Originally posted by Driftster
I love how people compare BAD handling cars....to TANKS...which actually handle EXTREMELY well....better than most cars....
Originally posted by live4speed
Tanks can turn on a penny, they out handle a London taxi Black cab.
Originally posted by ving
nah the race vers looks wicked.
i want one now![]()
Originally posted by DODGE the VIPER
I think the hubcaps were the first thing that struck me, even though I don't usually look at the wheels...the race car has a much more aggressive look (as it should).![]()
Definitely the XJ200 Race Car. The GT40 sucks. Just ask Flerbizky, he'll agree with me.Originally posted by NISM0F0
which is better IN YOUR OPINION. im curious because im almost done with the GT World Championship in PRO and not sure which one to keep.
It does ?... I have never EVER heard of hubcaps on a racing car... (Can't even imagine a hubcap that'll stay put at 300+ km/h)Originally posted by Civic_VTi
4z, they may well be hubcaps. The XJ220 was supposed to be a supercar, so using hubcaps to improve aerodynamics makes sense.
Even with the technology in the days of the XJ220, I highly doubt that... So I ask - Who or what is gonna support what you wrote ?The hubcaps+rim are also lighter than a rim of identical shape would be,
I agree. There is no hubcap in the history of mankind that will stay on at 300kmh+, doing more than 5000 revs for the length of an entire race.Originally posted by Flerbizky
It does ?... I have never EVER heard of hubcaps on a racing car... (Can't even imagine a hubcap that'll stay put at 300+ km/h)
Even with the technology in the days of the XJ220, I highly doubt that... So I ask - Who or what is gonna support what you wrote ?