GTP Cool Wall: 1951-1954 Hudson Hornet

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jahgee
  • 50 comments
  • 6,349 views

1951-1954 Hudson Hornet

  • Total voters
    140
  • Poll closed .
Jahgee

Jahgee

(Banned)
Messages
16,280
United States
New York
Messages
Jahgee1124
1951-1954 Hudson Hornet nominated by @Dennisch
AR-60518004.jpg


Engines: 5.0L I6, 5.0L I6 7-X
Power: 5.0L I6: 145-172 hp; 5.0L I6 7-X: 210 hp
Torque: 275 ft-lb
Weight: 1642 kg
Transmission: 3-speed manual, 3-speed manual with overdrive, 4-speed automatic
Drivetrain: Front engine, rear wheel drive
Body Styles: 2-door coupe, 2-door sedan, 4-door sedan, 2-door hardtop, 2-door convertible​
 
Very classy, nice styling, and I'd get to explain to non classic car enthusiasts what it was.

Sub Zero.
 
From a time when American cars were probably the coolest.
 
Awesome car, very classy. It's becoming especially obscure these days. Cool.
 
When I have the money ( I actually already had it but I bought the pickup) this will be at the very top of my list. Doesn't matter how rusted or how seized the engine is. This is my dream car. Nascar racing in 50's style. Big fat flathead l6.
Just look at it.

Sub Zero.
 
Legendary. Even Disney couldn't ruin it. Sub-Zero.
 
A cool, classy car. Not quite Sub-Zero though.
 
Awesome car with great history.

S-Z.
 
1953_Hudson_Hornet_Convertible_For_Sale_resize.jpg


This is the car I actually called the US for. At the time the price was 25k and I needed him to drop to 15k but he didn't went under 20k. He sold it and now it appears to be sold again, this time in Florida.
 
Meh. Bit too generic for the era.
 
Streamline Moderne has to be one of the cooler design languages, and this is a great example. Even the non-stock car variants were "Fabulous".

Solid Cool.
 
Not for me, sorry guys, but uncool.

I don't think its pretty, I have virtually no interest in NASCAR, actually none what so ever. Not seeing anything appealing about this car at all.

I won't vote seriously uncool because it isn't confronting in anyway, its just very boring to me, too boring simply for a meh.
 
Sub'd. Exemplifies a simpler, more optimistic time in the US, and it shows in the styling. No excuses, just a self-assured look. Also, kickass name.
 
Sub-zero, it's from the era just before America car design went down hill for the next 50 years.
 
Subzero for me. Always loved these.
 
Class at its finest. Sub zero.
 
Classy styling and performance pedigree. Sub Zero.
 
Sub-Zero because Cars.
 
Not my cup of tea, but it's impossible to hate it. Cool.
 
It's nice but it wouldn't go into the Sub Zero category because it doesn't appeal enough to me, solid cool.
 
Beautiful lines.

Cool.
 
Strong cool. I really like this era of american cars. This and the Mercury are such classy looking cars.
 
Meh. Not an automotive era that interests me.
 
I just don't get a 'fizz' from cars like this, but I can understand how many people can love them. So it's a meh from me.
 
Back