Offended

  • Thread starter Thread starter quinnidor
  • 31 comments
  • 7,158 views
Messages
74
United States
United States
This livery offended someone, so it was taken down.

Instead of re-sharing, and it likely getting pulled again, I offer to you here the following decals to use and make your own if you wish.
 

Attachments

probably against guidelines or something ... but man, I already have an idea for "quick hamster" livery :lol:

btw. I already saw a livery with certain infamous bear
 
That' the strange thing for me.
I don't get it actually,decals with just the logo's of xxx rated sites aren't allowed but the playboy one by example is allowed.
What's the big difference?
They show both nudity,the one in a more explicit way then the others but hey.
After all the logo doesn't show that content.
Also the manga/anime girls with boobs popping out your eyeballs are also allowed and are everywere.
I think this rule is discriminating.
 
That' the strange thing for me.
I don't get it actually,decals with just the logo's of xxx rated sites aren't allowed but the playboy one by example is allowed.
What's the big difference?
They show both nudity,the one in a more explicit way then the others but hey.
After all the logo doesn't show that content.
Also the manga/anime girls with boobs popping out your eyeballs are also allowed and are everywere.
I think this rule is discriminating.

My guess, is that they reply on people reporting decals and liveries that breach the rules.
If you see something that you would feel inappropriate for a young child - then you should probably report it.
 
And what with the violent content ?
That's allowed to.
It's an issue that always cuts on two sides i guess.
 
And what with the violent content ?
That's allowed to.
It's an issue that always cuts on two sides i guess.

Are you replying to me? or just adding to the thread?

I do not know if Sony/PD actively review content, even if they did, it would be highly unlikely that sufficient resources would be available to monitor everything effectively. Therefore, if the community see something that they feel is inappropriate for a young child, then it should be reported.
 
Are you replying to me? or just adding to the thread?

I do not know if Sony/PD actively review content, even if they did, it would be highly unlikely that sufficient resources would be available to monitor everything effectively. Therefore, if the community see something that they feel is inappropriate for a young child, then it should be reported.

General comment ;)
 
Alcohol and tabac sponsored cars would make the half of GT liveries but pornhub? Hell no!!!
 
Why do so many people upload the pornhub logos? You know it's gonna be taken down.

I just like to make realistic looking racecars. It's so gross how people throw silly logos/memes on their cars

Not trying to be the livery police or ruin anyone’s fun, and I have never reported nor will I ever; but there are so many gaudy, distracting, inappropriate, childish liveries out there it’s terrible. It’s just another factor summing up my reasoning to completely avoid online play in this game. A total turn-off personally.
 
Not trying to be the livery police or ruin anyone’s fun, and I have never reported nor will I ever; but there are so many gaudy, distracting, inappropriate, childish liveries out there it’s terrible. It’s just another factor summing up my reasoning to completely avoid online play in this game. A total turn-off personally.


Every time I enter the paint booth, I try to make a realistic looking racecar. Is it perfect? No, but I'd like to think it looks a helluva litter better that naked women silhouettes and memes...

PS_Messages_20180226_152432.jpg
 
Every time I enter the paint booth, I try to make a realistic looking racecar. Is it perfect? No, but I'd like to think it looks a helluva litter better that naked women silhouettes and memes...

View attachment 717479

I like the tacky liveries and stuff. its an honest kind of fun. online games arent real life .. not everyone wants to roleplay
 
Promoting freely available hardcore pornography to minors isn't a good idea. It's not something I'd personally report, but I also wouldn't care if I'd had such material removed.

Playboy might be a different case as it's real-world motorsport sponsorship is somewhat more prolific than porn hub's.
 
True, but there are effective measures in place to limit access to the things that alcohol and tobacco sponsorship advocate.

Put it this way, AUP aside, which do you think would be a worse thing for me to post here...

a) Hey, Everyone, Jagermeister is GREAT! You should all really try it.

or

b) A screen cap of what you see if you follow a link to Pornhub.

Exposure to Porn on the internet, and exposure to the glorious effects of alcohol, do not occur in the same way, so I personally don't think they're comparable.

