- 12,917
- Cambridge
- Moglet85
- Moglet
I'm in a bit of a pickle lately, having driven the Abarth 500 I've decided I want something with a bit more oomph but I still want a car with a quirky nature. My 500 is still a brilliant car but the engine really isn't cutting it lately. So I've been looking at the Panda 100HP. It's not the quickest car in the world but it's cheap to buy, cheap to run and cheap to insure, just like the 500.
But you've got the extra power. Now obviously since buying my 500 brand new I have to take into account my losses. The Abarth dealer offered me £7,000 for my 500 in part exchange, and a new Panda 100HP costs £7,295 (On offer, RRP is £10,500) so I'd be making HUGE savings on the brand new Panda, but my 500 will have lost £2,500 in depreciation anyway.
Here's how they stack up;
Fiat 500 1.2 Lounge
Pros: Looks good, turns more heads, safer in a crash, more equipment (just)
Cons: Looks a bit girly, has less power, all models have ongoing fault that Fiat can't find a fix for
0-60: 13 seconds
Average MPG: 44
Insurance Group: 2
Road tax: £35 per year
Panda 100HP
Pros: Still looks good IMO, is obviously faster, has climate control instead of a glass roof, no ongoing faults
Cons: Not as safe as the 500, not as much of a head turner, older model, more expensive to tax
0-60: 9.5 seconds
Average MPG: 40
Insurance group: 5
Road tax: £145 per year
What does GTP reckon? I'm mighty tempted to go for the nippy Panda as I've always liked them. But the 500 keeps drawing me back with it's styling and interior. Both come with 3 years warranty and 1 year AA roadside assistance.
Nnnnggg!
But you've got the extra power. Now obviously since buying my 500 brand new I have to take into account my losses. The Abarth dealer offered me £7,000 for my 500 in part exchange, and a new Panda 100HP costs £7,295 (On offer, RRP is £10,500) so I'd be making HUGE savings on the brand new Panda, but my 500 will have lost £2,500 in depreciation anyway.
Here's how they stack up;
Fiat 500 1.2 Lounge
Pros: Looks good, turns more heads, safer in a crash, more equipment (just)
Cons: Looks a bit girly, has less power, all models have ongoing fault that Fiat can't find a fix for
0-60: 13 seconds
Average MPG: 44
Insurance Group: 2
Road tax: £35 per year
Panda 100HP
Pros: Still looks good IMO, is obviously faster, has climate control instead of a glass roof, no ongoing faults
Cons: Not as safe as the 500, not as much of a head turner, older model, more expensive to tax
0-60: 9.5 seconds
Average MPG: 40
Insurance group: 5
Road tax: £145 per year
What does GTP reckon? I'm mighty tempted to go for the nippy Panda as I've always liked them. But the 500 keeps drawing me back with it's styling and interior. Both come with 3 years warranty and 1 year AA roadside assistance.
Nnnnggg!
Last edited: