Maybe tuners can explain this to me...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zenith
  • 63 comments
  • 3,724 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread is dumb enough to actually make me post in it.

You've all completely ignored what his true question is.

If you're looking to buy a project car. To start from scratch. What would you buy in a junkyard for $1000 or less.

Why would you ever buy an RX7, or a Civic, or anything that has relatively low dollar per anygivenmesurementyouwant.

The total required cost to build a car you can hardpark and be proud of, is not something that can just be represented by a dollar value. The amount of time it takes to build a car is absurd. The amount of dedication you must have to this vehicle is astronomical.

It best be something you like. It best be something that can actually perform to what you want it to do. It best be something that is realistically affordable to finish.

The way you guys talk is absurd. He's not asking why kids modify their Civic their parents gave them. He's asking about BUILDING a REAL CAR.
The fact that none of you have ever actually done this, you will never, ever find this out.

So keep bench racing.

Maybe one day reality will hit you and you'll realize there's only one car that can be made into anything, do everything better than everything else, and still cost less than $10,000.
 
Sadly he's right. :lol:

Although around here it's getting to be cheaper to build a V8 RX-7 than to buy a Fox or 3rd Gen.
 
So, 10k more miles is a huge difference? The FD is a time bomb and anyone who has actually owned one will attest to that. It also demands a large premium despite being aged.

So you get a turbo FC for 5 grand. Its still a full second slower in a drag race and it handles worse. With a less reliable motor. And the one that ran a 9.64 has how many dollars of work into it?

And using a fan forum for the RX-7 to provide "proof" is on par with using FOX NEWS to provide proof that Obama is a Communist.
Since you want to be a smart 🤬 Fastest rotary in the world.
Second fastest 13b in the world. Usa fastest rotary.
another fast 13b. Fastest car in the world to have a 3/4 chassis. Fastest starlet in the world fastest 12a
 
And how much do those cost to build?

You've proved absolutely nothing besides your ablilty to paste YouTube videos with no formatting in your post.
 
Sadly he's right. :lol:

Although around here it's getting to be cheaper to build a V8 RX-7 than to buy a Fox or 3rd Gen.

RX7's still pull a fairly hefty premium for a clean shell around here.

I'd say a clean FC, even with blown seals, is around $2000. Figure, $2000 for the FC + $3000 for the Renegade LS1 kit + $4000 for a functional LS1+T56 combo and assorted mods because why, oh why, would you ever leave it stock with it out of the car. (You wouldn't. Now's the time for H/C/I)

You're at $9000 without even touching the suspension/brakes/etc. This is assuming you're doing most, if not all, the work yourself. Which, if you're even planning this, it is assumed you are.
You would, at this point, have a car that would easily run 11's all day though, and could get you to work and home. Handle like poop and stop like poop, sure.

Since prices for everything vary according to which way the wind is blowing none of this is concrete. But, it's accurate.
 
To put it bluntly, money. Yes, if you look at it from outside the car owners point of view, you COULD get a car a lot better than a modified whatever for the amount invested in it. But, it's never a case of "sweet, I just got a $5k car, now to dump 15k in it." That never happens. It's (almost 100% of the time) a case of having a car, and then spending money on upgrades as you have the money to improve it a little bit at a time. You do that for 3-5 years, and tally up what you've spent, and have a small seizure.

I've got a friend who has a 323 GTX, he's owned it for about 5 ish years. He has more money in it than I have in the Evo, and his car is worth about 3 grand if he wants to sell it. However, because he has spent so much money on it already, he's just going to keep going with modifying it, making it better as he can.

If most 'tuners' had 20k to spend on a car straight off, the vast majority would buy a 20k car. The 'import' guys tend to be younger, and I believe it is promarily because of they simply can't afford to get straight into something 'nice' straight away.
 
Mafia boy, your argument completely falls on its face if you look at the Corvette.

And I mean completely.

The ZR-1 & ACR Viper were my only exceptions but I left it out of that post because we aren't talking about the new school. And even at 1350-1400kg even the old school vettes weren't producing 600hp unless they were insanely worked (like the L88 spec motors). But they were the lightweights of the group. Look at the Pontiac GTO, Challengers and such, all weighed quite a bit more than that Vette!

