And let's not forget... AWD/FWD/RWD doesn't really matter in the snow unless you have the proper shoes on...
I was going to mention the new AWD 3 series. Apparently BMW has made a good system here that is good in snow and if pretty safe. I am only going by word of mouth and a commercial I saw lol.
Also what about the new WRX. Puts out similar times to the sti and seems a little more civilized. Plus the Sedan version looks pretty nice, IMO alot better looking than the WRX hatchback. Go tell your dad to test one out and see how he likes it.
![]()
At 224 hp to the (all 4) wheels and a 5.5 second 0-60 its no slouch.
Actually, the 2009-2010 WRX is rated a 265hp, though some say it's actually ~280hp, and does 0-60 in 4.5s.
224ish to the wheels apparently.
I went to look at this one day at a local dealership. No, thank you Ford. I want the Performance PKG, but I don't know why I suddenly have to sacrifice a lot of interior comforts. And then there's the dealer slapping a premium price on it bumping 2 of them on their lot to $45K & $48,200.2011 Ford Taurus SHO (AWD) - 365 BHP 3.5L Twin-Turbo V6
![]()
Its arguably one of the best American cars sold on the market right now, even if its overall performance came up a bit short on expectations. But, frankly, the car is an absolute bullet. It will hold its own in the corners. Its as well-mannered as anything else, and no one will know what the hell it is until you've completely blown them away. Its not the sleeper's sleeper... But its awfully damn close. If I had the $40-ish grand to nab one, I most certainly would.
I went to look at this one day at a local dealership. No, thank you Ford. I want the Performance PKG, but I don't know why I suddenly have to sacrifice a lot of interior comforts. And then there's the dealer slapping a premium price on it bumping 2 of them on their lot to $45K & $48,200.
I'm sorry, but that's S4/335i money right there & that comes with the interior & performance options to match. Ford needs to keep their eyes on the dealer markups.
I went to look at this one day at a local dealership. No, thank you Ford. I want the Performance PKG, but I don't know why I suddenly have to sacrifice a lot of interior comforts. And then there's the dealer slapping a premium price on it bumping 2 of them on their lot to $45K & $48,200.
I'm sorry, but that's S4/335i money right there & that comes with the interior & performance options to match. Ford needs to keep their eyes on the dealer markups.
Just came back from the NY Auto Show with my father. Couple things. The Evo X seats were not terribly uncomfortable just not terribly pleasant. The leg side bolsters are quite large and kind of pinch the legs but otherwise they are fine. The 335xi is apparently a very strong option in both our opinions. We were told the car is a little more understeer prone and a tad heavier but overall is just as quick as the RWD 335i. But the big shocker was the Hyundai Sonata. WOW! For 19k that car is amazing. There is now a 25k 274hp model coming. The fit and finish was great as were the seats. About the only thing we did not like was the thin-ness of the plastics but hey it 19k. Although at 274hp torque steer becomes a problem and a used TL becomes competition.
On a side note my father, being the slick guy he is, convinced this bloke at the fancy car section to let him sit in the Lotus Evora. First things first the car is absolutely stunning. IMO the best looking car Lotus has ever made. But that aside, it is pointless. It is not a "luxury" or GT Lotus. It is an Elise with nice leather and nice styling. There is absolutely no utility for that car. You can't see anything out of the back due to the massive engine cover. To make things worse it has a rear camera but it only turns on when you are in reverse!?!?!? The rear haunches block a good portion of what you see in the side vision mirrors, which are way too close to the car. There is no glove compartment. And as stupid as it may sound no cup holder. The rear seats are useless and since they are actual seats putting stuff back there is awkward. And to top it all of they want 80k. HA! For that money I would take a GTR or a used Elise and tune the bonkers out it.
