- 1,445
- The Motherland
- Manasseh257
I want to know if this idea I have for future tournaments is fair.
So right now I am hosting a series, (GT WorldWide Tour) and it has 3 classes. However, the LMP2 Class is extremely teetered as well as the GTE class. I plan on having another season but with more specs and more sanctioning.
With stricter sanctioning, I am thinking about having lap time cutoffs for each class. I would do this by setting a minimum time for each class on a test track and if the driver cannot make the minimum time, they will have to change their class or (If in the GTE Class) change their vehicle
(i.e. Driver xx signs up for the LMP1 class with xx car. We go to Silverstone to test or "Tryout" I guess you can say, and the minimum time set to race in the LMP1 class is a time of 1:51 [At Silverstone] Driver xx runs 5 laps but is unable to run the time required. He therefore has to change classes to compete. This will be the same for the LMP2 class with a different set time. For the GTE class, you will have to switch your car or tune it until you are able to make minimum time [GTE minimum time is very lenient and doable unless one has a 550pp car])
By this it keeps the driving competition tight and puts everybody in their best suited category so everyone is having fun.
My question is, is this a fair and clean method of grouping everyone in their best suited class so the races can be clean, competitive, and fun? Or is this unfair? As every car does handle different and sometimes the settings just need to be tweaked to run said time?
(Also this goes for me too. If I can't make the minimum time I will have to switch classes)
So right now I am hosting a series, (GT WorldWide Tour) and it has 3 classes. However, the LMP2 Class is extremely teetered as well as the GTE class. I plan on having another season but with more specs and more sanctioning.
With stricter sanctioning, I am thinking about having lap time cutoffs for each class. I would do this by setting a minimum time for each class on a test track and if the driver cannot make the minimum time, they will have to change their class or (If in the GTE Class) change their vehicle
(i.e. Driver xx signs up for the LMP1 class with xx car. We go to Silverstone to test or "Tryout" I guess you can say, and the minimum time set to race in the LMP1 class is a time of 1:51 [At Silverstone] Driver xx runs 5 laps but is unable to run the time required. He therefore has to change classes to compete. This will be the same for the LMP2 class with a different set time. For the GTE class, you will have to switch your car or tune it until you are able to make minimum time [GTE minimum time is very lenient and doable unless one has a 550pp car])
By this it keeps the driving competition tight and puts everybody in their best suited category so everyone is having fun.
My question is, is this a fair and clean method of grouping everyone in their best suited class so the races can be clean, competitive, and fun? Or is this unfair? As every car does handle different and sometimes the settings just need to be tweaked to run said time?
(Also this goes for me too. If I can't make the minimum time I will have to switch classes)