Scaff
Moderator
- 29,918
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
Well the first review of the currently Canadian only Wii Mini is out, and unlike the moves taken by MS and Sony, in which the same hardware is included in a smaller, more efficient package, it looks like Nintendo have managed one of those two.
The Wii Mini is a more efficient product (in terms of power use), but that appears to be about all the good news.
The removal of all forms of net connectivity and lack of any form of component out is bizarre, that its not that much smaller at all only adds to the confusion.
So is it a good move or will this (if it hits other markets) just cause confusion among potential Wii customers (Wii/Wii Mini/Wii U)?
The Wii Mini is a more efficient product (in terms of power use), but that appears to be about all the good news.
Source - http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/df-hardware-nintendo-wii-mini-reviewTraditionally, slim and light consoles receive a genuinely warm welcome from gamers across the spectrum: new hardware is typically cheaper, sexier, and sometimes even more refined than their more expensive predecessors, and only very rarely is functionality actually removed. There's usually something for everyone from these major console revisions.
Unfortunately, the sad reality is that the Wii Mini disappoints on almost every level. It's not a good-looking piece of kit at all, functionality has been stripped down to the absolute bare-bones, and perhaps worst of all for a product actively being marketed on its dinky form-factor is the fact that it's not actually that much smaller than the original model. What we have left is a console designed for young children, marketed at a price low enough to qualify it as a toy.
That's fair enough in that respect - there is clearly value here - but what truly rankles is Nintendo's bizarre decision to actively sabotage its own product, effectively alienating it from consideration for more discerning gamers. Removing WiFi is one thing, but killing off support for Nintendo's own Ethernet USB adaptor is quite another. Over and above that, purposefully removing 480p and component video functionality comes across as deliberately spiteful.
We never quite bought into Nintendo's announcement that the Wii Mini would be Canadian exclusive - these console revisions aren't cheap and we assume that the platform holder will roll out the new hardware in other territories in due course. But having spent some time with the Mini, it's safe to say that we'd be quite happy if Nintendo never releases it elsewhere. Original Wii hardware is generally quite reliable and we'd recommend a used example of the older model (look for the newer RVL-101 revision) over this cut-down, fuglier revision.
The removal of all forms of net connectivity and lack of any form of component out is bizarre, that its not that much smaller at all only adds to the confusion.
So is it a good move or will this (if it hits other markets) just cause confusion among potential Wii customers (Wii/Wii Mini/Wii U)?