Mass Effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter DuckRacer
  • 51 comments
  • 3,710 views

DuckRacer

Premium
Messages
10,164
Official Website

Release Date: November 20th, 2007

IGN Previews Here

Videos

PAX Developer Walkthrough Part 1

PAX Developer Walkthrough Part 2

PAX Developer Walkthrough Part 3

PAX Onstage Demo from GameSpot

E3 '07 Trailer

IGN E3 Demonstration

GameSpot E3 Demonstration

Many great videos from GameTrailers

Images

904_0005_640.jpg


1147877236_640x360.jpg


904_0004-1_640.jpg


904_0004_640.jpg


904_0003_640.jpg


904_0002-1_640.jpg


904_0002_640.jpg


904_0001_640.jpg
 
At the moment, there's not many 360 games that are exciting me, but the gameplay ad I downloaded via Xbox Live makes this look like a game I'd definitely be interested in buying. I'm gonna wait to see what the first reviews say, but this is looking like a game I'm gonna buy.


KM.
 
Kieran, if you want a good game for the 360, go for Crackdown, its a blast.
Thanks for the heads-up - I'm downloading the demo onto my Xbox right now so I can check it out.

edit: I see there's an active thread about Crackdown, so I won't discuss it any further here.

Still, that Mass Effect does look like a pretty cool game with some funky looking gameplay.


KM.
 
Another vote from me for Crackdown. I havent been this addicted to a game in a long time. I even posted 9 quick Crackdown videos. Once your skills are at level 4 the game is just insane. Try to get a co-op partner with you if you can. Its much more fun with a co-op partner especially if you have a great imagination. 👍

Now for Mass Effect, I cant seem to get into the hype. I have been trying to watch trailers and pics, reading information but I cant get excited about Mass Effect yet. I usually dont enjoy RPG games. I tried Oblivion and Kotor and they just arent for me. I heard Mass Effect is similar to those.
 
I tried Oblivion and Kotor and they just arent for me. I heard Mass Effect is similar to those.

It will most probably be very similar. Although combat is take a more "real-time" approach, the game's feel will be like KOTOR.
 
Thats the feeling I had by watching the trailers. I can honestly say I did enjoy Oblivion more than Kotor because Oblivion was hands on (real time) and I was always in control. Where Kotor was attack then wait for them to attack you. I think thats called turn based or something like that? I do not like turn based games at all.
 
In that case, i think you might want to stay away from ME then. Although i would recommend you try it out at least (rent).
 
Yeah I will probably rent it like I did Oblivion. I am open minded and at least like to try out almost every game if I can just too see how it is.
 
As far as I can tell the fighting in Mass Effect is in real time. It seems to have a RE4 over the shoulder view. You can send your team mates to locations like in Rainbow Six Las Vegas.
I know a lot of people enthuse about the facial animation etc, and it is good, but it gives me a slight uncanny valley feeling. All too often they're not quite focusing properly on who they're talking to and it all looks a bit robotic. Heavenly Sword does it better, due mainly to it all being actual performances digitised as opposed to Mass Effects more by-hand animation. Still, it looks good and as long as it plays well and at a good frame rate it's a definite buy for me.
 
As far as I can tell the fighting in Mass Effect is in real time. It seems to have a RE4 over the shoulder view. You can send your team mates to locations like in Rainbow Six Las Vegas.
I know a lot of people enthuse about the facial animation etc, and it is good, but it gives me a slight uncanny valley feeling. All too often they're not quite focusing properly on who they're talking to and it all looks a bit robotic. Heavenly Sword does it better, due mainly to it all being actual performances digitised as opposed to Mass Effects more by-hand animation. Still, it looks good and as long as it plays well and at a good frame rate it's a definite buy for me.

I do agree that it's not as good as Heavenly Sword, but HS isn't a 70-hour game that has multiple situations with each little part of a conversation. If BioWare mo-capped every conceivable situation, the game would take absolutely forever to come out...
 
...and it's already taken long enough.
Still the slightly robotic expressions do detract from the quality of the graphics. But this is nit picking really. I'm still eager to play this and hope it's out before Christmas. (It's going to be VERY expensive for me this Autumn/Winter). :scared:
 
Part of why I usually can't immerse myself into RPGs too much is the battle system - I think turn-based fighting is ridiculous and boring. It always feels like the fighting system is an afterthought and takes a back seat to the rest of the game, even when it's a major chunk of what you'll be doing. This goes for games like Knights of the Old Republic and even Final Fantasy.

I really like the over-the-shoulder real time fighting in this game though, and I think I'll really be able to get into this game a lot more because of it. I hope they've managed to make it exciting and fun.

Here's a cool HD video of in-game stuff (I guess it's from Comic-Con). I think it looks pretty damn great:

http://download.gametrailers.com/gt_vault/t_masseffect_e32k7_ingame_h264.mov
 
So I guess that confirms a November release? Damn, there's too much coming out these next few months (my wallet = :ouch:). Something's oing to have to wait until the new year. I fear it's going to be PS3 games that have to wait. Still, early 2008 looks strong for the PS3 so I guess I can have my cake and eat it, as it were.
 
