Is Sega GT 2002 a threat to Sony's GT?

1027592493.jpg
1027592484.jpg
1027592486.jpg

1027592314.jpg
1025414143.jpg
1024958565.jpg
1024958253.jpg


I'm getting too carried away here... Too-Many-Awsome-Cars! Ahh!
Just check em out youselves.
They start here.
 
I saw the pics on the link, I was shocked to the highest level!!! :eek: Almost everything we wished for in the GT4 wishlist is on SGT 2002!! Man look at these cars that I saw (some of 'em are on GT, so will mention the cars that are not included in the GT series):
-Mitsubishi Starion
-Mazda RX-3
-Alfa Romeo 155
-A 1960's Alfa Romeo
-Audi Turbo Quattro
-Dodge Charger
-Caterham Speed 7
-Jaguar E-Type
-1st gen Toyota Celica
-1st gen Toyota Sprinter
-Nissan 280Z
-A 1970's Chevy Camaro

And thats just a warm up! I'll go to gamespot.com for more pics and cars to unveil. :cool:
 
I just went to gamespot.com heres what I see (and some I didn't typed earlier):
Extras that didn't include in GT series:
*Interactive Garage
*Interactive Dealer
And some cars that I almost forgot to mention earlier:
-2002 Alfa Romeo 146
-A fantasy car called "Zero" (looks a lot like the Lancia Stratos)

Duh.
 
First go to Gamespot.com, click the box 'XBox'.
Then @ the XBox section then select the games that you want on the box icon and choose the title you want and there you go, click the 'screenshots' and enjoy the show!

A healthy tip to you!!!
 
Originally posted by kyle
Ethanol
The only thing the x box has on the ps2 is graphics. IMO its not better in any other way. The PS2 has easier DVD remote, something you have to "unlock" with the Xbox, no backward compatitability with the X-Box so you have to buy a $60 ho-hum game, the x-box is huge and the PS2 is smaller, and the X-Box has only one perfect game which is called Halo. Meanwhile the PS2 you have GT3, GTA3, MGS2, and other great games that the X-box doesn't have.

to put it simply x-bocks SUCKS
#1 reason x-bocks DOESNT have GTA3, or GTA Vice City
as big a a vcr
crashes alot, skips alot
sucky games
p3 geforce3.......sounds like a PC and if you want a PC get something with an athlon/intel4

and if your comparing Sega GT 2002 to a game that came out 1 year ago, that is kind of a weak comparision....
how about comparing sega GT 2002 vs GT concept?????
 
I feel all healthy now! :D Direct Link

Thanx Vanishing.

to put it simply x-bocks SUCKS
#1 reason x-bocks DOESNT have GTA3, or GTA Vice City
as big a a vcr
crashes alot, skips alot
sucky games
p3 geforce3.......sounds like a PC and if you want a PC get something with an athlon/intel4

Okay... The reason Sony made Rockstar sign a 4 year console exclusivity contract for the PS2, is that they felt threatened by Microsofts Xbox, and Nintendo's Gamecube. Why else would they do it? With a powerhouse like Gta3, PS2 is practically guaranteed the #1 spot for the Next 4 years.

Xbox Doesn't 'crash', you're obviously just pulling this out of your *ss so it doesn't need clarifying.

And It will most likely only skip if a dumbass like 1mic tries to stand it up like a PS2. But like every comsole, it does occasionally skip, no more or no less than a PS2 or GameCube.

You obviously don't know **** about games, so thats solved.

P3 733Mhz, Geforce 3.5, 10GB HD, $200, sounds good. They simply chose the most cost effective way to produce a gaming console.

And WHERE THE **** DID YOU LEARN TO SPELL!?
It's not 'X-box' and it sure as hell isn't 'X-Bocks' !!!
It's just plain 'Xbox' ('X-box' was a codename for the project when it first started 2 years ago) It is no longer 'X-box' but 'Xbox'.

If you think Xbox is a Failure, you need to get your facts straight you retarded fanboy piece of ****.

