GTP Cool Wall: 1953-1956 Austin-Healey 100

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jahgee
  • 32 comments
  • 5,441 views

1953-1956 Austin-Healey 100


  • Total voters
    109
  • Poll closed .

Jahgee

(Banned)
Messages
16,280
United States
New York
Messages
Jahgee1124
1953-1956 Austin-Healey 100 nominated by @FilipinoGTUser1
Austin_Healey_100_1955.jpg


Engines:
2.7L I4
Power: BN1/BN2: 90 hp; BN2 100M: 110 hp
Torque: BN1/BN2: 144 lb-ft. BN2 100M: 150 lb-ft.
Weight: BN1/BN2: 915 kg; BN2 100M: 985 kg
Transmission: 3-speed manual, 4-speed manual
Drivetrain: Front engine, rear wheel drive
Body Styles: 2-door convertible​
BN1:
1_2_71_1715Austin20Healey2010020S20BN1-19.jpg

IanOsborne-BA.JPG

rear_3_4_pass.jpg


BN2:
112823_Front_3-4_Web.jpg

1956_Austin_Healey_100_BN2_Roadster_For_Sale_Black_Rear_resize.jpg


100M:
modelpicture.php

austin-healey-100s-photo-370389-s-1280x782.jpg

112723_Interior_Web.JPG
 
Conjouring images of dirty fingernails in mind, it's still a cool little car none the less.
 
A definite, solid Cool. It even looks good in two-tone paint jobs.
 
Nice, cool, classic roadster, but something pushes me away from voting sub zero. Cool
 
The least-cool of the 'big' Healeys. Overshadowed by the later 6 cylinder cars.

Still very cool.
 
I can only think of classy mustached old people wearing berets with their thick coats, long scarves, smoking a pipe and being snobbishly posh.

That, on all cases, is awesome.
 
It's the Big Healey!


Oh wait. It's not the Big Healey.
 
I'd usually give most cars from the era a sub-zero, but the grille is absolutely hideous. It's also a bit underpowered for a sports car (even this age), which bumps it down to an meh.

Plz don't kill me!
 
Last edited:
It's also underpowered for a sports car (even this age, look at 300SL for example)
Weight. Also the 300SL was the fastest road car you could buy in the day, but it was one of the most expensive cars too.
 
Weight. Also the 300SL was the fastest road car you could buy in the day, but it was one of the most expensive cars too.
I knew that was coming. Ok, I'll change it to a meh if that's so.
 
Either cool, because classic roadster, or uncool because...

I can only think of classy mustached old people wearing berets with their thick coats, long scarves, smoking a pipe and being snobbishly posh.

Decisions, decisions...
 
Classy car. For me classy things are very cool.
 
Can't find a reason to vote uncool, so meh it is.

Prefer the later Healey's.
 
Meh. 6-cylinder versions are much cooler.
 
I can only think of classy mustached old people wearing berets with their thick coats, long scarves, smoking a pipe and being snobbishly posh.

Like these guys, right?
500px-Chimps_ahoy.jpg
 
Not a frog-eye. So not subzero. But still pretty cool.
 
Not the greatest car ever, but I'd be more than happy to drive it. Cool
 
Not as cool as the 3000 but still cool.
 
Not a 3000, but still cool :)
 
Defines cool, because not a 3000, which is instant SZ. Definitely a pattern forming with these votes and comments :)
 
Back