Those are not "pics" per se, they are captions of an animated internet ad released by Lexus.
Here is the full add
Also, and I'm not sure if this has been posted here already, but this is a video of the
IS-F at the 'Ring.
Here is an article posted by jruhi4 from my.is:
Contains speculation on engine, transmission and the IS-F's competiton.
The Lexus IS-F: the V8 migrates to Lexus' smallest RWD vehicle. But which V8?
As is customary in Lexus' recent pattern of new product launches, the company is, at this point, being coy about which V8 will power the IS-F, how much horsepower it will pack, or even if the IS-F will or won't be a hybrid. And anyone who's been following all the IS-F rumo(u)rs and commentary will find that their head is spinning from all the contradictory information out there.
The 1UR-FSE (4.6-liter V8, 380 hp) scenario
The most straightforward possibility would seem to be that the IS-F would be powered by Lexus' first all-new V8 since the marque was launched back in late 1989: the 1UR-FSE V8 which powers the 4th-generation Lexus LS460 and LS460L. With its unique direct injection/port injection combination, it represents a quantum leap over its predecessor, the 3UZ-FE 4.3-liter, 278 hp V8. The 1UR-FSE is a 4.6-liter V8 which produces 380 hp at its 6400 rpm redline, and 367 lb/ft of torque@4100 rpm. It propels the LS460 from a standstill to 60 mph in 5.4 seconds.
Predicting its performance in a Lexus IS-F is a dicey proposition, since the new 1UR-FSE 4.6-liter V8 hasn't yet migrated to the Lexus GS, the IS's larger platform-mate. One of the closest apples-to-apples comparisons would be between the 3rd-generation GS350 and the 2nd-generation IS350, which is 177 lbs lighter than its larger sibling. Lexus' conflicting numbers, however, threaten to make this 'mission impossible". While Lexus is consistent in posting a 0-60 mph acceleration time of 5.7 seconds for the GS350, confusion reigns as far as the IS350 figures. Is it 5.6 seconds, as per the Lexus North American Pressroom and the 2006 IS brochure, or 5.3 seconds, as per the Lexus USA website? The other feasible comparison would be between the 3rd-generation GS430 and the 3rd-generation LS430, where the former's 242 lb. weight advantage knocks two-tenths of a second off the larger LS's 5.9 second 0-60 time.
Equally tricky is trying to determine the weight penalty the IS-F would incur versus the IS350. It's certainly encouraging to view the GS350 versus GS430 curb weight figures and see that the V8 is only 43 lbs heavier than the V6. Before you get all excited, however, note that the 4th-generation LS460 gained 254 lbs versus the 3rd-generation LS430. And, with a 300cc larger V8 with a more complex direct injection/port injection system, it's a near-certainty that the upcoming Lexus GS460 will heavier overall than the GS430.
A very haphazard guess, then, would put a 1UR-FSE 4.6-liter V8-powered IS-F as a 3700 lb. car capable of reaching 60 mph from a standstill in around 5 to 5.1 seconds, and a ¼-mile time of 13.7 seconds. As to fuel economy and avoiding the Gas Guzzler Tax, it's a no-brainer that putting the LS460 powerplant in a 400-500 lb. lighter body would avoid the dreaded tax handily enough that we can all seriously consider...
The 2UR-FSE Hybrid (5-liter V8, 430+ hp) scenario
This would be simply, as the subtitle implies, placing the LS600hL powertrain in the Lexus IS to create the IS-F. But is it really that simple? As a recent post in the my.IS Roundtable shows us, the penalties involved with a hybrid powertrain are not insignificant. The Lexus GS450h Hybrid exacts a 430 lb. weight increase versus the non-hybrid GS350 with which it shares the 2GR-FSE 3.5-liter V6. A look at the scant specifications available for the Lexus LS600hL reveals that, unlike the GS450h, the V8 hybrid powertrain is available only with all-wheel-drive. Adding AWD to a Lexus IS250 adds a 216-lb. penalty, and the GS350 AWD is 165 lbs. heavier than the RWD version. So, if you start with an estimated 3700 lb. curb weight for a non-hybrid, 4.6-liter V8 IS-F, and add all of the above (plus, the extra 400cc of the 2UR-FSE versus the 1UR-FSE aren't exactly weightless), and you're looking at a 4300-4350 lb. car. Is this what Lexus really wants for the IS-F?
