CrashBefore we all go on knocking the current owners about their business sense, I want to say that they are probably pretty smart folks. One doesn't simply just get millions of dollars and convince a government to go into a partnership with you.
So does this mean no "Nur" in future Gran Turismo games?
If this was only true.
Sad truth is: it's exactly this easy to drain money from the public. Big media coverage in Germany the past week: former head of state of Baden-Würtemberg, his investment banker buddy and two brothers, one venture capitalist, one another investment banker, signed a 3 billion € deal on buying back the formerly state owned energy company without any backing from the state parliament.
I have an academic economy background and turned civil servant late in my career life. If you want easy money, go do a private-public partnership.
No, this doesn't mean "No Nur in future Gran Turismo games".
ok srry I was to lazy to spell out the full name.
AUPYou will post all messages in English.
You will not use textspeak (r, u, plz, etc.) in your messages. Decent grammar is expected at all times, including proper usage of capital letters.
the aup states:
What do you mean?
Jimlaad43I dont see Monza struggling.
The Nurburgring, like Lotus Cars, is too iconic a name to go down without some interested party buying it. The question is who. And that's an important one. If it's a serious buyer like VW (again... VW has its own rather large testing track already), then they can foster it and make it profitable.
If, like Lotus, it goes to a buyer with lots of money but little direction... then...![]()
If, like TVR, it goes to a buyer who doesn't know what to do with it... then... 👎
I've been visiting today. I have seen for myself the touristenfahrten makes alot of money, busy busy![]()
Norbert Haug says he is sure the place will be saved. Even if Schumacher has to buy it lol.