Oh, oh, oh, I'm making a Ludicrous Claim®! Read the first post!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Der Alta
  • 5,760 comments
  • 574,054 views
Careful, starting problems with my friend Katiegan will lead to problems.

Calling her an under achiever? Really? You're not going to last long. :grumpy:

What you going to do? Don't get me started, she disrespected my daughter.
 
Just because you're a under achiever insulting them does not make you better.

Most ninja of edits! :bowdown:

But still an when followed by a vowel. ;)
 
she disrespected my daughter.

So you disrespect her in return?:confused:

If you truly have a problem with something someone says, report it, don't take it into your own hands, that just leads to both parties getting in trouble. Trust me, I know from experience.
 
What you going to do lol? Don't get me started, she disrespected my daughter.

:ouch: Tit for tat? Eye for eye? Doesn't make it right. Nor did she specifically say that about your daughter, or even know that your daughter attends that school.


But, to retaliate as such... I'm going to show my loyalty and friendship with Katie. She's a friend, and I don't want her to have to deal with someone who clearly hasn't read the AUP's rules about not harassing or insulting other members.

So, with respect, drop it. You're still in the wrong, it doesn't matter.

But, as Famine implied, are you sure you're old enough to own a car? To have a daughter? The tit for tat mentality speaks of low maturity.
 
:ouch: Tit for tat? Eye for eye? Doesn't make it right. Nor did she specifically say that about your daughter, or even know that your daughter attends that school.


But, to retaliate as such... I'm going to show my loyalty and friendship with Katie. She's a friend, and I don't want her to have to deal with someone who clearly hasn't read the AUP's rules about not harassing or insulting other members.

So, with respect, drop it. You're still in the wrong, it doesn't matter.

But, as Famine implied, are you sure you're old enough to own a car? To have a daughter? The tit for tat mentality speaks of low maturity.


I think 36 is a acceptable age.
 
Watch your mouth. My daughter goes there. Just because you're a under achiever insulting them does not make you better.

jon-popcorn.gif


Well, that was just............. Ludicrous. Nobody talked about your daughter. Just the area. Jump to conclusions much?
 
I think 36 is a acceptable age.

An acceptable one to choose, sure. It's a shame it took a member of staff pointing out the truth for you to change it. Keep up the poor, insulting attitude, and you may just end up banned before we address the whole lying thing.

Now, where's that proof, D?
 
Ok. sorry, but I was just casually cruising threads. Did someone just insult Katie? Back off now. I'm willing to be banned from GTP for Katie.
 
Watch your mouth. My daughter goes there. Just because you're a under achiever insulting them does not make you better.

Oh boy. Seems like there's a lot bigger of an issue here completely detached from the issue at hand.


For%2520Trolling%2520Purposes%2520Only.gif
 
Last edited:
:ouch: Tit for tat? Eye for eye? Doesn't make it right. Nor did she specifically say that about your daughter, or even know that your daughter attends that school.


But, to retaliate as such... I'm going to show my loyalty and friendship with Katie. She's a friend, and I don't want her to have to deal with someone who clearly hasn't read the AUP's rules about not harassing or insulting other members.

So, with respect, drop it. You're still in the wrong, it doesn't matter.

But, as Famine implied, are you sure you're old enough to own a car? To have a daughter? The tit for tat mentality speaks of low maturity.

Oh the irony...
 
Oh boy. Seems like there's a lot bigger of an issue here completely detached from the issue at hand.

When you put it like that, :lol: I can only laugh. It seems that the liar (I mean) accused is experiencing technical difficulties with his camera. Please hold.
 
Ok. sorry, but I was just casually cruising threads. Did someone just insult Katie? Back off now. I'm willing to be banned from GTP for Katie.

:lol:
 
*insert popcorn eating gif that has not been used here*. Woah, things got out of hand quickly.
 
This thread is awesome. This is the first time I have been here, I think, and it's keeping me up. It's now 4.12AM and I'm wide awake, keep going guys.
 
An acceptable one to choose, sure. It's a shame it took a member of staff pointing out the truth for you to change it. Keep up the poor, insulting attitude, and you may just end up banned before we address the whole lying thing.

Now, where's that proof, D?

I signed up on Iphone and must have put a nine instead of 7. What now want a passport picture?
 
Question?

How does this thread work? Do people ACTUALLY make ludicrous claims here? Or do they get directed here?
 
nealcropper
Question?

How does this thread work? Do people ACTUALLY make ludicrous claims here? Or do they get directed here?

Bit of both really, but normally the claim takes place in another thread. Then the argument finds its way here.
 
They get directed here when someone, usually (but not always) a staff member, comes across a post and asks for proof.
 
Question?

How does this thread work? Do people ACTUALLY make ludicrous claims here? Or do they get directed here?
Read back through the thread. You call out ludicrous posts here.
 
Bit of both really, but normally the claim takes place in another thread. Then the argument finds its way here.

Right. I didn't think that someone would be dumb enough to actually make a ludicrous claim in the ludicrous claim thread. I mean, how ON TOPIC can a forum actually be??? Lol.

Edit: sorry, I just read back through that and realised it may have come across a bit harsh. I understand the thread and am entertained none-the-less.
 
Right. I didn't think that someone would be dumb enough to actually make a ludicrous claim in the ludicrous claim thread. I mean, how ON TOPIC can a forum actually be??? Lol.

Have your read the last couple of pages? :lol:
 
I was typing while you were editing. You had me beat on speed. :cheers:
 
I've just opened up a few new tabs with some memes at the read. :D
 
Seems like he's trying to steer the subject away from those cars he supposedly owns and decided to be overly defensive in one go with that post directed at Katie. Good start if you ask me.

It's a shame I can't stay up to see this come to a possible conclusion though. *Sigh*
 
Back