- 831
- ANFD
Who'd have guessed that Vince Fiero would actually have a Fiero? I wonder what car Murcie_LP640 drives....?
I have a friend in NC and his email address is "fieroman @xxx.com (or something like that)
He owns 6 Fieros
Last edited:
Who'd have guessed that Vince Fiero would actually have a Fiero? I wonder what car Murcie_LP640 drives....?
Chevy Caprice
Ford Crown Vic
Lincoln Towncar
Buick Roadmaster.
Come on son. Lets not hide our heads in the sand.
Chevy Caprice/Buick Roadmaster/Impala SS - Same car
Ford Crown Vic/Lincoln Town Car/Mercury Grand Marquis - same car
Basically, two cars. Rather, two platforms, if you wanna call it that. I don't call that almost all of them, like you seem to think.
Again, my beef isn't that America has made bad cars or decisions: they have. But I think the GTO is a very poor example compared to what came later. People wanted to go fast, cheap. The GTO went fast, fairly inexpensively.
Stop. I said quite a few. I DID NOT in anyway hint or insunuate that it was almost all of them. I said quite a few of them were still made that way in the 90s. Exact words. If we go back to the 80s we can probably find more examples. 70s, even more.
At some point, maybe your buddy, maybe someone else, someone is going to buy that car thinking its a hot performance car, and get a rude awakening when they go into that corner too hot or try to brake at the last minute and the car doesn't stop. In their mind, they might ask themselves "what kind of performance car is this that can't turn or brake?" And that my friend, is how reputations start.
I'm not knocking GM. I'm knocking their execution, which begot the reputation they now have.
I guess it boils down to me thinking that if you are gonna call a car a performance car, it better be something that backs it up. All mouth no trousers won't cut it. And that is where GM has fallen short. All mouth going in a straight line simply means no trousers everywhere, because straight line performance is ONE metric of a performance car. Essentially, they dug their own grave by doing what they did.
AHA! HERE'S THE ANSWER!
You think you can rightfully compare a Subcompact to a Midsize, AND throw out ALL technical advances. Let's see...It's 1964. Radial tires haven't been widely accepted yet...Formula 1 even uses crossplies. Tires are all narrow and skinny. Disc brakes are expensive. Given all of this, the big-engined GTO could actually go around corners quite well for a car of its' age. The suspension was stronger and tuned to help rotate the car better. It had larger wheels and wider tires, sometimes alloy wheels. Of course, it was an intermediate. You didn't expect it to handle like an all-out sports car. It was too heavy...too physically large. But you could still drive on the highway with a modicum of comfort, too. If you bought the BMW, you gave up a lot of that.
Let me see if I understood correctly. 2471cc, 92HP?
Uncool.
, it might convince some people on the qualities of this car.2.7L engine produced 232 horses