Add to the above a trunk that would shrink from 13 cubic feet to roughly 7.8 cubic feet (to make room for the hybrid batteries), unimproved highway fuel economy and the cost penalties, and the idea of a hybrid IS-F is, hopefully, a non-starter. That leaves us with the most tantalizing possibility for the IS-F's power:
The 2UR-FSE (5-liter V8, 425 hp) scenario
Aside from being the diehard enthusiast's favorite, this possibility is the one most mentioned by Internet articles on the IS-F. Basically, it involves using the 2UR-FSE 5-liter V8 from the upcoming LS600h and LS600hL minus the hybrid hardware and the all-wheel-drive. There would only be a very slight weight penalty versus the circa 3700 lbs. predicted for a 4.6-liter, 1UR-FSE-powered IS-F. 0-60 mph times should easily drop below 5 seconds, to 4.8 or 4.9 seconds. Direct injection is a major game-changer when it comes to extracting both maximum performance fuel economy and maximum fuel economy from an engine. Thus, we'd expect Lexus to pull this one off without incurring a Gas Guzzler Tax penalty.
The transmission: What can we expect?
Naturally, the aforementioned diehard enthusiasts among us are longing and craving for a proper clutch-pedaled manual transmission. Don't count on it, though, and it'll be a major miracle if it happens. For one thing, Toyota/Lexus has NEVER combined a manual transmission with one of their V8s, and neither has archrival Mercedes-Benz, not even in any of its AMG models nor in the McLaren SLR supercar. BMW's original plans for the current V10 M5 and upcoming V8 M3 were for offering them only with the SMG clutchless manual. An uproar from customers led them to relent and offer a traditional manual-with-a-clutch in the new M5. Unfortunately, Car and Driver, in its upcoming February 2007 issue, prefaces a test of the BMW M5 manual against the Audi S6 and Mercedes E63 AMG with "be careful what you wish for". The BMW M5 manual was slower (by about 0.2 seconds) 0-60 mph than the SMG version, and unlike the SMG, the manual doesn't allow for fully turning off the electronic traction and stability control "nannies". This, plus the ever-panned iDrive led to a third (last) place showing by the M5 in this comparison test. And when even a Porsche 911 Turbo is 0.2 seconds faster 0-60 with the Tiptronic automatic than with a traditional manual, it's definitely a new day in performance transmissions, one that we diehard traditionalists lament.
Most sources predict that the Lexus IS-F will use the AA80E 8-speed torque-converter automatic from the Lexus LS460, albeit modified for quicker and sharper shifting response and with steering-wheel paddles (again paralleling the modifications AMG applies to "regular" Mercedes automatics).
There's a school of thought, however, that believes (or hopes) that Lexus will surprise us all with its take on the dual-clutch (but clutch pedal-less) transmission pioneered by Volkswagen/Audi and its DSG. Universally lauded as the best bet to eventually replace both traditional, clutch pedal manual transmissions and torque-converter manumatics, this would certainly be quite a development. And, lest you think that Lexus isn't capable of being a leader in transmission development, we remind you that, beyond having more speeds in its AA80E automatic than anyone else in the world, it wasn't that long ago that pundits were stating that continuously-variable transmissions (CVTs) couldn't handle much beyond the power of a low-stressed small V6. Yet, Lexus proved them all wrong by fitting CVTs to their performance-oriented hybrids (even the upcoming 430-440 hp 5-liter V8 LS600h/hL) without complaints of lack of reliability or massive transmission failures.
The AutoSpies article: Are they right?
We know for a fact that AutoSpies checks out my.IS' Front/Home Page regularly, since they have, in the past, posted our articles on Lexus IS vs BMW 3-Series sales, Tom Milner and Chip Ganassi. Now we're reciprocating and referring to a recent article of theirs titled The plot thickens as rumors of new Lexus IS-F and 2008 BMW M3 escalate. In brief, it claims that both the IS-F and the 2008 BMW M3 will have over 500 hp, with the larger BMW M5 eventually going to 600-700 hp.