I think I'll hold off until the pc version is no longer denied and announced(like Gears). maybe by next spring it will be out and my pc should run it as long as i don't need Vista....
 
I think I'll hold off until the pc version is no longer denied and announced(like Gears). maybe by next spring it will be out and my pc should run it as long as i don't need Vista....

Jade Empire took 2 years to get to PC, and it was outsourced. Mass Effect seems to be in a similar situation (being BioWare's baby and not having a publisher with ulterior motives), so expecting it in spring of '08 is wishful thinking.

And you have a 360, right? Just buy it for that when it comes out.
 
Part of why I usually can't immerse myself into RPGs too much is the battle system - I think turn-based fighting is ridiculous and boring.

I feel the exact opposite, heh... I like my console RPGs if not semi-turn based like Final Fantasies, then at least pretty laid back. More tactics, less stress.. or something like that, but I guess that's the difference between playing for challenge or for relaxation. Most RPGs could very well be a bit more difficult, though.

I was kinda looking forward to Mass Effect, but if it's gonna have that kind of battle system I think I'll stay away :indiff:
 
Well, looks like this one comes around right on time for my Birthday.

I have to decide if I want Mass Effect, or the two Jerseys (NO Saints, Bos Red Sox) I want...
 
http://au.xbox360.ign.com/articles/829/829050p1.html

IGN AU: Hi Chris, thanks for the interview.

Chris Priestly:
Thanks, no problem.

IGN AU: Let's start with a biggie. What is the total number of explorable planets in the final build?

Chris Priestly:
To be honest, I don't know the exact final number - and it depends on what you mean by explorable. In terms of the total number of celestial bodies, shall we call it, that you can visit in Mass Effect, the number is somewhere around 240 to 250. Of those, not all of them are explorable. It would be like visiting Jupiter here in our solar system; there's just nothing to do when you get there! Wow, you found a great big gas giant! If you tried to land on it, you would die instantly because the atmosphere is corrosive… so not everything you can land on. Some things you just look at and leave. Other times we have subplots where you can recover gases and strange minerals and that kind of thing - where you can do some scanning for materials.

Then there are those that are fully explorable, that are smaller and you can do on foot and some that are so large that you need to get into the Mako - the combination ATV tank that you get to use. Again, you're looking at somewhere around 20 to 30 full-sized, plot driven planets where you're going to have to explore around.

IGN AU: How much do these vary in size? When compared with the worlds in Knights of the Old Republic, for instance.

Chris Priestly:
There'd be a few that are about the same size as Kashyyyk or Taris - something along those lines. Some are larger - which is why we give you a vehicle this time to get around, because if we made you walk around, it would be a whole lot of walking. Even with the vehicle, if you were going end to end, on some planets it would take five minutes just to get to get to where you're going and five minutes to get back if you didn't bother stopping to do any of the plots along the way.

IGN AU: Morality steers the story in a big way. However, it's been said that this morality is actually persistent throughout the trilogy. If you have two morally opposite endings, how will it reconnect in the sequel?

Chris Priestly:
I don't know a great deal about the second or third parts of the game yet. I know the lead writer and the writer of the Mass Effect novel have a bunch of ideas in terms of how the first one ends and how it will have ramifications on the second and eventually the third. I really don't want to say too much because I don't want to give anyone the wrong idea… what you do in the first game will definitely have and effect on what happens in the second and the third.

IGN AU: This question relates to that, too. Is it possible to be completely evil in the first game but totally good in the second?

Chris Priestly:
I think throughout the whole game, certainly in the first one, you get to make the moral choice. Again, I don't know exactly where we're going to take the second and third games yet; I would assume, based on what you can do in the first game, that you'll have that freedom in the second and third ones as well.

IGN AU: When can we expect to see the first DLC content coming through?

Chris Priestly:
I know they're already working on the DLC content for Xbox Live - that sort of thing. I think, within a month [of release] I think is a good estimation. I certainly would hope it's out in time for Christmas; it's certainly not set yet. It's all up in the air, depending on how well the game sells and all that good stuff. I would think that, by 2008, we would have at least one or two things up.

IGN AU: Will people who get onboard with part two or three be at a disadvantage, skills and equipment-wise? Conversely, will skills and items be persistent?

Chris Priestly:
There would be no way that we would deliberately penalise a player like that. It would just be too unfair [to remove their gear]. Exactly how it'll work I'm not too sure yet, but you will not be penalise for not playing the first one.

IGN AU: 'Ambitious' is a term that gets bandied around a lot in games these days and Mass Effect gets labelled this quite a lot. Is the team satisfied that they've achieved everything they wanted to with Mass Effect?

Chris Priestly:
I think so - I mean, I'm not in direct contact with the team all the time and all the leads are extraordinarily busy finishing the game, finally getting it gold and getting it out the door. But the team meetings I attend and actually playing through the game itself, it does actually achieve what it intended. In fact, I think it probably exceeds it, just because it was our first game on the Xbox 360, it was our first game with the Unreal Engine, we didn't know exactly how much we could put into it, how much space on one disc, two discs - whatever was going to be needed to make the game great. I know they're really proud of what they've achieved.

