No banter, betting, speculation or smack, how come?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hypersport
  • 52 comments
  • 2,409 views
i know for testing that 1´00´3 is doable

according to a friend who ran some laps, the ultimate limit would be 59´4, 59´5 but that would be completely insane.

i´m betting we wont have 59´s
 
Well, I posted GTTimes.com's time in the results thread, so you can see we didn't get a 59 ;) (and I know we didn't win this race also ;) )
 
In testing Veilside could get a 59 but he never ran our race. So no 59 from us.
 
Ricolamb
GTweb probably, if a fast guy of them was doing it...maybe P@ss or Stefounzy :P

Yes, it's me. I take the 787B.. 👍

but my DFP is out since 10 days, i made only 3-4 runs and i cannot get a 59s but it wasn't very far... 💡

A+
 
P@ss
Yes, it's me. I take the 787B.. 👍

but my DFP is out since 10 days, i made only 3-4 runs and i cannot get a 59s but it wasn't very far... 💡

A+

Looks like it may have been juuuuuuuuuuuuust enough. :D

If the results stay like this, GTWeb will be in the lead. 👍
 
P@ss
Yes, it's me. I take the 787B.. 👍

but my DFP is out since 10 days, i made only 3-4 runs and i cannot get a 59s but it wasn't very far... 💡

A+

here we go .

"i only make my run in 5 minute" :lol:
 
GT3mich
I only ran 1 lap :lol: ;)


Hey now...

3715_thumb.jpg



:D
 
I think everyone should be able to discuss every time, every setting, every step of the way in the BCs.

Personally I would be one to totally B.S. the whole way through.. post wrong times, goofed settings, etc... all gamesmanship. Just because you could share your efforts, doesn't mean you have to be truthful.. hehehe. And, until the final time is in with a replay nothing matters anyway.
 
Back