- 2,254
- Burlington, NC, USA
- a_garris/Vol_Jbolaz
A handful of thoughts:
I vote for 60+ laps that GVE-R. I think it should be long enough that we will have to pit. I don't want to vote for too long (I do have to get to bed), but I know I would enjoy it being longer.
Drivers that can't attend should probably be handled like drivers that get dropped. I would vote for no championship points and average pay. And I'll try to explain that a little...
To me, the appeal of this series is the hope that it will help drivers balance out. In most online races I'm in, and in the last league I was in, I would see the pack through the first turn or two and that was it. I would be driving by myself. I wouldn't be racing, I'd just be driving on the course at the same time a race was going on.
Because of this balancing, it is hard to say how much a driver will "improve" from week to week. It is hoped that the difference in money award to the last place driver over the first place driver will be enough to make him competitive the next week. If the driver that missed the race was not one of the last place drivers, then that difference may be enough to make him unbeatable.
By the same token, if he was not one of the first place drivers, and we only award the minimum, then he may not be competitive at all.
For this reason, I say we should award the average amount of money and hope that the driver that misses a race isn't too crippled or empowered by this.
Now... to the races...
I did poorly at Autumn Ring, but honestly, I did better than I expected. I did lap a couple other drivers, but I don't take any thing positive from that. I had a smaller AWD. They had heavier FRs. They will be much faster on a more open track like GVE-R.
What I do take something positive from is I was able to shadow people that passed me for more than just two turns. I could follow some for more than a lap. Invariably though, I would push too hard, go too wide, and watch them pull away.
I can drive very clean through the course, but doing so means I drive very slowly. To actually race, one needs to drive at that edge where they are going as fast as they can and still drive clean.
I feel that I will still be somewhat competitive at GVE-R. I won't had the advantage over the large FRs that I had at Autumn Ring, but there is more than one place where I can open it up, and my car is probably has one of the highest (if not the highest) power to weight ratios. Again, I'll count it a victory if I 1) can actually stay with other cars for more than two corners, and 2) don't finish last.
As to my car having an advantage at GVE-R, I still fear I chose poorly. Later in the season, my little car won't be able to keep up with the heavier ones. They will have much more horsepower, and without downforce, my light weight and short wheel base may make this car very temperamental. We'll see how it goes, but I'm wondering if I should've gone with the heavier, longer GT-R.
I vote for 60+ laps that GVE-R. I think it should be long enough that we will have to pit. I don't want to vote for too long (I do have to get to bed), but I know I would enjoy it being longer.
Drivers that can't attend should probably be handled like drivers that get dropped. I would vote for no championship points and average pay. And I'll try to explain that a little...
To me, the appeal of this series is the hope that it will help drivers balance out. In most online races I'm in, and in the last league I was in, I would see the pack through the first turn or two and that was it. I would be driving by myself. I wouldn't be racing, I'd just be driving on the course at the same time a race was going on.
Because of this balancing, it is hard to say how much a driver will "improve" from week to week. It is hoped that the difference in money award to the last place driver over the first place driver will be enough to make him competitive the next week. If the driver that missed the race was not one of the last place drivers, then that difference may be enough to make him unbeatable.
By the same token, if he was not one of the first place drivers, and we only award the minimum, then he may not be competitive at all.
For this reason, I say we should award the average amount of money and hope that the driver that misses a race isn't too crippled or empowered by this.
Now... to the races...
I did poorly at Autumn Ring, but honestly, I did better than I expected. I did lap a couple other drivers, but I don't take any thing positive from that. I had a smaller AWD. They had heavier FRs. They will be much faster on a more open track like GVE-R.
What I do take something positive from is I was able to shadow people that passed me for more than just two turns. I could follow some for more than a lap. Invariably though, I would push too hard, go too wide, and watch them pull away.
I can drive very clean through the course, but doing so means I drive very slowly. To actually race, one needs to drive at that edge where they are going as fast as they can and still drive clean.
I feel that I will still be somewhat competitive at GVE-R. I won't had the advantage over the large FRs that I had at Autumn Ring, but there is more than one place where I can open it up, and my car is probably has one of the highest (if not the highest) power to weight ratios. Again, I'll count it a victory if I 1) can actually stay with other cars for more than two corners, and 2) don't finish last.
As to my car having an advantage at GVE-R, I still fear I chose poorly. Later in the season, my little car won't be able to keep up with the heavier ones. They will have much more horsepower, and without downforce, my light weight and short wheel base may make this car very temperamental. We'll see how it goes, but I'm wondering if I should've gone with the heavier, longer GT-R.