GT5 Driver's Insight (Reviews) Mitsubishi GTO SR.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skython
  • 54 comments
  • 7,236 views
Seeing as how your topic is called GT5 Driver's Insight, why not do a Honda Insight vs Toyota Prius comparison? :sly:👍

Ideas just flow in constant. Not all can be done. I will take this one and let SVX have the next full blown supercar.
 
Ideas just flow in constant. Not all can be done. I will take this one and let SVX have the next full blown supercar.

Not a problem. Just throwing an idea out there for when you have time to do it, and whether or not you actually want to do it.

And also if at any time you're looking for test drivers, I may be able to help. :sly:👍
 
:lol: I'd be up to do that. 👍 Just not now as we've just finished two comparisons.

First we need something a little more focused to the cheap man. The we'll go for Mclaren... Ness. But since SVX is out there right now with a cheap car that leaves me to the Mclaren. I do apologize SVX for you having the slower cheaper car and then me get another dose of speed.

I don't mind. You can go ahead and do it, but I've got an idea... đź’ˇ
 
Soo .. when will you get back to help buyers ? :D
 
Apparently I have been asked to be The Stig for the munchkins SVX & Skython. They were begging more than Rob Schneider in a desperate search to star in a funny movie. I will return will several paragraphs describing my experience with the cars they made me drive.
 
You're fired Crooooooow. Because like any Stig their identity must remain unknown. Sorry, mate. You're a Stig for a reason. Which is to have fair times around the track. We had multiple Stigs run in times. As a trial, the quickest it our new Stig. You've just counted yourself out.

Also, welcome Korza493 as a third presenter and reviewer of the operation. :cheers:
 
I feel like an idiot now. :lol: All I know about the Stig is that he/it is a racer for Top Gear. If I watched more Top Gear, I wouldn't have made that stupid comment. Well anyway, I wouldn't have been a good racer and critic anyway. Pardon my pure intelligence. :lol: You're wondering why you asked me to help out in the first place.
 
You're fired Crooooooow. Because like any Stig their identity must remain unknown. Sorry, mate. You're a Stig for a reason. Which is to have fair times around the track. We had multiple Stigs run in times. As a trial, the quickest it our new Stig. You've just counted yourself out.

Also, welcome Korza493 as a third presenter and reviewer of the operation. :cheers:

Thank you for the warm welcome. :D I'll post my first review in the next week or so...

I feel like an idiot now. :lol: All I know about the Stig is that he/it is a racer for Top Gear. If I watched more Top Gear, I wouldn't have made that stupid comment. Well anyway, I wouldn't have been a good racer and critic anyway. Pardon my pure intelligence. :lol: You're wondering why you asked me to help out in the first place.

Maybe you should become the 4th reviewer, striving to try and beat me (you'd still fail though :sly:)... :D
 
It took awhile, but we got there.

Mitsubishi GTO SR ‘96



Welcome to another episode of GT5 Driver's Insight. In this review, I will be testing the 1996 Mitsubishi GTO SR requested by werty_56-1. Looking over the specifications, I am not expecting a brilliant drive. This car sports the Naturally Aspirated 3.0 V6 coupled with Mitsubishi’s trusted 4WD system. This car having the non turbo 3.0 V6 rather than the twin turbo 3.0 V6 which is found in the VR-4 leads me to believe that this is a watered down trim level, more of a ‘base model’. Here are the specifications:

Brake horsepower: 206 bhp @ 6000 rpm (no oil change).

Torque: 255 nm @ 4500 (no oil change).

Performance Points: 390 pp.

Weight: 1610 kg.

Engine: NA 3.0 V6.

Drivetrain: Front engined 4WD, with a five speed transmission.

Price: 29,980 cr. (at 0kms).

102 kg more heavier than the Corvette I just tested, with an engine half the size and 300 bhp less?! Somethings not right here. It shows, as well:

0 – 400m: 16.149

0 – 1000m: 29.175

0 – 100km/h: 8.263

0 – 200km/h: N/A

Max Speed: 243.3km/h

Max g force: 0.67

Acceleration feels bogged down, it feels like it’s got less power than it really has. Max speed is alright, considering how much weight and power it has.

Looking at these results while I was on my way to Tokyo R246, where I will be testing the Mitsubishi’s handling, I am not expecting a record breaking time.



As I arrive I quickly get into the Mitsubishi. The Mitsubishi’s interior view is great, especially the rearview. You see everything like your driving a motorized window. Turning into the last corner heading onto the main straight, I get a… normal result. As mentioned before acceleration is not fantastic, so I don’t make a fast corner exit. I start applying the breaks to slow down for the first corner. Breaks are great! They definitely don’t show the amount of weight this car has. Turning in, I get the expected understeer. Not as much as I was expecting though. One thing that I’m not enjoying is this car’s wide gearbox. 3rd is soooooo long and just saps out most of the power and just doesn’t work. After a few laps, I get used to the understeer and figure out how to deal with it. To get good corner entries, you must turn in early. You normally clip the apex and go back to the outside. A thing I found tricky was dealing with the understeer on Tokyo’s long corners. I’d go in early, but I’d slide to the outside mid corner which isn’t a good thing to happen in a long corner. I’d deal with it by letting of the throttle for a bit. I found this was a good way to deal with it. I was driving for a little while and I realized. This car would be perfect for an average player starting out with its easy to drive nature and it’s not too high powered engine. Sadly with its nearly 30,000 cr. pricetag, it isn't cheap for a beginner, although you could always save up for it.




