I ask you...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Duke
  • 26 comments
  • 968 views

Duke

Keep 'em separated
Staff Emeritus
Messages
24,344
United States
Midlantic Area
Messages
GTP_Duke
Why are some people in such denial?

1958_Chevrolet_Corvette.jpg


bmw-z4-0729.jpg
 
You're either trying to show that the Z4 is derived from the Vette or that it isn't. I can't tell.

They're both rag-top roadsters, but I'd rather have the Z4.
 
Originally posted by Rumple Foreskin
I believe he is talking about the styling perhaps being similar. :confused:
👍 👍 👍

The Bangle Z4 is a complete ripoff of the 1958 Vette. Yet a noted Bangle-defender here maintains that the Z4 is totally unrelated.

Hogwash.
 
Yeah, some styling cues may have been played on, but to call it a rip off may be going a little far.
 
I know which one i'd rather have, derivative or not...
 
Perhaps I am alone in the world, after all.
 
I think you're stretching here.

I can compare these two cars in a similar fashion:

AO
 

Attachments

  • 84-fiero.jpg
    84-fiero.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 131
and this one:

AO
 

Attachments

  • mr2-4.jpg
    mr2-4.jpg
    36.8 KB · Views: 124
But they are contemporaries. And neither of them sucked.
 
Same thing with the 944, rx7 fc3s, and the mark III supra.
 
I don't think they look a whole lot alike (the Corvette and Z4 that is). I mean alot of cars look alike, it's not that big of a deal really.
 
Dont think they look that similar really, Can see why people think it though
 
On AIM he made the claim, first, that the Z4 was 'no improvement' over the outgoing Z3 and called it a land shark, then he said it looked just like the 1958 Corvette. In my opinion, it would be hard for two cars to look any more dissimilar than these two.
 
It could be said that the GM Engineers copied the BMW 507 to make the 1958 Vette

Kristof
 

Attachments

  • bmw507.jpg
    bmw507.jpg
    22.5 KB · Views: 63
Originally posted by frestkd
It could be said that the GM Engineers copied the BMW 507 to make the 1958 Vette

Kristof

It could be said, but it wouldn't be correct.:)
 
Originally posted by neon_duke
👍 👍 👍

The Bangle Z4 is a complete ripoff of the 1958 Vette. Yet a noted Bangle-defender here maintains that the Z4 is totally unrelated.

Hogwash.


Well I don't think BMW has ever denied the Z3/Z4 line is an homage to the 'traditional roadster'. Its got a long nose, short tail and the driver sits close to the rear axle. The lines on the Z4 look the way they do because a lot of traditional roadsters look like that. There is also no denying the 507 also played a big role in how the Z-series looks.

The design owes as much to the AC Ace, Triumph Spitfire, Austin Healey 3000 and Jaguar E type as it does to the Vette.

But giving GM credit where credit is due... the Corvette did set impressive benchmarks for 50s and 60s roadster design. Ironically, the reason Corvette exists is because GM wanted a domestic competitor to the British sports cars American GIs came to love while they were in Europe.


///M-Spec
 
Originally posted by Rumple Foreskin
It could be said, but it wouldn't be correct.:)


The BMW 507 was first shown in early 1956. GM showed the re-designed C2 in what.. mid-'57?

The facts would seem to support the argument.


///M-Spec
 
Originally posted by DonnyRacerGTR
the bmw z4 the simerla modle as the one on the top of this topic

****ing what?
 
It's "word jazz", don't analyze it, man, you'll kill the subtle flow of the vibe...
 
Originally posted by ///M-Spec
The BMW 507 was first shown in early 1956. GM showed the re-designed C2 in what.. mid-'57?

The facts would seem to support the argument.


///M-Spec


Doh! :banghead: HAHA

Kristof
 
I was going to compare Hyundai's ripoff of Toyota's MR2.

The car is the Hyundai S-coupe...Ill see if I can find some comparisons.
 
Back