Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X to Come to the US First

  • Thread starter Thread starter YSSMAN
  • 49 comments
  • 2,320 views
Wow, that's cool news! Hope they're bringing it to Canada.
 
Any word on the streetlegality of the X in Canada? I've seen a couple XIIIs on the roads here, some from the States and one from a local dealer who is only supposed to be tracking it.
 
Well the problem is, Mitsubishi has to be willing to spend money to make money, and unfortunately given their current position in the market, they have to "play it safe." While I was without the internet I attempted to figure out a plan for Mitsubishi, and a rough recall of what I had decided looked similar to this:

- Cut the Endeavor and Raider. Limit SUV sales to the Outlander (Lancer-based) and the Montero (still a world-class-SUV), albeit with very limited production numbers in order to cut costs and lower the risk on slow-selling SUVs.

- Limit the Gallant to two trims, one baisic 4-cyl model and one "sporty" V6 model. Think Nissan Maxima and the SL/SE trims here. Building what people want is the big idea, so Mitsubishi needs to turn away from chasing Toyota and Honda and instead focus on Nissan as the main competition. Also, they need to consider the rebirth of the Gallant VR-4, baisically the Gallant running modern Evolution bits and pieces.

- Limit the Lancer to three trim levels, ala Subaru and the Impreza. One economy 4cyl, a variable-geometry turbo AWD "tweener," and the all-out Evolution. AWD on baisic models should be an option as well, as if they can sell the cars for cheaper than the Subaru competition, it only brings more bragging rights to Mitsubishi.

- Bring the "i" to the United States NOW! Why wait for the microcar fad to happen when you can start it for yourself? The smart ForTwo is still more than a year away, so why not get the "i" certified and sell it here?
 
The "i" is a size below, I believe... but the Colt would fit.

Of course, it's a crowded market, and I'm not sure how close to the state-of-the-art the current Colt is.
 
Microcar FAD? Anyhow, my only concern with the "i" is if it can actually be useful for daily driving. Now I read the latest edition of Popular Science magazine. The engine is in the middle. So this is likely the first Kei car to have a midship configuration since the Honda Z Turbo (1998 or so) and the first mid/RWD Kei cars since the Honda and Mugen Beat models. That's right- the "i" is (is that grammatically correct for this car?) a rear-wheel drive car. I don't have the i in GT4, so I don't know about this car's capabilities too much. All I know is that the car should be a wonderful handling car with the mid/RWD configuration. It should be a controllable mid-engined car since it isn't seriously powerful. So you know, YSSMAN, I'm going to have to imagine how the i will do in the States. The Fit's/City's/Jazz's doing good. The BMW Mini has done pretty well the past few years. So why not Mitsu? It's a quirky little car that seats four people. If all of this does go through, it may be one of the first small cars available in America to have either a mid/RWD or RWD configuration. Whether or not it means first-ever or first in a long time is something I don't know. I think a difference in drivetrain would fuel SOME interest for it. People love different, right? So why not the i?

By the way, Mitsubishi will have to think of another name so that you don't make as many grammatical errors in talking about the i. Damn it! Going to have to retake English 1301...
 
Well thats the thing... They allready have a great car ready, so why not sell it? They have been testing it in California for about a year now, many of the magazines getting to drive it, but no word on production.

I say they sell it against the smart ForTwo on greater practicality and similar fuel economy with a "sensible" price. They can't afford to miss the boat...
 
Well thats the thing... They allready have a great car ready, so why not sell it? They have been testing it in California for about a year now, many of the magazines getting to drive it, but no word on production.

I say they sell it against the smart ForTwo on greater practicality and similar fuel economy with a "sensible" price. They can't afford to miss the boat...

I totally didn't think of things that way. With the current trend of gas prices, this would give them a halo car in an entirely different light.
 
According to Car and Driver, Mitsubishi is "thinking about it" but they aren't certain of anything. They are concerned about the overall performance of the car, but as long as it would be presumably faster than the ForTwo, they should be fine...
 
For those that do not know of the "i":

Autoweek
We’ve been marveling at this piece of automotive mechanical packaging since we first saw a concept version at last fall’s Toyko motor show (“Epic Story,” Oct. 31, 2005). As soon as the production car arrived on the Japanese market this year, we were pounding on Mitsubishi’s door for a test drive.