PS2 launched on 10/26/00. On 5/16/01 ps2.ign.com Reported that the PS2 had shipped 3.7 million Playstation 2 units in the US 7 months after US launch.

And News.com reports that 7 months, and 15 days after the Xbox launch it had shipped 3.9 million units worldwide.

You have to consider that at the time those Xbox shipped figures were calculated, there were only 286,000 units in Japan. And only about 500,000 in Europe.

That Means:

Playstation 2: 3.7million
Xbox: 3.72million

You also have to consider that PS2 had been out in Japan for over a year at the US launch, and alraedy had numerous good titles and some pretty good developer support.

So if you think Xbox is a faliure, then PS2 is ****en cheapass dime store peice of **** console. Which it's not. It has dozens of awsome titles, more titles than Xbox has.




Well congratulations Dumb*ss you've officially wasted 15 minsof my life. 15 minutes that I can't get back!!! :mad:
 
Originally posted by Genocide
I feel all healthy now! :D blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,blah,
who gives a ****???
:lol: X bocks sucks PERIOD
and quit talking about asses your prolly a HOMO and ass loving FAG, but u dont have to talk about asses when it comes to games/consoles....
and u said wasted 15 mins of your life.....:lol: AHAHAHHA
u have a life???
truly not if your offended by what i said about your gay x-bocks, which u make love to everynite
:lol:
 
ok if ps2 is a piece of crap like you, then dont buy one
i would only buy a x-bocks for 1 reason and thats to blow it up to see what microsoft uses to build these cheap weak, over-hyped 20lbs... waste of SPACE- garbage boxes
 
Originally posted by 1mic
or to put it in even SIMPLER terms:
x-bocks SUCKS
or you can say X-box was a FAILURE

Why all the hatin on the X-box? I have one and I love it. It definitely aint a failure. :rolleyes:
 
i dont wana waste my money on X-garbage :)
maybe wen its available for 50 bucks, like the dreamcast then i'll buy it :)
 
1mic, you're sure being :mad: @ the Bocks is something worth it.

Another thing, I'm rooting for PS2, but the 'Box is playing 'catching up' with Sony. Right now PS3 is on the development stage which is the real treat with the XBox, which Microsoft has a plan of its own that we don't even know.

SGT 2002 is like the 'GT1' for the XBox, and PD and the team is ready for it (GT4). ;)
 
i dont own an XBox, and i just got my first chance to play one. my neighbor has Halo. its a pretty sweet game, and has nice graphics and gameplay.

i cant justify spending the money on it, though. id much rather use that money for buying PS2 games. luckily for me, a lot of games i like are released on ps2 & xbox, or ps2 exclusively. ill only miss out on a few exclusive xbox games.
 
Originally posted by The Vanishing Boy
SGT 2002 is like the 'GT1' for the XBox, and PD and the team is ready for it (GT4). ;)

Actually, it'd be the GT2 for the Xbox - Sega GT was released for the Dreamcast - not a bad game, but the controls left something to be desired.

But who is counting. :)
 
But on XBox, seeing that they can use more power(them having a 733mhz processing chip compared to the PS2's optimized 200mhz chip.) If it's just like RR5, it won't be any good. Just remember this:

If we only bought games for their graphics, there'd be a lot more XBox and GameCube players. We mainly buy games if they're addicting, have good gameplay, and don't have absolutly horrible graphics that they hurt your eyes. I don't mean any low-end graphics, because I still love to play my NES, but things like RR5, where they couldn't get the cars to be smooth and they were ALWAYS jagged, not even attempted at being smoothed out.

So, bottom line, it better have good physics, gameplay, controls, and no graphics that you will consistantly see.
 
I prefer the PS2 primarily for 3 reasons, viz., the physical size of the xbox seems twice that of the PS2 while half the size of a CPU, secondly, the controller pad feels clunky to me (even though I liked playing Spiderman and Timesplitters 2 on it) and thirdly, GT3.

Each system has its own advantages but I ,somehow, have developed a bias for Sony these last few years.
 
Back