Just eyeball it.

  • Thread starter Thread starter exigeracer
  • 47 comments
  • 2,202 views

What did you score?

  • <2.5

    Votes: 7 13.2%
  • <2.8

    Votes: 4 7.5%
  • <3.1

    Votes: 5 9.4%
  • <3.4

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • <3.7

    Votes: 8 15.1%
  • <4.0

    Votes: 4 7.5%
  • <4.3

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • <4.6

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • >4.61

    Votes: 19 35.8%

  • Total voters
    53
i didnt even know what Bisect angle and Triangle center meant, which lead to my avg of about 6.0 on my 1st try...
 
I got 5.48 on my first try, and the bisections were under 2.0. Although I made a triangle centre 16.0 when I didn't understand it.
 
I got a 4.15, but they should reduce it to two runs per shape, because I was done playing by then and sorta sped through the rest. I did manage a couple 1.0s and a 0.5.
 
Your inaccuracy by category:

Parallelogram 15.0 7.2 18.8
Midpoint 3.6 5.0 16.1
Bisect angle 6.7 0.6 0.1
Triangle center 1.8 2.0 3.5
Circle center 3.2 2.0 6.3
Right angle 3.1 5.4 2.7
Convergence 9.1 19.3 15.7


Average error: 7.01 (lower is better)

FAIL.

So call of duty 4 isnt the only thing you suck at. Thats good to know. haha.


Parallelogram 8.9 5.8 5.0
Midpoint 0.0 3.6 6.4
Bisect angle 2.5 3.2 0.9
Triangle center 2.8 3.1 4.9
Circle center 3.2 6.3 6.4
Right angle 0.5 0.6 1.1
Convergence 6.1 3.2 9.1

Average error: 3.98 (lower is better)

I suck too.
 
image1bh9.gif


There. Now you no longer have the worst score.
 
Darn, the worst I could come up with was "only" 763.21. The best, however (fourth or fifth try overall) was:

Parallelogram 6.0 4.5 5.1
Midpoint 5.1 2.8 1.0
Bisect angle 0.3 0.1 4.7
Triangle center 6.6 1.8 1.4
Circle center 1.0 1.4 1.4
Right angle 0.2 1.5 1.0
Convergence 0.0 2.2 4.5

Average error: 2.50

Much better than before! I actually hit 0.0 on the first convergence in the previous game, too.
 
So, I'm still the best?
That would be a no.

number3rg3.png


Besides. Last time I checked, just saying you got a 2.25 with no proof to back it up doesn't mean much.
 
Really cool game. Nice find 👍. Got 2.41 after 3 tries. The hardest for me is finding the point equidistant from the triangle edges. Just can't get that into my mind's eye :banghead:.

Your inaccuracy by category:

Parallelogram 5.8 3.2 4.1
Midpoint 2.2 5.0 2.2
Bisect angle 0.3 0.6 1.2
Triangle center 3.6 9.4 3.8
Circle center 2.0 1.4 0.0
Right angle 0.9 1.3 0.7
Convergence 1.0 1.0 1.0


Average error: 2.41 (lower is better)




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Best of the last 500 games: (more)

1.71
2.06 GTP_TB
2.14 Titi-CN
2.27 sprnkt
2.27 Dom
2.28 yi
2.33 Timbit!
2.41 GTP_LeGeNd-1
2.43 meverett
2.49

C'mon GTP'ers, let's try to conquer the board :D.
 
Your inaccuracy by category:

Parallelogram 2.0 2.2 7.1
Midpoint 3.2 2.0 5.4
Bisect angle 0.6 0.5 0.5
Triangle center 1.9 3.4 1.7
Circle center 3.2 2.0 2.0
Right angle 0.0 2.6 0.2
Convergence 1.0 2.0 2.0

Average error: 2.17 (lower is better)


Best of the last 500 games: (more)

1.43 UniK Meng
2.00 khl
2.02 Tim F.
2.08 katabi ni jensen
2.17 91hondawagon
2.20 Dan
2.41 liujun2002_hehe
2.41 GTP_LeGeNd-1
2.43 Heidi
2.43 EnzoHsieh

Best scores on this computer:

2.17 91hondawagon
 
TB
image1bh9.gif


There. Now you no longer have the worst score.

I've thought about a campaign to intentionally skew the curve. I'm sure there's a level it decides to ignore, but how bad could we make it and get all those under-achievers towards the thick part?


Wait. No. They're underachievers! Why should they be in the thick part?

I was just reading up on Democratic Party politics. Wow, they almost got me!
 
Wow, that's pretty cool. 5.70 the first time, with all but one being <10 units away. The one that wasn't was a mistake, I was putting it in the right place but hit the right mouse button instead of the left, causing a menu to come up. I had to click away from it to make it go away, and the program counted that as my guess. Argh! It was 37.5 units away.:ouch:

:-)
 
My first average was 3.48. My right angles were nearly bang-on, one of them being 0.0 error. I also did well at the point of convergence diagrams, with less than a 2.0 error on all of them. The equidistant diagrams were tough--I've never really payed much attention to that in school od\r in real life at all, whereas I'm very used to angles and lines and whatnot. I'm surprised I didn't do as good as I thought with the circles, either. I think it's more difficult on a computer than on paper, because the more I looked at the circles the less round they actually looked. :lol: Now, I know a round circle when I see one, and there's no way those suckers were round.
 
First score: 3.47

I'm using my MacBook's trackpad for this. I'd like to give it a go with a mouse sometime.
 
I got 2.83, fairly pleased with that, it made it onto the leaderboard anyway. :)
 
Last edited:
Back