57.390
4 0:57.402
5 0:57.453
6 0:57.829
7 0:57.908
8 0:57.922

Note that they are separated by 0.8s overall (1.3%). These times come from the quickest drivers on Earth - big p, Flinx, Scooby-Roo & Mr. Derek (F1 specialists), and Lightning. I've seen laps done by all those drivers. Now, you claim to be 14.5% quicker than ANY of them. These guys have been setting records - verified - since GT3 came out.

It's not happening. Ever.

For note, 57.193s is an average speed of 155.47mph. 49.955s is an average speed of 178.00mph.

You are now just lying. I figure you have two choices - admit it and pretend you were just trying to wind us up, or you'll get banned. Hell, as soon as neon_duke or GoKents see this thread you'll probably be banned anyway - and your IP address will be logged and circulated to every other major GT board on the planet with the phrase "Ban this guy on sight - he's a liar".

 

[scoobyonline200]

I dont follow GT3 Times that whole site is a bunch of bull, who made them the WORLD record keepers?

 

[scoobyonline200]

You are now just lying. I figure you have two choices - admit it and pretend you were just trying to wind us up, or you'll get banned. Hell, as soon as neon_duke or GoKents see this thread you'll probably be banned anyway - and your IP address will be logged and circulated to every other major GT board on the planet with the phrase "Ban this guy on sight - he's a liar".

Good thing I have the opp to change my IP address whenever I feel like it. And get info on any other IP I want.

 

[TriplePlay]

*report* clickedy-click click

 

[NoQuarter]

I dont follow GT3 Times that whole site is a bunch of bull, who made them the WORLD record keepers?

Between GT3Times and Racing-Line, they pretty much are the World Record keepers, by popular consent.

Also, most of their records are verified, meaning the the driver took the time and effort to obtain the proper hardware and software to copy the saved lap off of their memory card, and sent it to the site reviewer(s) who inspect the run for cleanliness as well as whether a legal (non-hybrid for non-hybrid time) car was used.

There is no way you ran anything close to a 49 without using a hybrid. It cannot be done. Period.

Also, admitting things like being able to "change my IP address whenever I feel like it. And get info on any other IP I want" is not a good way to endear yourself to the site owner.

 

[MINI Addict]

On the super Speedway Endurance, I was on lap 100/100 and in front, I had a 3 second lead on the other car, on the last corner I went to close to the inside wall and hit the little stack of tires on the final straight and my car flew back and I came in last, all of the other 99 laps wasted.

 

[Famine]

Between GT3Times and Racing-Line, they pretty much are the World Record keepers, by popular consent.

Also, most of their records are verified, meaning the the driver took the time and effort to obtain the proper hardware and software to copy the saved lap off of their memory card, and sent it to the site reviewer(s) who inspect the run for cleanliness as well as whether a legal (non-hybrid for non-hybrid time) car was used.

There is no way you ran anything close to a 49 without using a hybrid. It cannot be done. Period.

Also, admitting things like being able to "change my IP address whenever I feel like it. And get info on any other IP I want" is not a good way to endear yourself to the site owner.

^What he said.

So, we can assume that you're lying out of your arse then, scoobyonline200? And please, tell me what my IP is - feel free to post it in this thread.

I dont follow GT3 Times that whole site is a bunch of bull

Irony for Dummies.

 

[Duke]

Good thing I have the opp to change my IP address whenever I feel like it. And get info on any other IP I want.

Yup, and we have the option to find out every new IP you come back with, and ban a whole range of IPs, and publish them to other board administrators for their information.

There's nothing wrong with the original thread topic. However, you will not survive as a member here if you lie, and you will be prohibited from entering any of our online racing events. We will also alert other stewards who host OLR events, so they know as well.

You may not care how your times stack up against other people who are independently verified as extremely fast players. That's up to you. But if that's true, then do not ever post a lap time anywhere on this site. If you're that good, then that's great for you. But until you submit a verification replay to a third party for proof, nobody wants to hear you talk about it.

Now. You've been accused of lying here and in the Skyline thread. If you expect to have any credibility on this forum, it's time for you to offer proof or be quiet. How you play it is up to you, but I'll remind you of these rules, to which you agreed when you signed up:

* You will not post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate.

Be aware that this is a well-established community. Liars are not welcomed by staff or citizens - they tend to disrupt things. And when disruption centers around a person who is violating clear rules, that person is invited to leave.

 

[phantasm]

^ well said neon.

This dude's punter-tastic. He most likely thinks GT3Times is crap b/c you actually have to PROVE your lap times.

 

[scoobyonline200]

^ well said neon.

This dude's punter-tastic. He most likely thinks GT3Times is crap b/c you actually have to PROVE your lap times.

ok I didnt know that,....how do you proove your lap times?

 

[Famine]

Oh for pities' sakes...

The first step - a sort of short way - is to go to the Replay Analyser and provide times for each Sector of the lap as given in the Analyser. This is generally used as a quick rule of thumb and helps, but doesn't strictly prove anything.

The only bona fide way to prove a time is to upload the replay file to your PC using a device called an "X-Port", or "Sharkport", or the new "Max Drive". Don't confuse these with cheat cartridges like the Gameshark or AR Max - they are totally different. The Xport/Sharkport cost around £15 ($27 US) and, by allowing you to use your PC as a memory card, eliminate the need to buy another memory card when one is full, or choose which files to delete.