Also, :lol: at Rotaries, considering an LS1 weighs less than the twin-turbo 13B setup in the FD3S and makes more power.

That's because of all the piping, put a big single turbo on that 13B and it changes the game a fair bit. Besides, I don't see many LS1's producing that power WITHOUT some form of forced induction either. We produce 600-700hp rotaries in Australia on most days thanks to our wonderful scene out here that are fully streetable.

Putting an SR20DET into a 510 is a bit more than some bolting in...

Actually no it doesn't. You get the crossmembers and mounts from an S13/14/15 and it will bolt in without too many troubles, I've seen this for myself, just a couple of extra drilled holes to mount it up properly.

Most Japanese compacts from the 90's, such as the Silvia series, weigh around 1200 kg, not 800. A Corvette weighs under 1400kg.
Ahh, but I said an Escort & Gemini which ARE from the 1970's and 1980's which ARE around the 800-900kg range. The S13 is only a tad over 1100kg, it's the S14 & S15 that get porky at the 1250kg mark. Don't think I'm sticking with the F&F crowd on this, there are craploads of small cars here that actually weigh that little, from 510 Datsuns (and their little brothers, the 1200, 1000 & 120Y), to KE20 Corollas, Gemini's, Escorts, Lancers (no, not Evo's, the OLD SCHOOL Lancers!) and the RX series (RX3 = 850kg, R100 even less!). And since you went with the 90's.....I actually owned a Mazda 121 bubble....guess what that weighed?? 805kg!! So not all 90's Japanese cars are porkers. With a BPT motor fitted, I was looking at a stock 200hp in a sub 900kg car and with slight mods would've been looking at 300hp quite comfortably.....makes me wish the car was never slammed into and written off by a drunk driver. Think about it, a car that produced as much power as the DC2R but weighed 150kg less than the DC2R with 2/3 more torque....would've been good on the sprint times considering the DC2R does low to mid 14's stock standard.

Making over 300 HP reliably on any 2 liter turbo motor requires a fair investment.

No it doesn't. EJ20 STi = 300hp STOCK. 4G63 = 300hp STOCK. SR20VET = 300hp STOCK. Later 3S-GTE's produce 210-250hp stock and only needs a small boost rise to 300hp, SR20DET is 250hp stock and only needs an exhaust and small boost rise to make 300hp, and a lot of people actually get 400hp out of them quite reliably without a turbo change, just improving the fuel flow was their major hurdle. The Mazda BPD (1.8L turbo) produces 210hp stock, boost/exhaust & FMIC get it to 300hp easily, FJ20DET requires a small boost rise, FMIC and exhaust for 300hp, Cosworth 2 Litre requires similar small mods for it. You have to realise that most of these motors are built to handle higher amounts of boost thanks to factory forged pistons, strong conrods and a strong bottom end and most have a history dating back to the early to late 80's when F1 & WRC technology was filtering down into their road cars (such as the Nissan FJ15 F1 motor becoming the FJ20 after detuning it for street use, but still shares a fair bit of the technology developed from that F1 motor).

Older compacts, such as the AE86, have solid rear axles which is exactly what makes Mustangs handle less than ideally, so yeah...
But you didn't take the weight into account. It's still a lot better pushing 900kg vs 1500kg and makes life easier on the Live Rear Axles, plus they have limited slip diffs which helps compared to an open diff Muzzy.

Power to displacement is one of the biggest ricer arguments ever. Making power out of a LS series engine is insanely easy, and far more reliable than making equivalent power out of just about anything from Japan aside from maybe a 2JZ and an RB series motor, and even then you have turbo lag. Producing 300HP out a B18C without a turbo requires some serious work, and they don't handle boost the best. The H22 is a much better choice and thats mostly because of its lower compression and larger displacement.

Just because I talk about power to displacement I'm a ricer?? :grumpy: Allow me to retort.

I was producing OVER 280hp from a STOCK 1JZ-GTE in my MX83 Cressida.....that's factory numbers because my 1JZ was from a JZA70 Supra which has a bit more power than the JZZ20-30 Soarer's, and that's without my FMIC and 3" exhaust. Plus, I never said that the B18C had to be mildly worked, there are some crazy DC2R's going around here with around 300hp naturally aspirated thanks to Honda mechanic's here being tied in with companies like TODA and JUN. The H22A isn't the best choice at all times, even with it's bigger displacement as more people find it better to use the B20 block/B18 head combination.