The final result:

Comfort: The Mitsubishi has a very nice soft suspension which is great for around town, but not so much for track duties. Thanks to this soft suspension it produces a fair bit of bodyroll. I give it a 75/100.

Speed: Fairly underpowered considering the weight it has to carry around. Once you get up to speed it is a really nice car to drive. 65/100.

Value: Fairly overpriced for what you get. You can easily get faster cars (Imprezas, Lancers) for that price. Would be more suited to about 18,000 cr. It would make a perfect car for beginners. 58/100.

Looks: In my opinion, the GTO SR is one of the nicest looking cars for its price range. It gives a nice nineties technical vibe with its low slung body and wide rear spoiler. 65/100.

Fun Factor: This thing is very fun once you get up to speed. You may intend on doing a nice cruise but you will shortly find yourself trying to grab that last tenth of a second. 70/100.

All in all, the Mitsubishi GTO SR is a pretty good car with its great handling, but its sadly overshadowed by its heavy weight and not so stellar performance.

Would I get one if I had the money?

Possibly. It would make a good project car as it starts without the horrible understeer the VR-4 has.



Thanks a lot for reading! :cheers:

​


Info is from Gran Turismo 5 and mygranturismo.net.​
 
Last edited:
Come on GTPers, comment! Good review, Josh. 👍 Though you sort of gave away the verdict at the start, in which it's enjoyable.
 
Come on GTPers, comment! Good review, Josh. 👍 Though you sort of gave away the verdict at the start, in which it's enjoyable.

Thanks for the kind words Skython. :cheers: What do you mean "Though you sort of gave away the verdict at the start"?

Just a heads up, you spelt 'Mitsubishi' wrong.
 
I just misread it and thouoght it said you didn't expect a brilliant drive. But you said you're not expecting one, which while being almost identical has a different meaning.

And no, I didn't spell Mitsubishi wrong, it was a typo. Spelling it wrong means you thought you were right, what I did was simply a typo. ;)
 
I just misread it and thouoght it said you didn't expect a brilliant drive. But you said you're not expecting one, which while being almost identical has a different meaning.

And no, I didn't spell Mitsubishi wrong, it was a typo. Spelling it wrong means you thought you were right, what I did was simply a typo. ;)

Ah, okay.
 
SVX, you spelt cruise wrong. But other than that, great review. I'm going to get one up soon.
 
SVX, you spelt cruise wrong. But other than that, great review. I'm going to get one up soon.

I knew there was an 'i' in cruise! Thanks for the kind words, I look forward to your review.
 
SVX, you spelt cruise wrong. But other than that, great review. I'm going to get one up soon.

Nice review SVX, though you didn't mention how the GTO can, when needs be, be taken up to 600hp+. Just saying that would make the sales for GTO SRs sky rocket. :D

Also, I thought you did it intentionally! Like Crooze, or Cruze. :p Gangsta talk ftw.

And Korza, I, too, look forward to your review ofÂ…whatever, mainly because that means the GP's reviewing side is complete! You're finally joining the club. :D
 
Great write up on the 3KGT SL. Very informative on the details on the car, espically for a SL model. :)

Come to thinking about it, I'm gonna get one of these later for some tests soon. 👍
 
Nice review SVX, though you didn't mention how the GTO can, when needs be, be taken up to 600hp+. Just saying that would make the sales for GTO SRs sky rocket. :D

Also, I thought you did it intentionally! Like Crooze, or Cruze. :p Gangsta talk ftw.

And Korza, I, too, look forward to your review ofÂ…whatever, mainly because that means the GP's reviewing side is complete! You're finally joining the club. :D

:lol:

Thanks Onboy. :cheers:

Great write up on the 3KGT SL. Very informative on the details on the car, espically for a SL model. :)

Come to thinking about it, I'm gonna get one of these later for some tests soon. 👍

Glad to of helped you Vspec. Thanks for the nice comments. :cheers:
 
Awesome review :eek:

I was impressed with this car (when I drove it) , but now with your review I will buy .... another one :drool::dopey:

Thanks and good work , Keep 'em comming !!! :dopey:
 
I like the quick, To-The-Point Reviews, a suggestion would be to rebuild the motor before a review (Only if a used car)..

You should do a Neon SRT-4 Review
 
Awesome review :eek:

I was impressed with this car (when I drove it) , but now with your review I will buy .... another one :drool::dopey:

Thanks and good work , Keep 'em comming !!! :dopey:

Thanks man, glad to of 'helped' you. ;) :cheers:

I like the quick, To-The-Point Reviews, a suggestion would be to rebuild the motor before a review (Only if a used car)..

You should do a Neon SRT-4 Review

Thanks for the kind words Mitch. :cheers: Yeah, I know, but the reason the car hadn't had a engine rebuild and stuff was because I got asked to review it by werty_56-1, and he already had one, so he said he'll just put it on share. Which sadly meant I had to run what I brung.

I'll have a look at it, I'm pretty sure I have one, but I've got heaps of cars I want to review first.
 
Back