'Hot chicks' rant
- Thread starter Duke
- 76 comments
- 4,131 views
mayorbill11
(Banned)
- 1,231
Originally posted by Concept
Heh, pretty funny man.
Anyway, we are all getting off topic. Lets get back on it.
that was a lame line.
can't you see that 'hot chicks suck' is a play on words? you're all tools.
- 24,883
- Somewhere.
he'd like to, but his other "home" is down at the moment.
it's not just a GT forum in general, it's a PG13 forum. we can discuss a lot of things, but they have to make sense, and be within the acceptable policy of the place's owner (in this case Jordan) most vb/bb/ubb i've been to are that strict too.
mayorbill11
(Banned)
- 1,231
- 2,492
yes, and neither is really necessary for a site like this. As I said before, GTP is a site for gaming not for displaying pictures of women with few articles of clothing. A picture of a chick in a bikini may not be quite considered porn but it is fairly close to it.
I dont know what your problem is, but an attitude like that won't get you far in life. Thats rather childish. it was a small joke , thats all.
- 12,993
- USA! USA!
That's what she said.
GilesGuthrie
Staff Emeritus
- 11,038
- Edinburgh, UK
- CMDRTheDarkLord
Well written as always Neon_Duke...
The real problem with it is that there are so many fine creatures in the real world that talking about celebrities becomes dull beyond belief. I have my own favourites of those people in public life as I'm sure everyone does. The thing is that my favourites are not necessarily the same as your favourites, and unless you want to have an educated, reasoned discussion about the socio-economic demographics involved regarding why I like someone and you like someone else, then it just becomes a war over who's got the best fantasy world.
And one thing that a lot of people have failed to realise is that a lot of women in this world (I assume this applies to men also), are so much more attractive in real life than in photographs, that it makes the medium of photography almost laughable. They say the camera never lies, well it never tells the whole truth, either.
Interaction is about so much more than drooling over a picture and then posting mindless slavering nonsense about how "this chick's so hot she ownzzz". ZZZ indeed, or should that be :sleep:
I don't know why people do it anyway, because all that ever happens is some other user comes in and says "Ugh, she's a pig, you suck".
The real problem with it is that there are so many fine creatures in the real world that talking about celebrities becomes dull beyond belief. I have my own favourites of those people in public life as I'm sure everyone does. The thing is that my favourites are not necessarily the same as your favourites, and unless you want to have an educated, reasoned discussion about the socio-economic demographics involved regarding why I like someone and you like someone else, then it just becomes a war over who's got the best fantasy world.
And one thing that a lot of people have failed to realise is that a lot of women in this world (I assume this applies to men also), are so much more attractive in real life than in photographs, that it makes the medium of photography almost laughable. They say the camera never lies, well it never tells the whole truth, either.
Interaction is about so much more than drooling over a picture and then posting mindless slavering nonsense about how "this chick's so hot she ownzzz". ZZZ indeed, or should that be :sleep:
I don't know why people do it anyway, because all that ever happens is some other user comes in and says "Ugh, she's a pig, you suck".
- 1,731
- GTP_pedrodaman
I never looked at the link in question that started this thread..
Maybe the person that posted the link is infact an admin of this so called site trying to get a hold of subscribers to send spam to..or should i say gullible ones to send spam to
Just like the ones you see spamming yahoo chatrooms ,messenger's etc
In my own experence i clicked on a PM in a chat room quite some time ago thinking it was from someone on my friends list ..And after that i was spammed for months through email ,messenger any means available to them
And the fact being when i checked the thread it was the person's 3rd post on these boards that's enough to arouse suspision so maybe im right just a thought
well said giles ..The real deal is way better than all that crap
Maybe the person that posted the link is infact an admin of this so called site trying to get a hold of subscribers to send spam to..or should i say gullible ones to send spam to
Just like the ones you see spamming yahoo chatrooms ,messenger's etc
In my own experence i clicked on a PM in a chat room quite some time ago thinking it was from someone on my friends list ..And after that i was spammed for months through email ,messenger any means available to them
And the fact being when i checked the thread it was the person's 3rd post on these boards that's enough to arouse suspision so maybe im right just a thought
well said giles ..The real deal is way better than all that crap
- 349
I'm not disagreeing with you. I, like you, like fumbling around with funbags instead of looking at pictures on the net. However, I wouldn't say it was "obsessing" to give a RVDnut style comment. After all there is no harm in it. Yes, if yuo didn't venture out of your 4 walls, and formed a relationship with a jpeg, I'd worry too. However, if like me, N_D and the majority here, you prefer them live, I still can't see the problem with that kinda talk. I keep mumbling on at my ladyfriend how I'd like to Talena Atfield to a pottery course all the time, it's just harmless crap. Yeah, I may get ignored for a few days, but it's all good.
