Bugatti is pretty strict about what you can do the cars because ultimately, they are the ones who want to distance themselves if something goes wrong.Speaking of Veyron, I'm surprised that no one has attempted to squeeze another 1000 HP into that W16.
For example, my dads car is producing nearly 500BHP and it only weighs 1000kg.
What is it then...sounds like a Pulsar GTi-R that's been massively modified![]()
Perfect BalanceMost people on here just see "numbers" and judge a car how fast it is with those, when in reality, any car over 500whp or so is enough to be scary to drive. The internet has simply skewed people's thought into thinking cars with 300-400whp can't be ridiculously fast.
My brother in law's Maxima has a turbo vq35 swap. It made 353whp and on 255 Dunlop Star Specs it can light them up in the first three gears just by rolling on the throttle. That is with an LSD as well, so it's not a one wheel peel. With 500whp or so it would probably be able to spin the tires in any gear at will. RWD can handle more power, but 1k is more than anyone will ever need on anything other than a drag strip.
Most people on here just see "numbers" and judge a car how fast it is with those, when in reality, any car over 500whp or so is enough to be scary to drive. The internet has simply skewed people's thought into thinking cars with 300-400whp can't be ridiculously fast.
My brother in law's Maxima has a turbo vq35 swap. It made 353whp and on 255 Dunlop Star Specs it can light them up in the first three gears just by rolling on the throttle. That is with an LSD as well, so it's not a one wheel peel. With 500whp or so it would probably be able to spin the tires in any gear at will. RWD can handle more power, but 1k is more than anyone will ever need on anything other than a drag strip.
Most people on here just see "numbers" and judge a car how fast it is with those, when in reality, any car over 500whp or so is enough to be scary to drive.
Maybe you need 300bhp in modern cars but in older lightweight cars 200bhp or less is plenty to get you into trouble
Maybe you need 300bhp in modern cars but in older lightweight cars 200bhp or less is plenty to get you into trouble. It's not really possible to put an exact figure for how much power is too much, because of too many variables, depending on who's driving the cars and what they want to do with the car, like trying to get fast lap times, drifting or drag racing.
Even less, really. A basic 1.6-engined Caterham with no more than 110-odd horsepower can do 60mph in somewhere between 5-6 seconds and do quite high corner speeds - enough to get someone into trouble if they made a mistake.
I agree though, there are plenty of factors which dictate "too much" power.
Including the era in which you live. In the 1980s the 1000bhp+ F1 cars were considered to have too much power in terms of safety, but now if you've got the dosh you can walk into a Bugatti showroom and drive out in a car with radio and aircon with that sort of power.
Or personal circumstances. I don't have a lot of money at the moment, so to me I'm looking for as much fun from a car as possible while spending as little as possible on fuel (a powerful car you can't afford to drive is no fun at all), so power isn't a big factor in the sort of cars I like. Give me a massive wadge of cash and I may take more of an interest in it.
That will only work to a certain horsepower figure & highly depends on the cars involved. 300-400Hp Miatas are fast, but they are no match for bigger cars like the Corvettes, Vipers, Supras, & GT-Rs once they start outputting over 700hp. At that point, the Miata can only be built to so much power while the latter has the option to go as far as to double 700whp.I'd rather have a very light car (<2500lbs) with strong power than a heavier car (>3000lbs) with absurd power. You can end up having two cars with a very similar power to weight ratio, say a 4,000lbs car with 800hp and a 2,000lbs car with 400hp and the lighter car will probably be much faster (at least until aero comes into the equation at high speed). Not only do you have to consider power to weight, but you have to consider power to traction. Assuming they are both rwd and not tubbed out drag cars (because drag cars on the street are stupid) the 800hp car will have considerable difficulty putting that power down through it's two rear tires. Meanwhile the lighter car's tires only have 400hp to deal with PLUS a lighter car to shove along. You see cars like the Ariel Atom and Caterham R500 explode off the line because there isn't really that much power, just incredibly low weight.
In the end:
Low weight > Huge Power
To that end, I'm trying to gather parts to do a 20b (N/A peripheral port) powered MX-5...
You're right. Those people are idiots, because real car enthusiasts will the see the bargain that is 300Hp for just $22,000, regardless of the engine. There's no denying most cars in that price range are almost 100Hp down from that.I think Pirelli put it best with their slogan, "Power is nothing without control."
And I agreed with PB, the Internet has created this belief that all cars now need to have huge horsepower number to mean anything. I think the '12 Mustang V6 is a perfect example of this. People will babble on about how it has no performance or was only built for girls, truth be told this people are idiots. The V6 Mustang has 300hp, a 0-60 between 5.0-5.5 sec. depending on the source, and a 1/4 mile time in the high 13's. I mean the 5.0 Mustang has a 0-60 of around 4.5 sec and a quarter mile in the low 13's. It's not that much of a staggering different all thing considered.
McLarenYou're right. Those people are idiots, because real car enthusiasts will the see the bargain that is 300Hp for just $22,000, regardless of the engine. There's no denying most cars in that price range are almost 100Hp down from that.
But, people didn't like the V6 Mustangs before because they were slow, and they were "girl's" cars. 210Hp in a Mustang was almost shameful a couple years ago when folks realize the Japanese cars were making much better use of 200Hp.
The only thing the internet has done though, is allowed people to come onto the web to show off their 200-400Hp, 13-14 sec.+ cars & claim that they are fast and they can amazingly beat 80% of cars on the road. That's not a hard accomplishment. But if that's "fast", what's a 458? Super fast? A Veyron? Ludicrous? Now picture a basic looking Supra/Gallardo that's even faster than that. How do you describe that if "fast" is a car that can 0-60 in 5 seconds?
It's like how Louis CK condemns those who overuse the term, "amazing" & asks what they would consider if Jesus came back since they used the term, "amazing" on something silly.