And again, I believe there's an argument to say that Alcohol and Tobacco sponsorship should be allowed because it is both common, and historically accurate in many many cases throughout several decades of motorsport.

Like I say, it's not something that I find personally offensive, but if PD choose to take it down, I don't have 1µ of a problem with it.
 
Even as a youngster I would be curious about Marlboros or Camels and knowing cigarette access is limited probably wouldn't care too much, but since most have internet access it so easy to Google Porn hub! How old were you when you understood what the word porn meant. I'm sure now it's younger than you were and at that age you'd probably check it out! (if you haven't found it already!) Even more hilarious it the Jergen's sponsor on there too!
 
Liveries like that displays a rather adolescent fascination. I'd have thought with access to pornography as adults, cheap thrills like subverting censorship rules was low hanging fruit.
 
I can understand (although disagree with) being offended by the the CONTENT of the website, and of course posting images of naked people on the side of the car is inappropriate... but being offended by just the NAME? That seems ridiculous to me. There is nothing explicit about it.
 
This livery offended someone, so it was taken down.

Instead of re-sharing, and it likely getting pulled again, I offer to you here the following decals to use and make your own if you wish.
I have TAMPAX as my main sponsor on my ft1 and durex and Siemens also included on the same livery.... It gets noticed but in a funny way..... Mostly people comment with funny remarks with an lol included.
I don't see how any livery can be classed as offensive unless it contains banned words which we aren't allowed to type
 
Last edited:
I have TAMPAX as my main sponsor on my ft1 and durex and Siemens also included on the same livery.... It gets noticed but in a funny way..... Mostly people comment with funny remarks with an lol included.
It's don't see how any livery can be classed as offensive unless it contains banned words which we aren't allowed to type

Tampax isn't sexual. Siemens isn't sexual. Durex pertains to the act of sex, but is more sensible than sexual (because there are too many unwanted mistakes in the world already). Pornhub relates to someones son, daughter, sister, brother, mother, father, having intimate, hardcore, graphic, sometimes inappropriate, or painful, sexual relations with someone else's son, daughter, sister, brother, mother, father, cat, dog, cow, grandparent, cartoon character or inanimate object.... it really is not the same thing.
 
Seeing as it's actually just the logo being used and not the product itself, it kinda is the same thing in my view. Unfortunately I don't use TAMPAX as there isn't a male version yet as far as I know but I don't find it offensive just because "it's not for me".
The world is a crazy place and there's millions of things which offend billions people every second of the day but we can't grumble at every single thing that's written, spoken, sung about, failed, accomplished, destroyed, created etc etc.
Lighten up and take every day as it comes. Life's to short to get angry
 
Seeing as it's actually just the logo being used and not the product itself, it kinda is the same thing in my view.

Why would Tampax - the product itself - offend people anyway? I'm not entirely sure why you're mixing up female sanitary products (or contraceptives) with Pornhub, though I think I can guess.
 
Why would Tampax - the product itself - offend people anyway? I'm not entirely sure why you're mixing up female sanitary products (or contraceptives) with Pornhub, though I think I can guess.
Exactly this. I think I can guess why as well
 
Pretty sure porn sites have sponsored race cars in real life already. If they really don't want porn sites advertising on GT, then just add a line in the sticker upload rules : "all porn related decals are prohibited". As simple as that.

Also, I don't get all the fuss about itashas. I mean, it's not like appealing girls aren't portrayed in pretty much half the cartoons kids have access to. Sure, I've seen some anime decals with very suggestive poses, but these one got taken out pretty quickly. For the rest, the itasha culture is quite huge in Japan, so it's not out of place in GT.
 
Last edited:
Pretty sure porn sites have sponsored race cars in real life already. If they really don't want porn sites advertising on GT, then just add a line in the sticker upload rules : "all porn related decals are prohibited". As simple as that.

Also, I don't get all the fuss about itashas. I mean, it's not like appealing girls aren't portrayed in pretty much half the cartoons kids have access to. Sure, I've seen some anime decals whith very suggestive poses, but these one got taken out pretty quickly. For the rest, the itasha culture is quite huge in Japan, so it's not out of place in GT.

Common sense should prevail over people looking for precedent. Precedent shouldn't negate being ****'s.
 
Back