- 90
Just wondering what does everyone like better. Personally I hate mac, at least any mac with an operating system below OSX.
Originally posted by emad
how 'bout Gentoo Linux on Mac?![]()
Originally posted by Shadow
pc...mac is a pain in the ass
Originally posted by skylineGTR_guy
http://www.thehoucks.com/happynowhere/Apple_Switch_Parody_DivX.avi
**F-word warning**
3.2 Mb Divx file
Originally posted by emad
but...the mac architecture is soooo much better!!!
Ah, the joyful sound of closed-minded, ignorant, knee-jerk bigotry...Originally posted by toyomatt84
An iBook? Those are the worst excuse for a laptop, oh wait, I can't even give them the respect of being called a laptop. They are just overpriced paperweights!
Originally posted by DoomsDayDevice4
And another thing, HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO USE THIS CRAPPY ROUND ONE BUTTON MOUSE!!!![]()
Originally posted by neon_duke
Ah, the joyful sound of clodes-minded, ignorant, knee-jerk bigotry...
Originally posted by Super-Supra
Having used both, for graphics a Mac is the way to go. But for user practicality, and other stuff, PC's are the way to go.
But an independent test lab's findings confirm that while Motorola's PowerPC G3 chips are indeed faster than their Intel counterparts in CPU-intensive applications and synthetic benchmarks, real-world tests show Intel-based PCs provide better overall performance.
The application tests -- using Excel, Word, FileMaker Pro, and Photoshop -- emulate sequences of common activities, demonstrating how the system would respond during typical use. One sequence, for example, consists of opening a file, inserting text, performing a spell-check, and writing and closing the file. Other sequences include chart preparation, database querying and displaying, and sets of image operations.
The bars show time to complete the operation in seconds for each test. Smaller times indicate better performance.
![]()
![]()