Hazardous Waste Sites and Environmental Agencies

  • Thread starter Thread starter Keef
  • 6 comments
  • 2,045 views

Keef

Premium
Messages
25,325
United States
Dayton, OH
Messages
GTP_KeefRacer
Messages
GTP Keef
An issue I've been particularly interested in for some time now is that of hazardous waste cleanup efforts in my local area. I grew up in Dayton, Ohio, a historically industrial city in the "rust belt" of the United States with strong ties to the Big Three auto manufacturers, metal manufacturing and chemical industries. My dad grew up in Old North Dayton, an area just north of Downtown that is on the rough side these days, never was particularly nice and is still slowly declining. Something about it just doesn't feel clean to my suburban skin. Plus, the stories my dad always told me about how dirty the air and water used to be, plus the fact that he used to play in the trash dump right near his house...

I did a little research on the dump. It was called Valleycrest Landfill. My dad had his fun there in the late 50s and early 60s, but by the mid 70s it looked like this:

vfTlMYJ.jpg

8sIBmA2.jpg

e8U0ZKO.jpg

8q3QsTX.jpg
s18Bwzi.jpg


And that, my friends, put me on the floor.

What I learned from this was that the EPA, our Environmental Protection Agency, was formed in 1970 mainly as a result of massive public outcry around the country, especially in the industrial areas of the midwest and east coast. Millions of people were protesting because they were tired of this happening:

Downtown_Cleveland,_Ohio,_in_winter,_from_the_air,_12-1937_-_NARA_-_512842.jpg


Cuyahoga-River-goop.jpg


cleveland_Cuyahoga_river_fire_1952.jpg


They're all images of the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, OH, on the shores of Lake Erie. At the top you can see the positively barren industrial landscape surrounding the river and at the bottom you can see the river on fire in the 50s. A river. On fire. That wasn't the first, nor was it the last time that sludge pit of a river caught on fire.

The EPA eventually set up this thing called Superfund which is a program by which various agencies have authority to identify, investigate, clean up and even prosecute parties involved with hazardous waste dump sites around the country. Of the numerous sites I've read about, it seems like most of them came about during the 50s, 60s and 70s, especially the 60s. it must've been an extremely careless time period as far as industry and the environment goes. The EPA discovered what seems to be the majority during the 80s but I've found sites in my area discovered as recently as 2012, typically hidden back in the woods or boonies where nobody ventures very often.

And as it turns out, the Valleycrest Landfill (and the petroleum tank farm directly to the west of its barren field as seen in the Google map of Old North Dayton) ended up being one of them. The EPA identified hundreds of sites around the country very quickly after the Superfund program was enacted and Valleycrest was one, though to my knowledge not one of the more famous or controversial sites. I've made a habit of scouring Google Maps looking for the telltale signs of old landfills and cleanup sites such as manicured barren land, fence lines and monitoring wells dotted all around the field, then researching the story on the location. Look up the story of Love Canal and follow up on the sources if you want to read something sketchy. A couple of my favorites are ones I discovered while dating a girl who grew up in St. Louis. The first involves a town that got completely shut down by dioxin contamination and the other, ongoing site is about a neighborhood in northern St. Louis where you've got a 50% chance of dying from brain cancer. Gotta love that Manhattan Project.

Anyways, I've learned quite a bit about the operations in the US, including a pretty gnarly (short video) coverup (hour long special investigation) I learned about earlier today, but I'm curious about similar operations in other countries. What does the UK or Australia have that's equal to the EPA's Superfund project? Are local toxic waste sites a similarly worrisome environmental problem? Are they maybe even more common than in the US? I personally live in a clean area of Dayton but there are several Superfund and National Priority List sites within just a few miles of my house.

If any of you guys are interested in or know of similar local environmental problems like this, share the info and discuss the issue. This is a problem that really does ruin lives without people ever knowing.

Also, just for fun, here's a map of EPA sites around the US.
 
Last edited:
As far as I am aware, the UK is pretty good against environmental dumping. As a small island compared to the width of an entire continent, we are by far a smaller place, making these things a bit harder to hide. I could be entirely wrong of course and I'd welcome any other Britons to inform me.

Our government body is a mix of the EPA and FDA: DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) is responsible for such activities in association with the devolved Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish bodies.

The main issue which springs to mind in the UK is the Sellafield nuclear waste reprocessing plant. Always a delicate subject, there have been a few leaks over the years. Now and then you do read the odd story about a river whose water quality has fallen due to industrial waste, but nothing super deadly serious.
 
There have been a few illegal dumpers in australia.

These are idiots that just dump their truck load of hazardous waste on back alley streets.

They mainly dump asbestos
 
Why in back alley streets? Australia is huge. There's a lot of complete nothingness to dump stuff.

But in seriousness is Australia's abundance of space, barren or not, a help or hindrance with regards to waste disposal and environmental hazards? There's plenty of room to build infrastructure outside of and away from the metropolitan areas, but it could well be just as easy to drive out to the sticks and dump stuff.
 
The Australian Government has already been moving to try to make money by dumping radioactive waste in Aboriginal Lands.

And Bob Hawke, an ex-Prime Minister (from the left wing Labor Party) supports this proposal ostensibly so the Aborigines can get more money. Yeah. Likely.

Who needs a Right wing when the Left is like this!

I have driven through some of that beautiful "complete nothingness", and the thought of using it as a waste dump is appalling, and to dump stuff that is toxic for thousands or tens of thousands of years is mind-blowingly stupid.

Any community stupid enough to use nuclear fuel for energy with no plan for effective disposing of the waste just has to look after the waste themselves. Sadly, that includes my state.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ste-storage-could-end-indigenous-disadvantage
 
Yeah, you can't just "dump" stuff like that. It finds its way back to you. There are "proper" ways of disposing of it but it's still a long term endeavor, basically forever, that effectively wastes land and requires constant maintenance. Luckily, Australia does have a lot of nothing to store such waste but to do properly contain it requires a big operation no matter where you put it.

Literally dumping radioactive material results in the cancer cluster which has formed in northern St. Louis that I posted in the OP.
 
Back