Here. A new batch of GT4 screens.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tercel_driver
  • 19 comments
  • 919 views
thanx, but someone already made a thread yesterday about the same pics:), there is also some new vids
 
have u seen the pic with driver in the prowler,u know this kicks PGR2's backside.
 
I think this pictures are all from the demo vers. that we already see on E3.
(I think the final game will be a little bit different)
 
You bet it'll be different, they didn't even use the new graphics engine for the E3 demo, so what you've seen was GTC with some new cars!
 
heeeeeeeeey!!!!! this stuff is SWEET!!! the prowler looks cool. also the Plymouth GTX, and the 350Z LM car. thanks for this!

Cano

I
CANT
WAIT
:drool:
 
Hmm - interesting. Good to see an animated driver in the Prowler, too.

This might be GT3's GT2 - if you catch my drift.
 
Originally posted by Cano
heeeeeeeeey!!!!! this stuff is SWEET!!! the prowler looks cool. also the Plymouth GTX, and the 350Z LM car. thanks for this!

Cano

I
CANT
WAIT
:drool:

can you post a pic of the GTX i cant find any???
 
gtx's dont really look like gto's or cuda's, kinda hard unless you dont know many muscle cars
 
1971 GTX
71gtx3.jpg


1969 GTX
-69gtx.jpg
 
lol, they have a billboard of Witchblade :p

The 350Z LM Car looks like it was resurrected from GT2 with a new scheme. Other than that, the pictures are good :drool:
 
Wow.:eek: This game is turning out to be everything I expected. The screens are amazing! Can you imagine what will happen when GT4 launches?! Pandemonium for a week! (or more!)
 
I hope they fix the 250 lb-ft/ 500( - where it should be 250 lb-ft/ 5000 rpm :rolleyes: I hope this isn't another bug that never gets fixed like the torque readings in GT3...
 
Actually, they should display the atorque of the car as Nm/rpm

Newton meters/ revs per minute


that stuff about 250 LB-FT/ 5000 : LB-FT isn't clearing up anything for me.

Give me european standards.
 
Yeah well we don't use those units of measure here in North America, and the screens were for the NTSC version anyway, I'm sure the PAL version will have the correct units of measure that you use. All I'm saying is that it's a typo in the rpm that the torque is achieved at, intstead of 5000, it's 500(
 
Back