Somewhat mystifying is their claim that "new turbo technology allows them to get AT LEAST 100HP per liter". Frankly, we wonder what the big deal is. After all, both BMW itself (with the V10 M5) and a number of Honda 4-cylinder engines have achieved 100 hp-per-liter output without any form of boost nor direct injection, and both the current 6-cylinder BMW M3 and the Honda S2000's engine (in both 2-liter and 2.2-liter iterations) exceeded that specific output without the aforementioned aids. We'll add that Audi's RS4 achieves a 100 hp-per-liter output with direct injection alone, and that more realistic rumors peg the upcoming E90/92/93 BMW M3 4-liter V8 at 400 hp.
Sure, we'd be ecstatic if the IS-F really came with a 500-hp output, but don't count on it.
The Competition: Audi S4/RS4, BMW M3, Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG
The Lexus IS-F will go on sale at a time when the offerings from its archrival German entry-luxury super sports sedan makers are in a state of flux. The 340-hp, 4.2-liter V8 Audi S4 is the only German that will soldier on unchanged in the immediate future, but it's no longer the maximum expression of an Audi A4-based performance sedan. That role has been taken over by the 420-hp Audi RS4, which adds FSI (Audi's take on direct injection) to the S4 V8, which thus enables it to reach a lofty 100-hp-per-liter specific output.
The current E46 BMW M3, with its 3.2-liter, 333-hp inline-6 is currently "on hiatus", as they say in TV-land. Its replacement E90/92/93 2008 BMW M3 is expected to be powered by a 400-hp (or 420-hp, according to Autoweek), 4-liter V8, essentially four-fifths of the BMW M5 sedan's 5-liter, 500-hp V10.
Mercedes-Benz, too, has stopped sending to North America its C55 AMG sedan, which was powered by a 5.5-liter, 362-hp V8. The next-generation, W204 Mercedes C-Class is expected to debut in March 2007 at the Geneva Auto Show, and it'll probably be 6 months to a year after that when we'll see the W204 C63 AMG. It should feature, as its name implies, AMG's latest naturally-aspirated 6.2-liter V8, probably in its mildest 475-hp state of tune as used in the CLK63 AMG (or an even "milder" 450-hp, according to AutoWeek).
The common thread in all this is that 300-something horsepower is no longer adequate for this class of car. Sure, the 380 hp that the "mildest" possible IS-F would have is an improvement over the previous versions of its German rivals, but, increasingly, it seems that you must hit or break the 400-hp barrier to be considered a serious contender in this category.
The Audi RS4 is the only one of the Lexus IS-F's archrivals for which we have official, confirmed specifications. This all-wheel-drive, 3957-lb. sedan goes from 0-60 mph in 4.8 seconds. Edmunds' Inside Line actually managed the 0-60 sprint a tenth of a second faster, and recorded a 1/4 Mile time of 13.2 seconds @ 106.8 mph.
The "lame-duck" E46 BMW M3 coupe is 130 lbs heavier than its "non-M" E46 330Ci counterpart, and the V10 BMW M5 sedan is 198 lbs. heavier than the V8 BMW 550i sedan, so it seems safe to predict that the V8 E92 BMW M3 coupe will weigh in at around 3750 lbs., some 180 lbs. over the inline-6 E92 BMW 335i coupe. A 0-60 mph time in the 4.7-second vicinity appears to be a safe bet.
Trickiest to predict are the specs for the as-yet-unreleased W204 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG. Its W203 C55 AMG predecessor weighed in at 3540 lbs. and went from 0-60 mph in 5 seconds, and the quarter mile arrived in 13.5 sec. at 106.6 mph. Arguably, the current AMG model that provides the closest point of reference for the performance of a future W204 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG is the CLK63 AMG Cabriolet, which is propelled by a 475-hp version of the 6.2-liter AMG V8, weighs 3960 lbs., and goes from 0-60 mph in 4.5 seconds.