Spending a few days with the tiny city car around Tokyo’s busy streets is enough to appreciate a vehicle of this nature. The i’s 660-cc, 64-hp turbocharged three-cylinder engine might not sound like anything too exciting—and to be honest, it isn’t—but there is sufficient power to allow you to zip past traffic and propel you to more than adequate speed on the occasional express- way drive.

The exterior dimensions (134 inches long, 58 inches wide, on a 100-inch wheelbase) are what make the car a real joy. The trim size allows the i to squeeze into tiny holes in traffic and miniscule parking spaces that would be impossible for normal-sized cars.

bilde


The compact exterior dimensions don’t cramp the interior space, though. By placing the engine behind the rear seats, Mitsubishi freed up impressive levels of space. And thanks to the cocoon-like design, headroom is more than ample. The rear seats split 50/50 and fold flat to give you useful space for loading groceries; but keep those eggs away from the engine cover or they will be hard-boiled by the time you get home!

As with many small Japanese cars, the seating position is far too high, but the i’s driver’s seat is fitted with plenty of adjustments to allow for a comfortable position. The seat’s backrest is contoured for more compact frames, leading to pain as the actual inner frame of the seat digs into the back of a taller driver—a problem Mitsubishi will need to address if it decides to sell this city car outside Japan.

Equipment levels are impressive for an entry-level car. Our four-wheel-drive model (2wd is available) was packed with xenon headlights, air conditioning, power windows, twin airbags, keyless entry and a hard-disk-based navigation unit.

bilde


The i comes with a smooth-shifting four-speed automatic transmission; there is no manual. The electric power steering system might be compact and light, but it is lacking when it comes to overall steering feel. A light curb weight and low-profile tires lead to a less-than-refined ride, but the i handles city cornering with ease and contained body roll.

Mitsubishi says the 4wd i is good for 42.3 mpg, but the best we managed was a rather disappointing 29.4 mpg, proving how hard the tiny engine has to work despite the car’s 2116-pound curb weight.

The big question is whether the i will be considered for sale in the United States. We hear Mitsubishi has shipped two stateside for evaluation, and considering the ever-increasing gas prices, we can’t rule out the possibility of cars like the i on our roads—at least the urban ones—in the future.
 
29.4 for 4wd is promising, but considering its' weight at just over 2,100 lbs, it's kind of dissapointing. Even the realife mpg should be high 30's in the city, maybe even mid 40's on hwy.
 
Keep in mind they are running the car pretty hard, all magazines do. I'm sure you could easily run it north of 35 MPG without a problem. Although, it is quite confusing they don't have a model with a stick. Oh well, its not like every single one would have been sold with one to begin with...
 
The aforementioned "i" and the brand new Mitsubishi Outlander (which got outstanding first reviews from both C/D and MT, cant wait for a comparo against the V6 Rav4) are excellent cars showing Mitsubishi is definately not done making cars. This evo X will also demonstrate Mitsubishi's knowhow in making great cars and help bring in people to the showrooms to look at the outlander and i. Mitsubishi is on a roll and hopefully the next Lancer and Galant will be good enough to push Mitsubishi back into prosperity. Mostly hoping for that because then it might lead to the development of a brand new GTO :) .
 
I didn't know this car also comes in 4WD. I'm just so stuck on the GT4 model with a mid/RWD configuration. So maybe that's a little more incentive to maybe look into this car.

This thread is still about the Lancer Evolution X's American possibilities, but this i discussion has been a pretty nice one.
 
Yeah it could definitely be done, no sweat. And the costs of building it would be far outweighed by the profit made from the vehicle - I mean, the WRX outsells every other Impreza model combined.

Interesting sidenote: Mitsubishi built the turbocharger on my Volvo!

interesting sidenote: mitsubishi built the turbo on the WRX :dunce:
 
I think those Mitsubishi turbos are actually made by the MMC's(Mitsubishi Motors) parent company, Mitsubishi Heavy Industry. They are all part of Mitsubishi Group, and they have hand in many different type of business and industry.
 
Be that as it may, Mitsubishi built my ECU. :lol:
 
I apologize for even more off-topicness, but this one's pretty big. I had no idea. Nikon(pronounced nikon, like knee-kon) is a Mitsubishi. I just found this out on Wikipedia. Again, I had no idea!
 
I also found recently Mitsubishi made my starter motor.

Have been finding that three diamond star all over the place. :)
 
i hope it comes with the power of the FQ series (320, 340 and 400 bhp) as the FQ can do 0-60 mph in 3.5 seconds and 0-100 mph in 9 seconds
 
Back