- 33,155
- Hammerhead Garage
It seems that half of Formula 1 these days is getting the competition's parts banned while getting yours deemed legal. The single diffusers in 2011 can't come soone enough.^ not again...![]()
It seems that half of Formula 1 these days is getting the competition's parts banned while getting yours deemed legal. The single diffusers in 2011 can't come soone enough.^ not again...![]()
The exhausts on the McLaren are really far back compared to most of the others...
I wonder if this is to do with the exhaust - or whether they've found something there...
C.
They have as it turns out - http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2010/0/720.html
Looks like a good idea...
Very very interesting...
So the exhausts being further back means that the car gets less drag at higher speeds?! - Therefore should be quicker on the straights... especially when following people?!
C.
http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/03/bahr...e-could-return/James AllenIt is emerging that the cleverest thing about this wing is actually something very simple; the airflow from an opening in the cockpit to the slot in the back of the rear wing, is carried down a pipe in the sharkfin engine cover, but it needs to be “switched on” on the straights. To have any kind of mechanical device would be illegal. The solution? It is controlled by the driver’s body. When he moves his left leg in a certain way, it allows air flow through, which shoots into the slot on the back of the wing and separates the airflow underneath the wing, causing it to shed drag, so the car goes faster down the straight. It’s a bit like the brake steer third pedal McLaren had in 1997, but even more simple.
GuizotiaThe opposite idea is that the air flow comes out of the slot at lower speed, along the wing surface. This would help to keep the air flow attached on a wing that is threatening to stall (i.e. steep). The benefit would be that you could run a higher downforce wing that works because of the air blowing from the slot, keeping the air flow attached to the back of the wing, but at high speeds turn off the air flow, allowing the wing to naturally stall.
This idea seems inherently dangerous because if the device fails the car suddenly loses downforce at the times when it is most needed. If this were possible the device would be banned instantly under safety grounds.
Very very interesting...
So the exhausts being further back means that the car gets less drag at higher speeds?! - Therefore should be quicker on the straights... especially when following people?!
C.
No, the idea works by manipulating the cool and hot air to stall the rear wing, which effectively loses drag and helps top speed.
This solution is all about running in clean air.
Yes, moving the exhausts further back has helped cause less drag, but combined with the cooler air being channeled with it. Its not just the exhausts.