IGN AU: How much is really left to be discovered? Do you think fans who have been following from day-one will get the same impact as someone who's going into Mass Effect nice and fresh?

Chris Priestly:
Yeah, oh god yeah.

IGN AU: How much of the game do you think has been seen publicly?

Chris Priestly:
Five percent! [laughs] At best. You're looking at a game that, depending on how you play, how rapidly you progress through the story, how quickly you pick up combat and skip dialogue and so on, it'll take 20 hours. But then there are those people that play, like me, who want to do a romance plot, do party NPC plots, who get sidetracked with sub quests and such - then you're looking at maybe 60 hours at least. Again, it depends on your individual play style.

Knowing the video so far that have been released, and the screens, there's just so, so much that hasn't been seen before. There are a lot of surprises still there.

IGN AU: Is there still a sense of resolution at the end, even though there are two more games coming?

Chris Priestly:
It's conclusive to the point that, if you enjoyed the game but never wanted to play another Mass Effect game again, you would've been totally satisfied with the experience. You're not going to be left hanging at the end of Mass Effect one. It's a self-contained story by itself, but there are definitely ways - and people will say 'oh! I see how they can do a second one!' That sort of thing.

IGN AU: Is there a tentative release timeplan for parts two and three at this stage?

Chris Priestly:
Not that I know of; certainly at this stage they've done the first one and when it's out in stores, the team is going to take a well-deserved vacation and get their energy back. I know that some of them are already working on the Xbox Live content - certainly the lead artists, designers and programmers have already started thinking about where they're going to go and all that sort of thing.

They will be working on it essentially immediately; it's not something that's going to take years before we start working on the sequel and then years for the next one to come out. The preliminary work is underway - the preliminary work was in place when we started one because we had a general overriding idea of where we wanted to go, which is why we announced it as a trilogy at the start. I would think within a couple of years you'll be seeing the second one.

IGN AU: Is Shephard coming back?

Chris Priestly:
Hmmm… could beeee! [laughs] How's that for vague? Could be! We'll see what the writing team comes up with for that.

IGN AU: Bioware has a near-religious fanbase. Have they had any influence on the direction of the game through forums, fansites, feedback or other words beginning with F?

Chris Priestly:
Yeah, they really have. My job actually was created to deal with that. I was in QA at Bioware for over five years, and Bioware started to realise that it's not just the fans playing the game - we need feedback from them. That created my position as Community Coordinator, to sort act as a go-between. If fans say, 'you know what I really like? I like facial customisation' for instance.

IGN AU: Are there any cool in-jokes or easter eggs we should keep an eye out for?

Chris Priestly:
There are definitely some things in there. Without giving away any major plot points, there's a really good one that I laughed out loud at. When you defeat a certain enemy in battle and a holographic AI popped up and it started giving this explanation when you were expecting to continue the mission and Shephard looks at it and goes 'oh great; another pop up!' [laughs]

There are little things like that - little bits of light humour. You know, Mass Effect is a darker, more mature game for us; I think in order to appreciate how occasionally dark and gritty it is, you get these contrasting elements of humour in the game. There are little secret things hidden here and there…

IGN AU: Like what?

Chris Priestly:
Nope! Nope! Not going there!

IGN AU: You old dog. Fine. For god sakes, give us Baldur's Gate III! What would it take to make this game happen? We'll do it. Name your price.

Chris Priestly:
I would like to see it - I really would. I'd love to see it; I know there's all kinds of 'who owns what IPs' - Infogrames, Atari, Wizards of the Coast and everything that went in there. So many fans have great memories of Baldur's Gate, including myself and most of everybody at Bioware. It would be great -it's not something that's on our slate currently, but you never know what we're going to get up to next.

IGN AU: That makes me cry. Alright - five more years, when Mass Effect is out of the way - I expect to be holding a copy in my hands.

Chris Priestly:
Possibly! You never know!

IGN AU: Thanks!

Chris Priestly:
Oh no problem.
 
Argh, can't wait for this game. Having this and Metal Gear Solid 4 within a few months of each other shouldn't be allowed!
 
I know there is a lot of hype around this game and I have been watching some trailers trying to get into it. I realize it will be somewhat like Oblivion where you have to talk to people to continue through the game. Usually that just bores me and I only played about 10 hours of Oblivion before I got bored. I like games with a lot of action and dont want to read a dialog the entire time to progress through a game. Is Mass Effect going to be consumed with dialog reading?? Since I dont know anything about this game will I have to buy a strategy guide to be able to enjoy it or are most things fairly easy to figure out? I dont want to get the game if I am going to need a strat guide to complete it. I am trying to keep an open mind as much as possible to understand this game. My girlfriend wants to buy it for me but I told her I am not sure if I want it yet. What are some of the really cool features that set this game apart from the rest? I realize its only single player so what is in Mass Effect to keep the replay value high? I guess basically I want to know all the highlights of this game to get me excited or what has you most excited about this game? [:)]
 
Played the first mission last night, GREAT so far! Anyone else pick it up?
 
IGN gave it a 9.4 so I'm guessing it's pretty good, I'm thinking about getting tomorrow after work.
 

Latest Posts

Back