Even my old Gemini (which was powered by a crappy Isuzu G161 motor) produced 176hp after a lot of mods (stock was 60hp) such as a 40/80 camshaft, forged Arias pistons (domed), Carillo conrods, Peter Jackson Racing crankshaft, rejetted G200 carby and such, but because of the light weight (we stripped her down to under 800kg) and driveline improvements (fitting a good brass button clutch and lightened flywheel and better yokes), we were able to get the car to a best of 13.81@96mph in 1995. Even after all that work, the total cost was less than buying a 302ci crate motor. If you compare that to cars of that era, we were running alongside Porsche Carrera's and beating Mazda RX7's, not to mention whooping everything from the HSV brochure which were running up to 5.7L blueprinted motors!! We then did a milder tune with a Isuzu G180 which we put in another Gemini we owned using a 25/65 cam, Arias pistons and a 40mm IDF weber, but hooked up a 100hp 'dry' nitrous kit and produced 245hp on the bottle. Because that was a cruiser, we were using an unmodified auto transmission which affected 60ft. times (try 2.4's for 60ft!, that's how slow) we were still able to get that car to run 13.54@104mph. Once again, those times walked over any factory V8 in this country at that time.

But like I said, the bottom line is what makes us do it, because we love our small cars!!
 
There are a number of reasons. One of the biggest reasons is based on impatience. Parents buy their kids a Civic/Corolla etc. or something for their first car, or someone buys one of those cars because they can't afford something nice. Without any means to get something worth modding in the near future, they are too eager to either join the big boys or start doing something with their hobby, so they simply roll with what they have. As they grow more attached to/used to their beater car, and/or the community by meeting others with the car, or frequenting a model-specific forum, they want to stick with it. This leads them to stick with this particular car that they know and love, which keeps them fighting in the uphill battle that is modding a FWD economy car.

Also, a factor that comes into play is being a sheep to marketing. If there's a part out there for their car, they think that it's the logical next step or goal for their mod path. I can't count how many people I've met with not even Civics, but **** like Camrys, 4cylinder Benz's, small Japanese pickup trucks, Geos, Tercels, Cavaliers, 626s, etc. etc. that have bought a couple of eBay/Vatozone bolt-on ricer parts for their car, and are so eager to tell everyone they're planning on a turbo kit, and start naming off all this **** "in the near future" that is going to cost more than the car. It's simply myopic that they feel they have to keep improving their grocery getter piece by piece instead of aiming for something desirable.

Also, to someone who mentioned the old Corollas, I have two AE86s, and they aren't mod worthy at all in my eyes. GREAT daily driver, very fun and nimble, but they DON'T handle well and their engines are soooooo down on power it's pathetic. a 1.6L that's 25 years old is not a great starting platform, period.

Also, for whoever said muscle cars cost big money to mod......you couldn't be more wrong, simple as that. The Chevy 350 is the original cheap speed, and the fox body Mustang is the all time best bang-for-the-buck drag car. I would put this car against anything else for the cheapest way to run 11s, 10s, 9s, etc...
 
the fox body Mustang is the all time best bang-for-the-buck drag car. I would put this car against anything else for the cheapest way to run 11s, 10s, 9s, etc...

Why stop there. Why say "oh, I have a Foxbody, it's a drag car"

Can just as easily throw coilovers/panhard bar/swaybar etc. on it and have a car that can turn, and turn so well that everyone's argument about "American cars can't turn" becomes straight admittance of ignorance on their part.
And it's STILL realistically affordable. (Maximum Motorsports Road & Track box, $2500. This will be going on my car. In the magical land of me having more money I'd rather get the Maximum Grip box since of course, it's got more cool stuff. $4500)

Everything else you said is true.
 
Last edited:
I had a 62 nova, small block, all that crap. It just wasn't near involved. It's much more fun to tune a computer than turn a screw to adjust a carb....Plus, i have more respect for someone who can get 1000hp from a 2 liter engine than I do for a person who gets 1000hp from a 9 liter engine simply because it's more of a challenge...Just my 2 cents:tup:
 
A lot of stuff that I read

I did read it.

