- 34,949

- Indian Falls, NY
- slashfan7964
You got proven otherwise before you even commented that it has "underwhelming power figures, probably crappy handling, ugly configuration".
That still doesn't change my opinion.
You got proven otherwise before you even commented that it has "underwhelming power figures, probably crappy handling, ugly configuration".
Your opinion was based on it being boring because of "underwhelming power figures, probably crappy handling, ugly configuration". If you want to continue to stick that opinion, go ahead. We call that ignorance everywhere else.That still doesn't change my opinion.
And that's before we even get onto you lumping the XR2 as a commuter car in the same vein as an executive saloon.
It could do mid 9s 0-60mph runs at a time when the V8 Ferrari was doing mid 7s. For a £5k car, compared to the £50k Ferrari.
The modern equivalent would be spending £17k on a Fiesta that can do 0-60mph in 4.1s (the V8 Ferrari costs £170k and does it in 3.3s).
I'd say it was pretty brisk for its time.
Seriously uncool. A Renault badge could so easily have earned this a cool, but. It's an 80s Ford.
Okay, let's pretend that a 1981 XR2 did 10.2s to 60mph and the 1981 Ferrari 308 did 6.5s. The modern equivalent would be a £17k Fiesta that does 0-60mph in 5.1s.I never saw anything saying mid 9s.
I saw mid 11s and that a kit from an aftermarket company could put a turbo on it but nothing about 9s 0-60. I'll have to look up some more research.
Edit: Found autocar saying 10.2.
Found "performance car guide" claiming mid 9s but that site isn't exactly on par with the other sources I'm seeing (of course that's just my opinion of the site).
Btw, I'm also consistently seeing the Ferrari 308 doing mid 6s for 60.
Okay, let's pretend that a 1981 XR2 did 10.2s to 60mph and the 1981 Ferrari 308 did 6.5s. The modern equivalent would be a £17k Fiesta that does 0-60mph in 5.1s.
I'd say that's pretty brisk for its time.
Simply because I'm not really interested in arguing the toss about acceleration figures from thirty years ago that were probably made up anyway (because 80s) as it doesn't really help the point.I'll give you credit that it wasn't the slowest car around but I don't quite understand the whole "let's pretend" thing about the times.
Basically we agree it was cheap and a hatchback. Just how fast it was and if that was noticeable is another issue. Either way I've said all I need to say, we simply dont agree on everything, no big deal.Simply because I'm not really interested in arguing the toss about acceleration figures from thirty years ago that were probably made up anyway (because 80s) as it doesn't really help the point.
It was a hot hatch. It was a hatchback you could go and buy for buttons that didn't get to the speed limit noticeably slower than the V8 Ferrari benchmark of the time - that largely defines what a hot hatch is.
He'd have a hard job - the XR2i wasn't out until 8 years and two generations of Fiesta later.If Scumbag Steve was alive a decade or 3 earlier, he would drive an XR2i, and he would be pulling handbrake turns in outside your grannies house.
If Scumbag Steve was alive a decade or 3 earlier, he would drive an XR2i, and he would be pulling handbrake turns in outside your grannies house.
You're assuming the hell out of it.Boring to look at, underwhelming power figures, probably crappy handling, ugly configuration, typically rust buckets, eh just nothing cool about this car for me. Just look at it. Nothing cool. Plus its a rip off car. Nothing is more uncool than that. Seriously uncool.
How so? Yes, he's judging the hell out of it and isYou are entitled to your justification of your vote but your reasoning shows a serious ignorance of European cars, the history of European cars and European car culture.
YI'd wager anyone here you're like Cody in that you didn't even know this existed til' an hour ago.
If I don't like something odds are I'm not going to find it cool.Cool has nothing to do with being good.
This is not a like wall.
It's a Ford people. A Ford. Ford.
None the less, I've never heard anything bad about these things, but the joyriding connotations aren't quite gone yet
True, but it doesn't always make it uncool.If I don't like something odds are I'm not going to find it cool.
No one ever said it did.True, but it doesn't always make it uncool.
Cool has nothing to do with being good.
This is not a like wall.
If I don't like something odds are I'm not going to find it cool.
Errm. Yes it does.
It does have something to do with coolness.No, it doesn't. Cool is an aesthetic. There are many terrible things which can still be described as cool, just as there are many excellent things which are in no way cool at all.
A Renault badge could so easily have earned this a cool, but. It's an 80s Ford.
So you prefer standing next to the road with the hood open than having a blast driving around?
Now is the time to grab a kittenface Zetec S...He'd have a hard job - the XR2i wasn't out until 8 years and two generations of Fiesta later.
I'd have an XR2i tomorrow. Not an RS Turbo or RS1800 (okay, maybe an RS1800), the basic XR2i. Wish I'd bought one four years ago when I was thinking about it, because prices have rocketed.
And that is why you're such a hideously bad judge of coolness. An inability to separate something you like from something that's cool.If I don't like something odds are I'm not going to find it cool.