The file can then be sent to a "trusted" verifier in your region - NTSC (North America, Japan) replay files cannot be viewed by PAL (Europe, Rest of the World) machines, and vice versa - who will download the file to his/her PS2 and watch it. If the replay passes muster then it is verified. Who is trusted? Good question - there is a core of about 50 drivers who regularly provide replay files and send them amongst themselves and they all check each other.

If you have no Xport/Sharkport, you can send your memory card to one of the verifiers. You will get it back.

Bear in mind that at GT3Times and Racing-Line, all laptimes must be done in single player mode, in non-hybrid cars and keeping at least some part of two tyres on or above the track at all times (including lines and rumble strip - but excluding grass and kitty litter) with absolutely ZERO contact with any walls/barriers/mountains. At Racing-Line all laptimes must be done in Free Run mode too - no in-race times.


But I wouldn't bother. There is no way you'll ever prove a 49.9 on Trial Mountain as a valid time.

 

[Duke]

At the very least, you need to submit the sector times, including maximum and average speeds from each sector, taken from an analyzer breakdown of the lap replay.

For something like your claim - 8 seconds faster than the fastest verified records in te world - you'd need to submit a Sharkport/X-port file of the replay. A Sharkport is not a Gameshark. It's a device that lets you save memory card information to a PC. So you would save the fast lap replay to your PC as if your PC was a giant memory card. Then you would email your replay file to bobkart or whoever is doing verifications at GT3Times.

They will review the file, checking for hybrids first, and making sure the lap is clean, with no wall touches, AI contact, grass cutting, or runoffs. Believe me, the OLR world is based entirely on trust, and these people can quickly and thoroughly determine if a replay is genuine or not.

 

[Famine]

George, George, George of the Jungle... Watch out for that tree!

 

[scoobyonline200]

keeping at least some part of two tyres on or above the track at all times (including lines and rumble strip - but excluding grass and kitty litter) with absolutely ZERO contact with any walls/barriers/mountains

ok, well then I guess I cant use my time, in 2 occations I did cut, on the last turn the short kinda banked (I THink) turn before the chicane, the car went over the grass and onto the track again, but either it had a glitch or something becuase arent the cars suppose to slow down and not speed up or anything like that? I didnt see this as a problem cuz I just having fun with the car. But cutting clear OFF the track dosent count? so waht about this though.... on some corners if you use the apex (F.I.A Curbing) strip,the car will turn better right? or do have to avoid using them at all?

 

[scoobyonline200]

At the very least, you need to submit the sector times, including maximum and average speeds from each sector, taken from an analyzer breakdown of the lap replay.

For something like your claim - 8 seconds faster than the fastest verified records in te world - you'd need to submit a Sharkport/X-port file of the replay. A Sharkport is not a Gameshark. It's a device that lets you save memory card information to a PC. So you would save the fast lap replay to your PC as if your PC was a giant memory card. Then you would email your replay file to bobkart or whoever is doing verifications at GT3Times.

They will review the file, checking for hybrids first, and making sure the lap is clean, with no wall touches, AI contact, grass cutting, or runoffs. Believe me, the OLR world is based entirely on trust, and these people can quickly and thoroughly determine if a replay is genuine or not.

I've seen Video footage of replay's,,how do you get those on to your PC?

 

[Dave A]

Your allowed to put two wheels off the track, not all four, the rummble strips (the red and white curbs) are classed as part of the track.

 

[Duke]

I've seen Video footage of replay's,,how do you get those on to your PC?

Quit jacking us around and go update your blog, since you haven't entered anything since April 29th. Both Famine and I answered the questions you just asked in the very text that you quoted from us. Read that again.

 

[NoQuarter]

With $20 million, you could probably buy the company that makes the Sharkport...

 

[Famine]

There's only three cuttable corners on Trial Mountain - and one which you can cut but it'll throw you airborne. There's also a wall-ride barrier. But even THAT won't get you 8s on the record.

You're full of it. And the "it" happens to rhyme.

 

[scoobyonline200]

There's only three cuttable corners on Trial Mountain - and one which you can cut but it'll throw you airborne. There's also a wall-ride barrier. But even THAT won't get you 8s on the record.

You're full of it. And the "it" happens to rhyme.

thats the thing, look im in a loosing argument and i wont reply no more, but the thing is that instead of getting airborn the dam thing giggled or fizzed and whatever, and like sped up really quick, and thats what the thing that caused me to hit the hill was. But I mean Im gonna go back and re do the math on it, and see if it really was "48" like it 1st came out to be. But I bet your all right and Im wrong. sorry for making a mess of these great forums.

 

[TriplePlay]

 

[scoobyonline200]

--

 

[Duke]

Look: everybody here - Famine included (right, Famine?) - is willing to accept you as a member. But so far you're approaching it wrong. Nobody wants to hear tall tales about $20 million and magic sub-50-second laps. It's not going to impress anybody, and it's going to make people mad to think you believe we're stupid enough to buy a story like that.

If it was something weird or a glitch, all you had to do was say that. Instead, you approached it as if it was a real lap that was messed up by a mistake. You've seen the reaction, and you're at least acting like it bothers you.

So, I'm going to close this thread, I'm going to close your Skyline thread, and I'm going to suggest that you introduce yourself again and we'll all give it another try based on that.