You've mentioned a ton of cars that we never had in the US, ever, such as the 131 and so on. Further, I was quoting US market weights, which are higher due to the stricter crash standards we have and safety requirements. Even more so, I don't see a whole lot of tuners working with cars much older than the late 80's, and especially not younger people.

600 HP rotaries exist, yes, but how long do they last? The current LS7 makes 500 HP stock, and getting another 100 out of it isn't taxing on the engine.

As for the SR20 into the 510, what do you do about the drivetrain?

And I may have been mistaken about the 300HP quote on the 2 liters, but producing much more beyond that does require some work to maintain reliability. An LS series motor will 400 HP till the world ends with no problems.

And did you just suggest turbo'ing a B20Vtec? I drove an NA B20Vtec around for a while, it was not really impressive compared to the BMW motors I've dealt with.

Honestly, there is no replacement for displacement, at all. Turbo systems emulate additional displacement, but they have weight, heat, and latency issues. The Rotory is quite cool on paper, but in the real world is just has far far too many problems. Sure, 3 moving parts but they don't out last the worst of piston engines, poor economy (thus low efficiency), emissions (another low efficiency bit) and you have to rev the hell out of them to get any real power. Unless you turbo them, but we all know how that ends.

In short, Troux is spot on about all this. I may have been arguing for the M3, because in you are looking at mild mods, its a very good car for the money, more so when compared to JapanLand stuff. However, the Fox Body Mustang is just absurd in the performance per dollar category.
 
Have to add this since I saw it!

Fastest rotary in the world.


WRONG!! WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRRRRROOOOONNNNGGG!!!



THAT'S the fastest rotary in the world mazdaman, not your Puerto Rican cars, they've even done 210mph recently. :sly:
 
To me, the whole tuning/ricing community all started when the movie The Fast and the Furious came out. Since then, every High School parking lot America has been filled with high miliage Honda Civics with mis colored body kits and fart canons.

Are you kidding me, Gran Turismo 1 put tuning on the map. F&F made money on the trend.
 
What Troux said.

You start with something. You live with it for a while. Start to have fun, and want more. Start working on the car, get involved with the enthusiast community. Keep working on it, you're getting dedicated to it now. You know what you've got, you know everything you've put into it and all the time you've spent under it.

You get to a certain point where it just becomes impractical to sell and start again.

That said, I can't understand some of the cars people start with.

I've got a DSM. Turbo, AWD, huge support base, plenty of parts. Engine is over-built from stock and responds well to tuning. I drove it for two years before I got interested in making it faster. I've wanted to push it into the ocean a few times, but with the time (lots) and budget (tight) I've spent on this car... Well, I'm attached.

It still needs work. Lots of it. But I'm getting there, slowly...
 
And why is that?
Like you have to ask why.
Why do you take a car that was simply meant to be cheap and reliable, and try to make it faster? I can fully understand people upping the power on their M3's, but why would you do that to something like a Civic or a Corolla? It won't go very fast in the end, and you could have saved your money for a quicker car in the first place.
Not if you manage your money right.

This Civic runs just over 300whp & cost less than $10,000 to build, car included.
Russyo_1.jpg


The amount of cars, import & domestic, that this thing has run is quite long.
 
I did read it.

Honestly, there is no replacement for displacement, at all. Turbo systems emulate additional displacement, but they have weight, heat, and latency issues. The Rotary is quite cool on paper, but in the real world is just has far far too many problems. Sure, 3 moving parts but they don't out last the worst of piston engines, poor economy (thus low efficiency), emissions (another low efficiency bit) and you have to rev the hell out of them to get any real power. Unless you turbo them, but we all know how that ends.

My N/A 13b is just fine at 116,000 miles. Runs great. And I didn't know "revving the hell" out of an engine was in the 5-7 rpm range...Sounds pretty normal to me. My gas milage is 16 in the city and 24 hwy...and my Buick gets about the same just plus 4 on the Hwy for gearing im sure. Honestly Ive had more issues with my motorcycle engine(not a great example but still) then I ever have had with the 7.

As per the OP's original question. I think it gives people something to DO with their cars. Among other things.
 
This seems like a ridiculously simple question to answer, yet it seems to take so much explanation.

