Scaff
Moderator
- 29,909
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
Or that others may still be under investigation and releasing details may be counterproductive to stopping them.While it is never a good idea to give people like that press, I understand why, don't we still have a right to know? Sometimes I feel like things are hidden or swept under the rug as to not increase hatred.
Probably there are things more important than the public's "right to know". It could be a short list.While it is never a good idea to give people like that press, I understand why, don't we still have a right to know? Sometimes I feel like things are hidden or swept under the rug as to not increase hatred.
Yes, as I said its still early days yet and its far more important to know that they have got everyone involved that for us to know.Do you guys think the truth will eventually come out?
Yes, as I said its still early days yet and its far more important to know that they have got everyone involved that for us to know.
Why?I hope that you are right but I have my doubts.
There may be many reasons to cover the facts with lies and spin. Motives are always the hardest thing to understand. Never ask why. Ask who, what, where, when and how. But never why.Why?
Why?
Funny. If you had said, "I think we can assume the perps aren't white people etc.", I'm guessing the retorts would have been quite swiftI think we can assume the perps aren't other Muslims if they're the same people who left the pig's headon their doorstep last June.
The Quebec authorities have not identified the suspects, but Radio Canada quoted a source close to the investigation as saying that they were students at Laval University in Quebec City and one was of Moroccan origin. An eyewitness told the radio station that two hooded people had burst into the mosque. One opened fire on those praying and shouted "Allahu Akbar", Arabic for "God is Great".
Hilarious, I'm sure. I think it'd depend upon what kind of evidence or reasoning the statement were based on after the "etc."Funny. If you had said, "I think we can assume the perps aren't white people etc.", I'm guessing the retorts would have been quite swift![]()
Hilarious, I'm sure. I think it'd depend upon what kind of evidence or reasoning the statement were based on after the "etc."
The problem is we are not being told.
If the attackers were Muslim then I fail to see how that would be a fact to hide? After all it would demonstrate that those who are radical are not representative of the larger community, after all if they were then they would have no reason to attack them.Because I feel that some things are not shared, I think you know why but I'll say it for you. If this turns out to be Muslim of any sort, we should not know because we are not supposed to hate them, if it is some sort of Christian deal the same applies.
I think we deserve to know the truth regardless where the chips may fall but many times that is not the case and I consider the Canadian Government, especially in Quebec to be dishonest. Canada is a really neat place because of how their governments work, I have much experience there and I get on well with the west coast.
Not sure that last part matters but hey, I can say it.
Alexandre the cow?Alexandre Bissonnette and Mohamed El Khadir.
SEE IT WAS A MUSLIM!!! Alexandre? Wait.
So ISIS and an anti-Muslim working together? /sAlexandre Bissonnette and Mohamed El Khadir.
SEE IT WAS A MUSLIM!!! Alexandre? Wait.
If the community gathered at the mosque were apostate or heretic, that may be reason enough. For instance, Sunni consider Shia to be apostate and heretic, and there is war between them in Syria and Iraq. Saudi Arabia is at war with Iran for the same reason. Catholics have slaughtered Protestants, Cathars, etc in bygone times. Scratch a believer and you potentially find a fanatic, no?If the attackers were Muslim then I fail to see how that would be a fact to hide? After all it would demonstrate that those who are radical are not representative of the larger community, after all if they were then they would have no reason to attack them.
Potentially being the word in question.If the community gathered at the mosque were apostate or heretic, that may be reason enough. For instance, Sunni consider Shia to be apostate and heretic, and there is war between them in Syria and Iraq. Saudi Arabia is at war with Iran for the same reason. Catholics have slaughtered Protestants, Cathars, etc in bygone times. Scratch a believer and you potentially find a fanatic, no?
So ISIS and an anti-Muslim working together? /s
ISIS is Anti-Muslim.
I don't know what to call the other dude.ISIS is Anti-Muslim.
I don't know what to call the other dude.