I'm going to re-start this thread in light of the news that the WRC is going to be shortened from 2009. Instead of 16 events, we'll be getting just 12. And why? Because it's too expensive for television crews to get out to the destinations.
I visited the "last" Rally Australia in 2005 (we had it again in 2006 because Perth missed the closing date to withdraw), and I remember some of the commentary from Ross Dunkerton out on one of the stages. He said that rallying is a funny mistress, because you're standing out under a baking sun, you sweat until you're dry (usually about an hour after arriving) and you're getting harrassed by flies and insects (I swear Western Australia breeds a few that are resistent to repellant) when a car blasts past. "Who was that!?" you call out once the dust settles. She's a funny mistress, our ralling, but you just love her to death.
Television crews shouldn't dictate the sport. Rally routes have been hampered because the crews can't make it out in time. But what about us, the fans and spectators who go there? We're more than willing to jump in a car and go tearing halfway across the state, watch the WRC cars and maybe a few Group Ns because getting back in the car and haring off into the middle of nowhere (again) to rinse, lather and repeat. It's all part of the fun. Instead, some excellent stages haven't been used in years while the drivers waste time doing re-runs of stages!
What rallying needs is its own version of the Concorde Agreement. 2002 was one of the last times we saw full manufacturer support with Peugeot, Ford, Subaru, Mitsubishi, Hyundai, Skoda and Citroen all pledging works cars. Sure, teams need time off to develop a new car, but shouldn't they be doing that either in the off-season or elsewhere while the current championship is running? I'm sick of teams saying "Well, we're coming back, but we're only doing half a season." Teams that agree to compete should either pledge full support to a season or not at all.
We need to ditch SuperRally. Sure, it adds to the excitement that drivers can re-enter if they retire, but it reomves any and all skill from the competition. Once you're out, you're out. And if it's your own fault, you shouldn't be given another chance just to keep television happy. Having one chance means drivers will not only be more careful, but they'll demonstrate that they are the best. Now we just get competitors taking risks knowing that if they end up out of the event, they can just re-enter witha five-minute penalty (which is nothing these days).