Can't say I agree. Rear visibility is something even Exige owners are deprived of, & from what I've seen, the Evora should have better visibility than even the Elise. The camera is also nothing new. Rear view cameras were always intended as parking assists, not mirror aids. No cup holder & no glove box is something you won't catch in the Elise or Evora, either; don't seem to be features Lotus encourages.On a side note my father, being the slick guy he is, convinced this bloke at the fancy car section to let him sit in the Lotus Evora. First things first the car is absolutely stunning. IMO the best looking car Lotus has ever made. But that aside, it is pointless. It is not a "luxury" or GT Lotus. It is an Elise with nice leather and nice styling. There is absolutely no utility for that car. You can't see anything out of the back due to the massive engine cover. To make things worse it has a rear camera but it only turns on when you are in reverse!?!?!? The rear haunches block a good portion of what you see in the side vision mirrors, which are way too close to the car. There is no glove compartment. And as stupid as it may sound no cup holder. The rear seats are useless and since they are actual seats putting stuff back there is awkward. And to top it all of they want 80k. HA! For that money I would take a GTR or a used Elise and tune the bonkers out it.
I'm sorry, but that's S4/335i money right there & that comes with the interior & performance options to match. Ford needs to keep their eyes on the dealer markups.
Just type in autotrader, selcet 3 AMG cars, within you area and what not..
Just some quick Ideas.. Note some cars may be cheaper or better then others ones, but some quick general idea on what AMG to get![]()
CLK55
E55
C55 AMG
S AMG!
Like I said, its for your father, he does not deserves a ricer look, he needs a real car![]()
And yet, the AMG name alone can break the handling, maintenance, & durability rule all in one go once you factor in his miles/price limits.
Now, looking at the current market, the CLK55 AMG is reasonably available; $25K average w/ 32-38K miles. C55s are a little higher starting near $25,000 & miles beginning at 40,000 easily. The E55 market is a bit different. Looks like years play a factor as a 2003 can be had for $26K/31K, but a 2004 will shoot up to $30K/38K. So, it's a pretty thorough market. As for the S-Class, treat it like you would a 7 Series, i.e. research the hell out of them because older German V8s & V12s are costly to repair as they age.
I should also mention that the CLK55 is readily available on the private market within your means Pas., but as is nearly the case with any German car, make sure you research the year you're looking at. There are decent models running fine out there, but there's also plenty of ones that are ticking time bombs, & you can be sure private sellers will hide any known faults to the best of their availability.
Requirements:
-Within 250-ish miles of central NY (ie Hudson Valley) I would assume so.
-Must have GREAT (and I mean the caps) seats Debatable. But not bad at all.
-Used or new (if used <50k is preferable) Shouldn't be an issue.
-NO FWD! RWD or AWD (rear bias) ONLY! K, so it's front biased.
-Not fugly Classy
-Not extremely ostentatious Some might say it blends in too much.
-around $20k is the sweet spot) No more than 25 for a great low mileage example
-4 door (or coupe with usable rear seats, no convertible) Check
-Manual Check
Preferences:
-250hp+ (if less, less weight, what he is getting at is sporty) Check
-15+ combined MPG (20+ is preferred) Well, how fast does he drive? 20+ shouldnt be and issue.
-less than 3750lbs (ie not porky) Just barely.
-handling>acceleration (as a rule) It handles well, some understeer occurs, but unless he's going to the track, it is great.
-Not a fortune to maintain Upkeep is pricey, but not a killer at all.
-Reasonably durable He wants to off road it?
-Good visibility Check
-Not required but upgrade-ability is a plus Easy peasy.
Yes, the M5 would seem like a God out of all the cars so nominated so far.An E39 M5 would be god.
May I make a suggestion?
![]()
Yes, the M5 would seem like a God out of all the cars so nominated so far.
But seriously, I agree.![]()
What exactly do you mean by portly?I have heard that car is a bit on portly side (not saying it is not a great car). I will mention it. Also MPGs? Great car none the less.
Anything FWD or AWD is great in snow with snow tires.TrievelA7X, I never said no snow tires I said no chains or spikes.
Also on the Evora, Elise, Exige, etc. The Elise and Exige in fact do have a single cup holder. Its not a big deal but worth noting. Also trust me when I say this, the Evora has horrible rear visibility. Its a fact. Merging on a highway in that car would be a scary proposition.
Honestly as it stands now, in my dads mind the best options are in order: 2.0T Sonata (value), BMW 335xi coupe (loves the car), Evo X (kills multiple birds with one stone). I will let you guys know what he decides on.