I didn't see the pron stuff though, so I can't really comment on the straw that broke the camels back, so to speak.
Hell, I'd worry if I stopped talking abuot women, any of 'em. I don't think I'm implying I'm having a 'relationship' with Talena Atfield when I say she's a babe. She is. I think it's wrong however to jump to the conclusion that I'm shagging my PC monitor instead of getting some real...well...y'know
As with anything on a public forum, you don't have to click on the thread title.
So, I guess this isn't a good opportunity to start talking about Ms Berry in Die Another Day, then?
- 349
Originally posted by GilesGuthrie
I don't know why people do it anyway, because all that ever happens is some other user comes in and says "Ugh, she's a pig, you suck".
One would hope for some..better...discussion instead of one of those lovely "you suck" comment. [cue someone telling me I suck
] 
- 883
So what your trying to say is that, becuase some of us (like me) are 15 (turning 16 in 9 days), that we haven't had sex with a LIVE women before. Nice generalization even though its wrong.
- 10,840
Originally posted by GilesGuthrie
Well written as always Neon_Duke...
The real problem with it is that there are so many fine creatures in the real world that talking about celebrities becomes dull beyond belief. I have my own favourites of those people in public life as I'm sure everyone does. The thing is that my favourites are not necessarily the same as your favourites, and unless you want to have an educated, reasoned discussion about the socio-economic demographics involved regarding why I like someone and you like someone else, then it just becomes a war over who's got the best fantasy world.
And one thing that a lot of people have failed to realise is that a lot of women in this world (I assume this applies to men also), are so much more attractive in real life than in photographs, that it makes the medium of photography almost laughable. They say the camera never lies, well it never tells the whole truth, either.
Interaction is about so much more than drooling over a picture and then posting mindless slavering nonsense about how "this chick's so hot she ownzzz". ZZZ indeed, or should that be :sleep:
I don't know why people do it anyway, because all that ever happens is some other user comes in and says "Ugh, she's a pig, you suck".
Very nicely put Giles, and a different angle on it than anyone else so far. I agree. There are some famous women who I find above average on the attractiveness scale, but all I've ever seen and all I will ever see of them is a 2D representation. For that reason alone it's hard to get too excited about it. They are not real to me, just ideas, mental images. A very attractive, tangeable, and real Miss "not famous" is much more exciting. She's not on this monitor. She's in my living room. Think I'll go have a look...
- 24,120
- Midlantic Area
- GTP_Duke
It's true, you don't have to click on a thread title, and I don't. But that doesn't help in the case of thread piracy, which happens a lot more often than easily-ignored (assuming they are clearly titled) threads on the subject.
Most frequently, I'll be following a thread on an actual interesting subject, and halfway through it'll get jacked by a bunch of idiots drooling over somebody's avatar babe or the latest 'object of the week'. So, I either have to write off participation in that thread (and remember to ignore that particular title), or I have to check a dozen times when it says there is a new post, only to find the discussion is still centered around someone's breasts. It's really boring, incredibly annoying, and totally unnecessary on this site.
This issue is not at all about whether you like porn or not - I couldn't care less about people's tastes on that score. The issue is that there are hundreds of appropriate outlets for that material and those discussions, so don't bring them here where it's not appropriate.
Your mother and I are very proud.
I'm sure everyone's very impressed that you're such a stud, but did this contribute to the discussion? Nope. Just more of what I'm talking about. Don't you have some homework to do?
- 6,669
- California
- Axidwulv
Originally posted by Concept
Women who pose nude for porn are whores. That is just my opinion.
Well said by the way neon_duke. Very well said. :thumbsup:
Personally, i believe any girl that has the chance to pose in Playboy isnt a whore. Playboy is a good mag, its not all about the actual sex and such of a regular smut-filled magazine, its more "exotic" i guess. Surely not all girls that pose nude are whores, but 90% can be considered so.
Anyway, that was way off topic and probably shouldnt have been discussed here, sorry.
Very well said Neon.
:thumbsup:
- 24,883
- Somewhere.
you say that only because you've got miss November 2k1 on your ceiling...
nothing pisses me off more than that. you're trying to find valuable information, and then one guy goes and talks about the hot women in the other's avatar... PM him if you really want to know!
- 13,716
- Indiana
- ViperManiac
Mmmmm Carmen Electra. 