Just a disclaimer: I'm going to be a little vague here, but only because I'm trying to cover a huge passion with as little words as possible... but "as little words as possible" is still a lot, so bear with me.

Zenith, there are a number of factors--almost too many to count. But it boils down to this main point: accessibility, which is the combination of widespread availability and relatively low cost. Combined, those provide for the biggest motivational factor: a huge aftermarket.

If what you're offering were the rule--that no car should be "forced" to go fast unless that's exactly what the car was designed for in the first place--we'd never have come to the point we're currently at to begin with. The fact of the matter is that not everyone has the means to buy a Porsche 911 GT3 RS off the showroom floor, nor did that GT3 RS simply appear from thin air. There is a legacy of "forcing" things to go faster than they should, correcting mistakes, and building a better product from what was learned. Every car on the road has benefited from this legacy. Even "econoboxes" like the Civic. Those "econoboxes" can be found at any local sales lot for dirt cheap, and when compared to their ancestry mere decades prior, they have the advanced suspension and drivetrain technology to make them appealing to someone looking for an affordable means to go faster and faster.

Basically the gist of it is this: affordable and upgradeable performance is well within reach of anyone, whereas the utmost in factory performance is reserved for the folks who want to pay for bragging rights and aesthetic elitism. "Tuners" are looking to get the most out of the least investment--they're trying to maximize the minimal, and in doing so they want to prove that incredible things can be done with modest origins.

So let's say a car has a 4 cylinder engine with a factory-designed focus on efficiency, and let's say that car is called a Civic. Then several people and companies come along and say, "That's great, but let's ramp up the compression ratio and push this drivetrain to its limits and refine the handling so that it's competitive with the factory-built monsters out there, therefore providing people on a budget with a car that does everything the high-dollar cars do for much less money."

The original manufacturer of said car takes notice and releases a car which fulfills those needs right off the showroom floor, and they call it the Civic Si.

Then those same people build upon the Civic Si to make it even better.

And it keeps going and going.

"Tuners" are just the pioneers of the aftermarket, pushing the manufacturers to keep advancing. It doesn't matter at all what the car begins its life as, what matters is what that blank canvas can do and how far it can be pushed. There will always be the guy who can't afford that amazing factory-built machine that matches every standard currently set, and that same guy will always desire more from the car he can afford, and that's why those cars will continue to be pushed and improved. It's the same reason the greatest current right-off-the-showroom cars exist--the pursuit of efficient performance. You better believe the first 911 wasn't an *incredibly* awesome car--the people who bought one and improved it made Porsche release a better product, and the cycle continued, and it continues to this day.

People just want to be happy with what they can afford to be happy with. They want to make the most of what they can get.




If you don't buy my explanation, go ahead and ask Carroll Shelby why he put a Ford V8 in an AC Ace.
 
Why can't all you guys just grasp the concept that people love modified cars whether It's a 1000cc Mini or a Dodge viper.
You modify what ever you can get your hands on depending on where you live.
Modify cars will never die no matter what It Is.

EDIT: Even car manufacturer's do this themselves uping the power and facelifting previous models.
 
Have to add this since I saw it!



WRONG!! WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRRRRROOOOONNNNGGG!!!



THAT'S the fastest rotary in the world mazdaman, not your Puerto Rican cars, they've even done 210mph recently. :sly:


No mate your wrong the record is 6.74 check the rx7club forum there was a big problem about it because Flaco only has a timeslip. With no video,however I'd love to send you a link to the convo. Also may I add pac ran 209 .xx faster than Flaco all they have is the mph record. Most of those cars are from the U.S not P.R.
 
Why can't all you guys just grasp the concept that people love modified cars whether It's a 1000cc Mini or a Dodge viper.
You modify what ever you can get your hands on depending on where you live.
Modify cars will never die no matter what It Is.

EDIT: Even car manufacturer's do this themselves uping the power and facelifting previous models.

That was a point that I'd glazed over in my earlier post. Modifying cars is fun, but too many people are too eager to get started in the game that they overlook the worthiness of starting with a good platform. Maybe you can make a Mini twice as fast as it was stock for under $10K, but you still quickly get to a point where you could have put the money towards a platform that's just going to have more potential.

The key is a sense of self-awareness with your car. If you want to improve your Civic, go for it, but all you'll end up with is a better Civic, so don't feel entitled to any amount of respect just because you beat a car that was more expensive or faster when new. If you have your own reasons, modify whatever the hell you want, but don't sell yourself short by pretending you saved money on a Ferrari by bolting on $20K worth of parts to your beater Honda. This is why you see diminishing returns in a car's resale value as it's modified further. You can pick up Ferrari 360s and even a few Gallardos for the price I've seen some of the world's most extensively-modified Supras listed at.

So based on this, there's pretty much always going to be something better out there that you could have started with if you had the money, and a car that's simply going to be more expensive for a good reason. What's the solution to always seeing greener grass elsewhere? Don't take your car too seriously. Know your car's limitations, know why it isn't the car that you see on posters in kids' rooms or selected for DTM/Super GT/WC/GT races. Don't get swept up in the underdog valor that makes so many Honda owners think they have something to prove.

MistaX
Why stop there. Why say "oh, I have a Foxbody, it's a drag car"

Can just as easily throw coilovers/panhard bar/swaybar etc. on it and have a car that can turn, and turn so well that everyone's argument about "American cars can't turn" becomes straight admittance of ignorance on their part.
Now you're approaching diminishing returns by making the car do something it wasn't designed for in the first place. The Mustang was made to go fast in a straight line (only in recent years has handling really been a major directive). It's THE muscle car, and you've got to understand that making it handle well is going to be a task. I've seen PLENTY of road race/autocross Fox bodies, but the fact that you have to put on a full kit (albeit still insanely cheap) to get it to prove your point should tell you something.

Much like the AE86, the Fox body wasn't tuned to handle very well, the suspension is far from ideal, and the chassis isn't properly built for the kinds of loads that road racing would subject it to, but at the end of the day, it's still a light weight, RWD car, and that is a good enough start for a racing platform for most. Unlike the AE86, however, it comes with one of the world's most mod-happy motors. :) As I mentioned before, I have 2 AE86s, and they don't handle well because hardly any work was put into making them handle well. However, they handle exactly as good as a 2200lb RWD car on a solid axle should handle, and that's enough to have fun with. That being said, I've never really had any interest in modding them, just not worth it to me.
 
Last edited:
Because I can.

This times a million!

Compact economy cars are a good place to start, they are cheap, there's a million parts out there, they are decent cars in terms of chassis, and they are fairly straight forward to work on. This is why someone would start with a basic Civic and start to make it fast.

I could ask the same question about any car though, honestly I don't understand the appeal of taking a car from the 60's and building it into a race car. I don't understand why someone would take a new Camaro and put an exhaust on it so it's unholy loud. However, I do understand everyone has their own preferences in what they do to their car. As long as you aren't out there stealing the crap you put on your car or making it dangerous to be around I don't want what you do.
 
Why do you take a car that was simply meant to be cheap and reliable, and try to make it faster?

You don't.

Considering how good performance you can get for a small price it's cheaper to buy a car with a decent power output and handling stock than it is to modify an econobox.

As for why people do modify their cars? Because they want them to be unique. To have a "personality" that matches the owners' tastes.
 
People do what they like. I don't understand why people are arguing.

Some people like Japanese cars others don't. Some people like American cars and other people hate them. Same with anything else. People do what they enjoy doing and if they enjoy working on Japanese cars I don't see what it wrong with that.

Like I said I don't understand why people are arguing with opinions.
 
This times a million!
I was going to post the same thing actually, and he beat me to it.

"Because we can" is pretty much what it comes down to. I can put 5k into my car, and have something I can climb into EVERY DAY, have a blast wherever I go, get 35mpg, and then drive it home at the end of the day. When the weekend comes around, I drive it to the track (road course), 🤬 on 20k cars all day, then drive it home at the end of the day.

If I wreck it at the track, I get on craigslist and buy a $500k shell, fix it, and go on with my life.

I really don't care if it doesn't 11's at the track, I'd rather have fun the 99% of the time I'm driving it elsewhere than build a car that is fun to drive for 10 seconds at a time and putt around everywhere else because it doesn't stop or turn or get anywhere without filling up 5 times along the way.

If your reason to disregard this is the car's "original purpose" then so be it. I'll stick to my grocery getter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Posts

Back